Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-Bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to The White House

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance towards bureaucracy and the state. In this paper, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In so doing, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2019
Number of pages29
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event35th EGOS Colloquium 2019: Enlightening the Future: The Challenge for Organizations - University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Duration: 4 Jul 20196 Jul 2019
Conference number: 35
https://www.egosnet.org/2019_edinburgh/colloquium

Conference

Conference35th EGOS Colloquium 2019
Number35
LocationUniversity of Edinburgh Business School
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityEdinburgh
Period04/07/201906/07/2019
Internet address

Bibliographical note

CBS Library does not have access to the material

Keywords

  • Populism
  • Critique
  • Organization theory
  • Bureaucracy
  • Anti-bureaucracy
  • CMS
  • Trump

Cite this

@conference{1e647ea6d56b4da4ad6683f5dd5b2f6f,
title = "Speaking Truth to Power?: Anti-Bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to The White House",
abstract = "In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance towards bureaucracy and the state. In this paper, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In so doing, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.",
keywords = "Populism, Critique, Organization theory, Bureaucracy, Anti-bureaucracy, CMS, Trump, Populism, Critique, Organization theory, Bureaucracy, Anti-bureaucracy, CMS, Trump",
author = "Thomas Lopdrup-Hjorth and {du Gay}, Paul",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 04-07-2019 Through 06-07-2019",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
url = "https://www.egosnet.org/2019_edinburgh/colloquium",

}

Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-Bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to The White House. / Lopdrup-Hjorth, Thomas; du Gay, Paul.

2019. Paper presented at 35th EGOS Colloquium 2019, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Speaking Truth to Power?

T2 - Anti-Bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to The White House

AU - Lopdrup-Hjorth, Thomas

AU - du Gay, Paul

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance towards bureaucracy and the state. In this paper, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In so doing, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.

AB - In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance towards bureaucracy and the state. In this paper, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In so doing, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.

KW - Populism

KW - Critique

KW - Organization theory

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - Anti-bureaucracy

KW - CMS

KW - Trump

KW - Populism

KW - Critique

KW - Organization theory

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - Anti-bureaucracy

KW - CMS

KW - Trump

M3 - Paper

ER -