Stakeholder Attitudes Toward and Values Embedded in a Sensor-Enhanced Personal Emergency Response System

Yngve Dahl, Babak Farshchian, Thomas Vilarinho, Jorunn L. Helbostad, Ather Nawaz, Arnhild J. Nygård, Per Bendik Wik

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper provides an empirical understanding of concerns that the application of a sensor-enhanced medical alert system, or personal emergency response (PER) system, raises from the perspective of care receivers (users) and care providers. Data were gathered in the context of a field trial of a PER system supporting both user-initiated alerts and automatic fall detection alerts. The system was tested at two residential care facilities for 3 weeks. Drawing on data primarily from post-trial group and pair interviews, we describe and compare care receivers' and providers' views on the following emerging concerns: (i) form factor and ergonomics, (ii) system feedback and user control and (iii) sensor precision and trust. Based on feedback from stakeholder groups, we discuss potential value biases, or discriminating factors, embedded in the evaluated PER system. We also discuss the implications of our findings for a value-driven design agenda for future PER systems.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInteracting with Computers
    Volume28
    Issue number5
    Pages (from-to)598-611
    ISSN0953-5438
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Keywords

    • Assistive technologies
    • Value bias
    • Values in design
    • Empirical studies in HCI
    • Personal emergency response (PER) systems
    • Ubiquitous and mobile devices

    Cite this

    Dahl, Yngve ; Farshchian, Babak ; Vilarinho, Thomas ; Helbostad, Jorunn L. ; Nawaz, Ather ; Nygård, Arnhild J. ; Wik, Per Bendik. / Stakeholder Attitudes Toward and Values Embedded in a Sensor-Enhanced Personal Emergency Response System. In: Interacting with Computers. 2016 ; Vol. 28, No. 5. pp. 598-611.
    @article{70e6219e8f894b199f8f2bc8349b39a4,
    title = "Stakeholder Attitudes Toward and Values Embedded in a Sensor-Enhanced Personal Emergency Response System",
    abstract = "This paper provides an empirical understanding of concerns that the application of a sensor-enhanced medical alert system, or personal emergency response (PER) system, raises from the perspective of care receivers (users) and care providers. Data were gathered in the context of a field trial of a PER system supporting both user-initiated alerts and automatic fall detection alerts. The system was tested at two residential care facilities for 3 weeks. Drawing on data primarily from post-trial group and pair interviews, we describe and compare care receivers' and providers' views on the following emerging concerns: (i) form factor and ergonomics, (ii) system feedback and user control and (iii) sensor precision and trust. Based on feedback from stakeholder groups, we discuss potential value biases, or discriminating factors, embedded in the evaluated PER system. We also discuss the implications of our findings for a value-driven design agenda for future PER systems.",
    keywords = "Assistive technologies, Value bias, Values in design, Empirical studies in HCI, Personal emergency response (PER) systems, Ubiquitous and mobile devices, Assistive technologies, Value bias, Values in design, Empirical studies in HCI, Personal emergency response (PER) systems, Ubiquitous and mobile devices",
    author = "Yngve Dahl and Babak Farshchian and Thomas Vilarinho and Helbostad, {Jorunn L.} and Ather Nawaz and Nyg{\aa}rd, {Arnhild J.} and Wik, {Per Bendik}",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1093/iwc/iwv036",
    language = "English",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "598--611",
    journal = "Interacting with Computers",
    issn = "0953-5438",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "5",

    }

    Dahl, Y, Farshchian, B, Vilarinho, T, Helbostad, JL, Nawaz, A, Nygård, AJ & Wik, PB 2016, 'Stakeholder Attitudes Toward and Values Embedded in a Sensor-Enhanced Personal Emergency Response System', Interacting with Computers, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 598-611. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv036

    Stakeholder Attitudes Toward and Values Embedded in a Sensor-Enhanced Personal Emergency Response System. / Dahl, Yngve; Farshchian, Babak; Vilarinho, Thomas; Helbostad, Jorunn L.; Nawaz, Ather; Nygård, Arnhild J.; Wik, Per Bendik.

    In: Interacting with Computers, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2016, p. 598-611.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Stakeholder Attitudes Toward and Values Embedded in a Sensor-Enhanced Personal Emergency Response System

    AU - Dahl, Yngve

    AU - Farshchian, Babak

    AU - Vilarinho, Thomas

    AU - Helbostad, Jorunn L.

    AU - Nawaz, Ather

    AU - Nygård, Arnhild J.

    AU - Wik, Per Bendik

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - This paper provides an empirical understanding of concerns that the application of a sensor-enhanced medical alert system, or personal emergency response (PER) system, raises from the perspective of care receivers (users) and care providers. Data were gathered in the context of a field trial of a PER system supporting both user-initiated alerts and automatic fall detection alerts. The system was tested at two residential care facilities for 3 weeks. Drawing on data primarily from post-trial group and pair interviews, we describe and compare care receivers' and providers' views on the following emerging concerns: (i) form factor and ergonomics, (ii) system feedback and user control and (iii) sensor precision and trust. Based on feedback from stakeholder groups, we discuss potential value biases, or discriminating factors, embedded in the evaluated PER system. We also discuss the implications of our findings for a value-driven design agenda for future PER systems.

    AB - This paper provides an empirical understanding of concerns that the application of a sensor-enhanced medical alert system, or personal emergency response (PER) system, raises from the perspective of care receivers (users) and care providers. Data were gathered in the context of a field trial of a PER system supporting both user-initiated alerts and automatic fall detection alerts. The system was tested at two residential care facilities for 3 weeks. Drawing on data primarily from post-trial group and pair interviews, we describe and compare care receivers' and providers' views on the following emerging concerns: (i) form factor and ergonomics, (ii) system feedback and user control and (iii) sensor precision and trust. Based on feedback from stakeholder groups, we discuss potential value biases, or discriminating factors, embedded in the evaluated PER system. We also discuss the implications of our findings for a value-driven design agenda for future PER systems.

    KW - Assistive technologies

    KW - Value bias

    KW - Values in design

    KW - Empirical studies in HCI

    KW - Personal emergency response (PER) systems

    KW - Ubiquitous and mobile devices

    KW - Assistive technologies

    KW - Value bias

    KW - Values in design

    KW - Empirical studies in HCI

    KW - Personal emergency response (PER) systems

    KW - Ubiquitous and mobile devices

    UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925575987&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1093/iwc/iwv036

    DO - 10.1093/iwc/iwv036

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 28

    SP - 598

    EP - 611

    JO - Interacting with Computers

    JF - Interacting with Computers

    SN - 0953-5438

    IS - 5

    ER -