Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Intertax |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 6/7 |
| Pages (from-to) | 620-634 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISSN | 0165-2826 |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Cite this
}
Taxation of Cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish Perspectives. / Kjærsgaard, Louise Fjord ; Arfwidsson, Autilia.
In: Intertax, Vol. 47, No. 6/7, 2019, p. 620-634.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Taxation of Cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish Perspectives
AU - Kjærsgaard, Louise Fjord
AU - Arfwidsson, Autilia
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The authors analyse the current classification of cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish domestic income tax perspectives. Cryptocurrencies are analysed as they are typically applied in practice, where a categorization is made between coins, utility tokens, security tokens and asset tokens. In particular, it is concluded that despite the economic differences of different cryptocurrencies, they generally fall outside the scope of Danish and Swedish lex specialis regulation on taxation of capital gains and losses from the sale of certain assets, for example, shares and claims in currency. In both countries, there appears to be a presumption that most cryptocurrencies should be taxed as assets held for investment and speculative purposes. It is argued that such an approach is problematic not only in relation to the principle of neutrality, but also because it creates a barrier to realizing the economic potential of cryptocurrencies. The authors conclude that (1) the classification of cryptocurrencies poses challenges and uncertainty for tax purposes due to the lack of a regulatory framework, the absence of common definitions and the diverse technical structure of tokens and coins and (2) the classification for Danish and Swedish tax law purposes should be based on a case-by-case assessment of the specific cryptocurrency.
AB - The authors analyse the current classification of cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish domestic income tax perspectives. Cryptocurrencies are analysed as they are typically applied in practice, where a categorization is made between coins, utility tokens, security tokens and asset tokens. In particular, it is concluded that despite the economic differences of different cryptocurrencies, they generally fall outside the scope of Danish and Swedish lex specialis regulation on taxation of capital gains and losses from the sale of certain assets, for example, shares and claims in currency. In both countries, there appears to be a presumption that most cryptocurrencies should be taxed as assets held for investment and speculative purposes. It is argued that such an approach is problematic not only in relation to the principle of neutrality, but also because it creates a barrier to realizing the economic potential of cryptocurrencies. The authors conclude that (1) the classification of cryptocurrencies poses challenges and uncertainty for tax purposes due to the lack of a regulatory framework, the absence of common definitions and the diverse technical structure of tokens and coins and (2) the classification for Danish and Swedish tax law purposes should be based on a case-by-case assessment of the specific cryptocurrency.
UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017418032&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes
M3 - Journal article
VL - 47
SP - 620
EP - 634
JO - Intertax
JF - Intertax
SN - 0165-2826
IS - 6/7
ER -