The Alternative to Occupy? Radical Politics between Protest and Parliament

Emil Husted, Allan Dreyer Hansen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

94 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we compare the political anatomy of two distinct enactments of (leftist) radical politics: Occupy Wall Street, a large social movement in the United States, and The Alternative, a recently elected political party in Denmark. Based on Ernesto Laclau’s conceptualization of ‘the universal’ and ‘the particular’, we show how the institutionalization of radical politics (as carried out by The Alternative) entails a move from universality towards particularity. This move, however, comes with the risk of cutting off supporters who no longer feel represented by the project. We refer to this problem as the problem of particularization. In conclusion, we use the analysis to propose a conceptual distinction between radical movements and radical parties: While the former is constituted by a potentially infinite chain of equivalent grievances, the latter is constituted by a prioritized set of differential demands. While both are important, we argue that they must remain distinct in order to preserve the universal spirit of contemporary radical politics.
Original languageEnglish
JournaltripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
Volume15
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)459-477
Number of pages19
ISSN1726-670X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Radical Politics
  • Radical Movements
  • Radical Parties
  • Discourse Theory
  • Ernesto Laclau
  • Universalism
  • Particularism
  • Occupy Wall Street
  • The Alternative

Cite this