Talking Up a Storm

How Backers Use Public Discourse to Exert Control in Crowdfunded Systems Development Projects

Rob Gleasure, Kieran Conboy, Lorraine Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Crowdfunding has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional funding, wherein project owners use web technologies to fundraise from members of the public (“backers”). The established models of control do not work for this new way of performing systems development, because of the number and diversity of controllers, the restriction of interaction to public online discourse, and the absence of defined hierarchical power structures. This study performs a critical discourse analysis of public online discourse from two famous crowdfunded systems development projects. It develops a framework for the study of crowdfunding control that incorporates the prominent role that power, informal control, and discourse play. The study shows that backers are empowered by their ability to construct a positive or negative public image around a project, and they use this power to impose a diverse portfolio of formal and informal controls. Findings reveal a fundamental vulnerability in crowdfunding, as public perceptions of failure push backers to become increasingly assertive and owners to become decreasingly compliant.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInformation Systems Research
Volume30
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)447-465
Number of pages19
ISSN1047-7047
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Bibliographical note

Published online: 16. May 2019

Keywords

  • Systems development
  • Crowd
  • Crowdfunding
  • Control
  • Critical theory
  • Foucault

Cite this

@article{eff98820428748d98315f38b53d26e1e,
title = "Talking Up a Storm: How Backers Use Public Discourse to Exert Control in Crowdfunded Systems Development Projects",
abstract = "Crowdfunding has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional funding, wherein project owners use web technologies to fundraise from members of the public (“backers”). The established models of control do not work for this new way of performing systems development, because of the number and diversity of controllers, the restriction of interaction to public online discourse, and the absence of defined hierarchical power structures. This study performs a critical discourse analysis of public online discourse from two famous crowdfunded systems development projects. It develops a framework for the study of crowdfunding control that incorporates the prominent role that power, informal control, and discourse play. The study shows that backers are empowered by their ability to construct a positive or negative public image around a project, and they use this power to impose a diverse portfolio of formal and informal controls. Findings reveal a fundamental vulnerability in crowdfunding, as public perceptions of failure push backers to become increasingly assertive and owners to become decreasingly compliant.",
keywords = "Systems development, Crowd, Crowdfunding, Control, Critical theory, Foucault, Systems development, Crowd, Crowdfunding, Control, Critical theory, Foucault",
author = "Rob Gleasure and Kieran Conboy and Lorraine Morgan",
note = "Published online: 16. May 2019",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1287/isre.2019.0840",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "447--465",
journal = "Information Systems Research",
issn = "1047-7047",
publisher = "Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences",
number = "2",

}

Talking Up a Storm : How Backers Use Public Discourse to Exert Control in Crowdfunded Systems Development Projects. / Gleasure, Rob; Conboy, Kieran; Morgan, Lorraine.

In: Information Systems Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, 06.2019, p. 447-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Talking Up a Storm

T2 - How Backers Use Public Discourse to Exert Control in Crowdfunded Systems Development Projects

AU - Gleasure, Rob

AU - Conboy, Kieran

AU - Morgan, Lorraine

N1 - Published online: 16. May 2019

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Crowdfunding has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional funding, wherein project owners use web technologies to fundraise from members of the public (“backers”). The established models of control do not work for this new way of performing systems development, because of the number and diversity of controllers, the restriction of interaction to public online discourse, and the absence of defined hierarchical power structures. This study performs a critical discourse analysis of public online discourse from two famous crowdfunded systems development projects. It develops a framework for the study of crowdfunding control that incorporates the prominent role that power, informal control, and discourse play. The study shows that backers are empowered by their ability to construct a positive or negative public image around a project, and they use this power to impose a diverse portfolio of formal and informal controls. Findings reveal a fundamental vulnerability in crowdfunding, as public perceptions of failure push backers to become increasingly assertive and owners to become decreasingly compliant.

AB - Crowdfunding has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional funding, wherein project owners use web technologies to fundraise from members of the public (“backers”). The established models of control do not work for this new way of performing systems development, because of the number and diversity of controllers, the restriction of interaction to public online discourse, and the absence of defined hierarchical power structures. This study performs a critical discourse analysis of public online discourse from two famous crowdfunded systems development projects. It develops a framework for the study of crowdfunding control that incorporates the prominent role that power, informal control, and discourse play. The study shows that backers are empowered by their ability to construct a positive or negative public image around a project, and they use this power to impose a diverse portfolio of formal and informal controls. Findings reveal a fundamental vulnerability in crowdfunding, as public perceptions of failure push backers to become increasingly assertive and owners to become decreasingly compliant.

KW - Systems development

KW - Crowd

KW - Crowdfunding

KW - Control

KW - Critical theory

KW - Foucault

KW - Systems development

KW - Crowd

KW - Crowdfunding

KW - Control

KW - Critical theory

KW - Foucault

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921418484&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1287/isre.2019.0840

DO - 10.1287/isre.2019.0840

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 447

EP - 465

JO - Information Systems Research

JF - Information Systems Research

SN - 1047-7047

IS - 2

ER -