Sympathy or Strategy: Social Capital Drivers for Collaborative Contributions to the IS Community

Matthias Trier, Judith Molka-Danielsen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Despite growing interest in delineating the social identity of Information Systems (IS) research and the network structures of its scholarly community, little is known about how the IS community network is shaped by individual conceptions and what motivates IS researchers to engage in research collaboration. Using an exploratory theoretical framework that is based on three dimensions of social capital theory, we examined 32 years of scientific co-authorship in an international IS researcher community. We formulated propositions to empirically examine the multi-level relationships between personal drivers and the resulting complex network organization of the IS community. Our propositions are refined with qualitative interviews and tested using a survey. This process revealed a collaborative research culture with several individual dispositions, including a strategic structural focus, a cognitive focus and a relational focus. These exist among actors displaying a range of differing behaviours such as active engagement and passive serendipity. Our study indicates individual differences at the conception stage of engaging in academic collaboration impact on the resulting network-level configuration. We identified that regional preference, maturity life cycles and lack of small-world properties highlight the important role of senior members as structural backbones and brokers within the IS community.

    Despite growing interest in delineating the social identity of Information Systems (IS) research and the network structures of its scholarly community, little is known about how the IS community network is shaped by individual conceptions and what motivates IS researchers to engage in research collaboration. Using an exploratory theoretical framework that is based on three dimensions of social capital theory, we examined 32 years of scientific co-authorship in an international IS researcher community. We formulated propositions to empirically examine the multi-level relationships between personal drivers and the resulting complex network organization of the IS community. Our propositions are refined with qualitative interviews and tested using a survey. This process revealed a collaborative research culture with several individual dispositions, including a strategic structural focus, a cognitive focus and a relational focus. These exist among actors displaying a range of differing behaviours such as active engagement and passive serendipity. Our study indicates individual differences at the conception stage of engaging in academic collaboration impact on the resulting network-level configuration. We identified that regional preference, maturity life cycles and lack of small-world properties highlight the important role of senior members as structural backbones and brokers within the IS community.

    LanguageEnglish
    JournalEuropean Journal of Information Systems
    Volume22
    Issue number3
    Pages317–335
    ISSN0960-085X
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 2013

    Keywords

      Cite this

      @article{c209b7124bdc417d8505875d73ca520d,
      title = "Sympathy or Strategy: Social Capital Drivers for Collaborative Contributions to the IS Community",
      abstract = "Despite growing interest in delineating the social identity of Information Systems (IS) research and the network structures of its scholarly community, little is known about how the IS community network is shaped by individual conceptions and what motivates IS researchers to engage in research collaboration. Using an exploratory theoretical framework that is based on three dimensions of social capital theory, we examined 32 years of scientific co-authorship in an international IS researcher community. We formulated propositions to empirically examine the multi-level relationships between personal drivers and the resulting complex network organization of the IS community. Our propositions are refined with qualitative interviews and tested using a survey. This process revealed a collaborative research culture with several individual dispositions, including a strategic structural focus, a cognitive focus and a relational focus. These exist among actors displaying a range of differing behaviours such as active engagement and passive serendipity. Our study indicates individual differences at the conception stage of engaging in academic collaboration impact on the resulting network-level configuration. We identified that regional preference, maturity life cycles and lack of small-world properties highlight the important role of senior members as structural backbones and brokers within the IS community.",
      keywords = "Co-authorship, Collaboration dispositions, Dynamic network analysis, IRIS research community, Social capital",
      author = "Matthias Trier and Judith Molka-Danielsen",
      year = "2013",
      month = "5",
      doi = "10.1057/ejis.2012.27",
      language = "English",
      volume = "22",
      pages = "317–335",
      journal = "European Journal of Information Systems",
      issn = "0960-085X",
      publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
      number = "3",

      }

      Sympathy or Strategy : Social Capital Drivers for Collaborative Contributions to the IS Community . / Trier, Matthias; Molka-Danielsen, Judith.

      In: European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 22, No. 3, 05.2013, p. 317–335.

      Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

      TY - JOUR

      T1 - Sympathy or Strategy

      T2 - European Journal of Information Systems

      AU - Trier,Matthias

      AU - Molka-Danielsen,Judith

      PY - 2013/5

      Y1 - 2013/5

      N2 - Despite growing interest in delineating the social identity of Information Systems (IS) research and the network structures of its scholarly community, little is known about how the IS community network is shaped by individual conceptions and what motivates IS researchers to engage in research collaboration. Using an exploratory theoretical framework that is based on three dimensions of social capital theory, we examined 32 years of scientific co-authorship in an international IS researcher community. We formulated propositions to empirically examine the multi-level relationships between personal drivers and the resulting complex network organization of the IS community. Our propositions are refined with qualitative interviews and tested using a survey. This process revealed a collaborative research culture with several individual dispositions, including a strategic structural focus, a cognitive focus and a relational focus. These exist among actors displaying a range of differing behaviours such as active engagement and passive serendipity. Our study indicates individual differences at the conception stage of engaging in academic collaboration impact on the resulting network-level configuration. We identified that regional preference, maturity life cycles and lack of small-world properties highlight the important role of senior members as structural backbones and brokers within the IS community.

      AB - Despite growing interest in delineating the social identity of Information Systems (IS) research and the network structures of its scholarly community, little is known about how the IS community network is shaped by individual conceptions and what motivates IS researchers to engage in research collaboration. Using an exploratory theoretical framework that is based on three dimensions of social capital theory, we examined 32 years of scientific co-authorship in an international IS researcher community. We formulated propositions to empirically examine the multi-level relationships between personal drivers and the resulting complex network organization of the IS community. Our propositions are refined with qualitative interviews and tested using a survey. This process revealed a collaborative research culture with several individual dispositions, including a strategic structural focus, a cognitive focus and a relational focus. These exist among actors displaying a range of differing behaviours such as active engagement and passive serendipity. Our study indicates individual differences at the conception stage of engaging in academic collaboration impact on the resulting network-level configuration. We identified that regional preference, maturity life cycles and lack of small-world properties highlight the important role of senior members as structural backbones and brokers within the IS community.

      KW - Co-authorship

      KW - Collaboration dispositions

      KW - Dynamic network analysis

      KW - IRIS research community

      KW - Social capital

      U2 - 10.1057/ejis.2012.27

      DO - 10.1057/ejis.2012.27

      M3 - Journal article

      VL - 22

      SP - 317

      EP - 335

      JO - European Journal of Information Systems

      JF - European Journal of Information Systems

      SN - 0960-085X

      IS - 3

      ER -