Taxation of Cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish Perspectives

Louise Fjord Kjærsgaard, Autilia Arfwidsson

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The authors analyse the current classification of cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish domestic income tax perspectives. Cryptocurrencies are analysed as they are typically applied in practice, where a categorization is made between coins, utility tokens, security tokens and asset tokens. In particular, it is concluded that despite the economic differences of different cryptocurrencies, they generally fall outside the scope of Danish and Swedish lex specialis regulation on taxation of capital gains and losses from the sale of certain assets, for example, shares and claims in currency. In both countries, there appears to be a presumption that most cryptocurrencies should be taxed as assets held for investment and speculative purposes. It is argued that such an approach is problematic not only in relation to the principle of neutrality, but also because it creates a barrier to realizing the economic potential of cryptocurrencies. The authors conclude that (1) the classification of cryptocurrencies poses challenges and uncertainty for tax purposes due to the lack of a regulatory framework, the absence of common definitions and the diverse technical structure of tokens and coins and (2) the classification for Danish and Swedish tax law purposes should be based on a case-by-case assessment of the specific cryptocurrency.
Original languageEnglish
JournalIntertax
Volume47
Issue number6/7
Pages (from-to)620-634
Number of pages15
ISSN0165-2826
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

Kjærsgaard, Louise Fjord ; Arfwidsson, Autilia. / Taxation of Cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish Perspectives. In: Intertax. 2019 ; Vol. 47, No. 6/7. pp. 620-634.
@article{1d4021a07e094b6a85e4e31b818c2a40,
title = "Taxation of Cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish Perspectives",
abstract = "The authors analyse the current classification of cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish domestic income tax perspectives. Cryptocurrencies are analysed as they are typically applied in practice, where a categorization is made between coins, utility tokens, security tokens and asset tokens. In particular, it is concluded that despite the economic differences of different cryptocurrencies, they generally fall outside the scope of Danish and Swedish lex specialis regulation on taxation of capital gains and losses from the sale of certain assets, for example, shares and claims in currency. In both countries, there appears to be a presumption that most cryptocurrencies should be taxed as assets held for investment and speculative purposes. It is argued that such an approach is problematic not only in relation to the principle of neutrality, but also because it creates a barrier to realizing the economic potential of cryptocurrencies. The authors conclude that (1) the classification of cryptocurrencies poses challenges and uncertainty for tax purposes due to the lack of a regulatory framework, the absence of common definitions and the diverse technical structure of tokens and coins and (2) the classification for Danish and Swedish tax law purposes should be based on a case-by-case assessment of the specific cryptocurrency.",
author = "Kj{\ae}rsgaard, {Louise Fjord} and Autilia Arfwidsson",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "620--634",
journal = "Intertax",
issn = "0165-2826",
publisher = "Kluwer Law International",
number = "6/7",

}

Taxation of Cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish Perspectives. / Kjærsgaard, Louise Fjord ; Arfwidsson, Autilia.

In: Intertax, Vol. 47, No. 6/7, 2019, p. 620-634.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taxation of Cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish Perspectives

AU - Kjærsgaard, Louise Fjord

AU - Arfwidsson, Autilia

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The authors analyse the current classification of cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish domestic income tax perspectives. Cryptocurrencies are analysed as they are typically applied in practice, where a categorization is made between coins, utility tokens, security tokens and asset tokens. In particular, it is concluded that despite the economic differences of different cryptocurrencies, they generally fall outside the scope of Danish and Swedish lex specialis regulation on taxation of capital gains and losses from the sale of certain assets, for example, shares and claims in currency. In both countries, there appears to be a presumption that most cryptocurrencies should be taxed as assets held for investment and speculative purposes. It is argued that such an approach is problematic not only in relation to the principle of neutrality, but also because it creates a barrier to realizing the economic potential of cryptocurrencies. The authors conclude that (1) the classification of cryptocurrencies poses challenges and uncertainty for tax purposes due to the lack of a regulatory framework, the absence of common definitions and the diverse technical structure of tokens and coins and (2) the classification for Danish and Swedish tax law purposes should be based on a case-by-case assessment of the specific cryptocurrency.

AB - The authors analyse the current classification of cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish domestic income tax perspectives. Cryptocurrencies are analysed as they are typically applied in practice, where a categorization is made between coins, utility tokens, security tokens and asset tokens. In particular, it is concluded that despite the economic differences of different cryptocurrencies, they generally fall outside the scope of Danish and Swedish lex specialis regulation on taxation of capital gains and losses from the sale of certain assets, for example, shares and claims in currency. In both countries, there appears to be a presumption that most cryptocurrencies should be taxed as assets held for investment and speculative purposes. It is argued that such an approach is problematic not only in relation to the principle of neutrality, but also because it creates a barrier to realizing the economic potential of cryptocurrencies. The authors conclude that (1) the classification of cryptocurrencies poses challenges and uncertainty for tax purposes due to the lack of a regulatory framework, the absence of common definitions and the diverse technical structure of tokens and coins and (2) the classification for Danish and Swedish tax law purposes should be based on a case-by-case assessment of the specific cryptocurrency.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017418032&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

M3 - Journal article

VL - 47

SP - 620

EP - 634

JO - Intertax

JF - Intertax

SN - 0165-2826

IS - 6/7

ER -