Tackling Chinese Upgrading through Experimentalism and Pragmatism: The Case of China’s Wind Turbine Industry

Julia Kirch Kirkegaard

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper examines the development of China’s wind turbine industry, shedding light on the Chinese mode of disruptive industrial upgrading through policy pragmatism and fragmented, experimental governance. Based on a historical analysis of China’s wind turbine industry, the paper highlights three distinct phases, which are all marked by their own inbuilt and potentially self-disruptive impasses and associated crises. In turn, these impasses have forced the Chinese government into radical and flexible interventions, which have spurred on Chinese companies to creatively find new ways to develop and upgrade. The paper illustrates the transformation of Sino–foreign relations by China’s non-linear upgrading approach, particularly during the Chinese wind power industry’s quality crisis, and its development model. It also discusses the implications this examination of China’s approach has for the literatures on China, upgrading, and catch-up. Finally, the paper calls on future studies to enquire further into China’s distinct mode of industrial upgrading and its embeddedness in China’s institutional context.
    This paper examines the development of China’s wind turbine industry, shedding light on the Chinese mode of disruptive industrial upgrading through policy pragmatism and fragmented, experimental governance. Based on a historical analysis of China’s wind turbine industry, the paper highlights three distinct phases, which are all marked by their own inbuilt and potentially self-disruptive impasses and associated crises. In turn, these impasses have forced the Chinese government into radical and flexible interventions, which have spurred on Chinese companies to creatively find new ways to develop and upgrade. The paper illustrates the transformation of Sino–foreign relations by China’s non-linear upgrading approach, particularly during the Chinese wind power industry’s quality crisis, and its development model. It also discusses the implications this examination of China’s approach has for the literatures on China, upgrading, and catch-up. Finally, the paper calls on future studies to enquire further into China’s distinct mode of industrial upgrading and its embeddedness in China’s institutional context.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Current Chinese Affairs
    Volume46
    Issue number2
    Pages7-39
    ISSN0341-6631
    StatePublished - 2017

    Keywords

    • China
    • Industrial upgrading
    • Self-disruption
    • Wind power
    • Policy experimentation
    • Pragmatic governance
    • Fragmented authoritarianism

    Cite this

    @article{8f673e188f3545458daad13f0251fbdf,
    title = "Tackling Chinese Upgrading through Experimentalism and Pragmatism: The Case of China’s Wind Turbine Industry",
    abstract = "This paper examines the development of China’s wind turbine industry, shedding light on the Chinese mode of disruptive industrial upgrading through policy pragmatism and fragmented, experimental governance. Based on a historical analysis of China’s wind turbine industry, the paper highlights three distinct phases, which are all marked by their own inbuilt and potentially self-disruptive impasses and associated crises. In turn, these impasses have forced the Chinese government into radical and flexible interventions, which have spurred on Chinese companies to creatively find new ways to develop and upgrade. The paper illustrates the transformation of Sino–foreign relations by China’s non-linear upgrading approach, particularly during the Chinese wind power industry’s quality crisis, and its development model. It also discusses the implications this examination of China’s approach has for the literatures on China, upgrading, and catch-up. Finally, the paper calls on future studies to enquire further into China’s distinct mode of industrial upgrading and its embeddedness in China’s institutional context.",
    keywords = "China, Industrial upgrading, Self-disruption, Wind power, Policy experimentation, Pragmatic governance, Fragmented authoritarianism, China, Industrial upgrading, Self-disruption, Wind power, Policy experimentation, Pragmatic governance, Fragmented authoritarianism",
    author = "Kirkegaard, {Julia Kirch}",
    year = "2017",
    language = "English",
    volume = "46",
    pages = "7--39",
    journal = "Journal of Current Chinese Affairs",
    issn = "1868-1026",
    publisher = "GIGA Institute of Asian Studies",
    number = "2",

    }

    Tackling Chinese Upgrading through Experimentalism and Pragmatism : The Case of China’s Wind Turbine Industry. / Kirkegaard, Julia Kirch.

    In: Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2017, p. 7-39.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Tackling Chinese Upgrading through Experimentalism and Pragmatism

    T2 - Journal of Current Chinese Affairs

    AU - Kirkegaard,Julia Kirch

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - This paper examines the development of China’s wind turbine industry, shedding light on the Chinese mode of disruptive industrial upgrading through policy pragmatism and fragmented, experimental governance. Based on a historical analysis of China’s wind turbine industry, the paper highlights three distinct phases, which are all marked by their own inbuilt and potentially self-disruptive impasses and associated crises. In turn, these impasses have forced the Chinese government into radical and flexible interventions, which have spurred on Chinese companies to creatively find new ways to develop and upgrade. The paper illustrates the transformation of Sino–foreign relations by China’s non-linear upgrading approach, particularly during the Chinese wind power industry’s quality crisis, and its development model. It also discusses the implications this examination of China’s approach has for the literatures on China, upgrading, and catch-up. Finally, the paper calls on future studies to enquire further into China’s distinct mode of industrial upgrading and its embeddedness in China’s institutional context.

    AB - This paper examines the development of China’s wind turbine industry, shedding light on the Chinese mode of disruptive industrial upgrading through policy pragmatism and fragmented, experimental governance. Based on a historical analysis of China’s wind turbine industry, the paper highlights three distinct phases, which are all marked by their own inbuilt and potentially self-disruptive impasses and associated crises. In turn, these impasses have forced the Chinese government into radical and flexible interventions, which have spurred on Chinese companies to creatively find new ways to develop and upgrade. The paper illustrates the transformation of Sino–foreign relations by China’s non-linear upgrading approach, particularly during the Chinese wind power industry’s quality crisis, and its development model. It also discusses the implications this examination of China’s approach has for the literatures on China, upgrading, and catch-up. Finally, the paper calls on future studies to enquire further into China’s distinct mode of industrial upgrading and its embeddedness in China’s institutional context.

    KW - China

    KW - Industrial upgrading

    KW - Self-disruption

    KW - Wind power

    KW - Policy experimentation

    KW - Pragmatic governance

    KW - Fragmented authoritarianism

    KW - China

    KW - Industrial upgrading

    KW - Self-disruption

    KW - Wind power

    KW - Policy experimentation

    KW - Pragmatic governance

    KW - Fragmented authoritarianism

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 46

    SP - 7

    EP - 39

    JO - Journal of Current Chinese Affairs

    JF - Journal of Current Chinese Affairs

    SN - 1868-1026

    IS - 2

    ER -