Subversive Functionalism: For a Less Canonical Critique in Critical Management Studies

Rasmus Koss Hartmann

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Critical management studies (CMS) is increasingly recognized as a distinct and institutionalized field of research within organization and management scholarship. That institutionalization, however, has been a cause for both optimism and concern about what holds the project together and how it might develop in the future. In an effort to provide a constructive direction for further development, Spicer et al. (2009) suggest the orienting concept of ‘critical performativity’ and several tactics for realizing it. I contend that realizing a critically performative agenda is likely to be impeded by the increasingly institutionalized canon of acceptably critical perspectives in CMS, and suggest how it might alternatively be realized by expanding existing canons to include subversive readings of mainstream theory. To this end, I present a set of tactics for this sort of ‘subversive functionalism’ focused on deeper theoretical engagement and exploration of implications, alternatives and integration.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Relations
Volume67
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)611-632
Number of pages22
ISSN0018-7267
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • Canon
  • Critical Management Studies
  • Critical Performativity
  • Critique
  • Subversive Functinalism
  • User Innovation

Cite this

Hartmann, Rasmus Koss. / Subversive Functionalism : For a Less Canonical Critique in Critical Management Studies. In: Human Relations. 2014 ; Vol. 67, No. 5. pp. 611-632.
@article{6451e784c21948eaa02d9ef4a53621bb,
title = "Subversive Functionalism: For a Less Canonical Critique in Critical Management Studies",
abstract = "Critical management studies (CMS) is increasingly recognized as a distinct and institutionalized field of research within organization and management scholarship. That institutionalization, however, has been a cause for both optimism and concern about what holds the project together and how it might develop in the future. In an effort to provide a constructive direction for further development, Spicer et al. (2009) suggest the orienting concept of ‘critical performativity’ and several tactics for realizing it. I contend that realizing a critically performative agenda is likely to be impeded by the increasingly institutionalized canon of acceptably critical perspectives in CMS, and suggest how it might alternatively be realized by expanding existing canons to include subversive readings of mainstream theory. To this end, I present a set of tactics for this sort of ‘subversive functionalism’ focused on deeper theoretical engagement and exploration of implications, alternatives and integration.",
keywords = "Canon, Critical management studies, Critical performativity, Critique, Subversive functionalism, User innovation , Canon, Critical Management Studies, Critical Performativity, Critique, Subversive Functinalism, User Innovation",
author = "Hartmann, {Rasmus Koss}",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0018726713497522",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "611--632",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Subversive Functionalism : For a Less Canonical Critique in Critical Management Studies. / Hartmann, Rasmus Koss.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 67, No. 5, 05.2014, p. 611-632.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subversive Functionalism

T2 - For a Less Canonical Critique in Critical Management Studies

AU - Hartmann, Rasmus Koss

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - Critical management studies (CMS) is increasingly recognized as a distinct and institutionalized field of research within organization and management scholarship. That institutionalization, however, has been a cause for both optimism and concern about what holds the project together and how it might develop in the future. In an effort to provide a constructive direction for further development, Spicer et al. (2009) suggest the orienting concept of ‘critical performativity’ and several tactics for realizing it. I contend that realizing a critically performative agenda is likely to be impeded by the increasingly institutionalized canon of acceptably critical perspectives in CMS, and suggest how it might alternatively be realized by expanding existing canons to include subversive readings of mainstream theory. To this end, I present a set of tactics for this sort of ‘subversive functionalism’ focused on deeper theoretical engagement and exploration of implications, alternatives and integration.

AB - Critical management studies (CMS) is increasingly recognized as a distinct and institutionalized field of research within organization and management scholarship. That institutionalization, however, has been a cause for both optimism and concern about what holds the project together and how it might develop in the future. In an effort to provide a constructive direction for further development, Spicer et al. (2009) suggest the orienting concept of ‘critical performativity’ and several tactics for realizing it. I contend that realizing a critically performative agenda is likely to be impeded by the increasingly institutionalized canon of acceptably critical perspectives in CMS, and suggest how it might alternatively be realized by expanding existing canons to include subversive readings of mainstream theory. To this end, I present a set of tactics for this sort of ‘subversive functionalism’ focused on deeper theoretical engagement and exploration of implications, alternatives and integration.

KW - Canon

KW - Critical management studies

KW - Critical performativity

KW - Critique

KW - Subversive functionalism

KW - User innovation

KW - Canon

KW - Critical Management Studies

KW - Critical Performativity

KW - Critique

KW - Subversive Functinalism

KW - User Innovation

U2 - 10.1177/0018726713497522

DO - 10.1177/0018726713497522

M3 - Journal article

VL - 67

SP - 611

EP - 632

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 5

ER -