Standardization as Institutional Work: The Regulatory Power of a Responsible Investment Standard

Jeremy Moon, Rieneke Slager, Jean-Pascal Gond

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to
This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to
LanguageEnglish
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume33
Issue number6
Pages763-790
ISSN0170-8406
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Institutional Work
  • Legitimacy
  • Regulatory Power
  • Responsible Investment
  • Standardization

Cite this

@article{b5098fb8e0b04537b012fcc2231dc60a,
title = "Standardization as Institutional Work: The Regulatory Power of a Responsible Investment Standard",
abstract = "This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to",
keywords = "Institutional Work, Legitimacy, Regulatory Power, Responsible Investment, Standardization",
author = "Jeremy Moon and Rieneke Slager and Jean-Pascal Gond",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0170840612443628",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "763--790",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

Standardization as Institutional Work : The Regulatory Power of a Responsible Investment Standard. / Moon, Jeremy; Slager, Rieneke; Gond, Jean-Pascal.

In: Organization Studies, Vol. 33, No. 6, 05.2012, p. 763-790.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standardization as Institutional Work

T2 - Organization Studies

AU - Moon,Jeremy

AU - Slager,Rieneke

AU - Gond,Jean-Pascal

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to

AB - This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to

KW - Institutional Work

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Regulatory Power

KW - Responsible Investment

KW - Standardization

U2 - 10.1177/0170840612443628

DO - 10.1177/0170840612443628

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 763

EP - 790

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

IS - 6

ER -