Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to the White House

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOrganization
Number of pages13
ISSN1350-5084
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • Anti-bureaucracy
  • Bureaucracy
  • CMS
  • Critique
  • Organization theory
  • Populism
  • Trump

Cite this

@article{607bc096cf0b43b5a1e07ea676780169,
title = "Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to the White House",
abstract = "In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.",
keywords = "Anti-bureaucracy, Bureaucracy, CMS, Critique, Organization theory, Populism, Trump, Anti-bureaucracy, Bureaucracy, CMS, Critique, Organization theory, Populism, Trump",
author = "Thomas Lopdrup-Hjorth and {du Gay}, Paul",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1177/1350508419830622",
language = "English",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",

}

Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to the White House. / Lopdrup-Hjorth, Thomas; du Gay, Paul.

In: Organization, 11.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to the White House

AU - Lopdrup-Hjorth, Thomas

AU - du Gay, Paul

PY - 2019/3/11

Y1 - 2019/3/11

N2 - In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.

AB - In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.

KW - Anti-bureaucracy

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - CMS

KW - Critique

KW - Organization theory

KW - Populism

KW - Trump

KW - Anti-bureaucracy

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - CMS

KW - Critique

KW - Organization theory

KW - Populism

KW - Trump

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925616074&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1177/1350508419830622

DO - 10.1177/1350508419830622

M3 - Journal article

JO - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

ER -