Social Policy Influence of the EU and other Global Actors: The Case of Lithuania

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the impact of the European Union's (EU) external dimension of social policy both in terms of discourse and practice and compares it with the social policy advisory activities of other global actors: the World Bank and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The article evaluates how far the EU's external dimension of social policy is impacting on the social reform process in a new EU Member State, Lithuania.1 The influence of the EU on Lithuanian social policy development is then compared with that of other national and international actors. Two central arguments are developed in this article. First, although the European Social model is narrow in terms of legislation, but has been broadened through ‘soft’ law. In terms of discourse, this is being transposed to the external dimension of social policy. In practice, however, this European vision has not been fully reflected in the social policy actions of the PHARE programme nor was it emphasised much in negotiations. Secondly, the article holds that the EU, as well as other actors, does have a significant influence on the social reform process in Lithuania, particularly when it coincides with the dominant discourses propagated nationally. However, this influence does not fully reflect the EU's discourse on the external dimension of social policy and is not as influential as the activities of other global actors.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPolicy Studies
Volume25
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)121-137
ISSN0144-2872
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{b8ac776e15f24487a7c5a722ee01ba84,
title = "Social Policy Influence of the EU and other Global Actors: The Case of Lithuania",
abstract = "This article examines the impact of the European Union's (EU) external dimension of social policy both in terms of discourse and practice and compares it with the social policy advisory activities of other global actors: the World Bank and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The article evaluates how far the EU's external dimension of social policy is impacting on the social reform process in a new EU Member State, Lithuania.1 The influence of the EU on Lithuanian social policy development is then compared with that of other national and international actors. Two central arguments are developed in this article. First, although the European Social model is narrow in terms of legislation, but has been broadened through ‘soft’ law. In terms of discourse, this is being transposed to the external dimension of social policy. In practice, however, this European vision has not been fully reflected in the social policy actions of the PHARE programme nor was it emphasised much in negotiations. Secondly, the article holds that the EU, as well as other actors, does have a significant influence on the social reform process in Lithuania, particularly when it coincides with the dominant discourses propagated nationally. However, this influence does not fully reflect the EU's discourse on the external dimension of social policy and is not as influential as the activities of other global actors.",
author = "{de la Porte}, Caroline and Bob Deacon",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1080/0144287042000262206",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "121--137",
journal = "Policy Studies",
issn = "0144-2872",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Social Policy Influence of the EU and other Global Actors : The Case of Lithuania. / de la Porte, Caroline; Deacon, Bob.

In: Policy Studies, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2004, p. 121-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Policy Influence of the EU and other Global Actors

T2 - The Case of Lithuania

AU - de la Porte, Caroline

AU - Deacon, Bob

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This article examines the impact of the European Union's (EU) external dimension of social policy both in terms of discourse and practice and compares it with the social policy advisory activities of other global actors: the World Bank and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The article evaluates how far the EU's external dimension of social policy is impacting on the social reform process in a new EU Member State, Lithuania.1 The influence of the EU on Lithuanian social policy development is then compared with that of other national and international actors. Two central arguments are developed in this article. First, although the European Social model is narrow in terms of legislation, but has been broadened through ‘soft’ law. In terms of discourse, this is being transposed to the external dimension of social policy. In practice, however, this European vision has not been fully reflected in the social policy actions of the PHARE programme nor was it emphasised much in negotiations. Secondly, the article holds that the EU, as well as other actors, does have a significant influence on the social reform process in Lithuania, particularly when it coincides with the dominant discourses propagated nationally. However, this influence does not fully reflect the EU's discourse on the external dimension of social policy and is not as influential as the activities of other global actors.

AB - This article examines the impact of the European Union's (EU) external dimension of social policy both in terms of discourse and practice and compares it with the social policy advisory activities of other global actors: the World Bank and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The article evaluates how far the EU's external dimension of social policy is impacting on the social reform process in a new EU Member State, Lithuania.1 The influence of the EU on Lithuanian social policy development is then compared with that of other national and international actors. Two central arguments are developed in this article. First, although the European Social model is narrow in terms of legislation, but has been broadened through ‘soft’ law. In terms of discourse, this is being transposed to the external dimension of social policy. In practice, however, this European vision has not been fully reflected in the social policy actions of the PHARE programme nor was it emphasised much in negotiations. Secondly, the article holds that the EU, as well as other actors, does have a significant influence on the social reform process in Lithuania, particularly when it coincides with the dominant discourses propagated nationally. However, this influence does not fully reflect the EU's discourse on the external dimension of social policy and is not as influential as the activities of other global actors.

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925266249

U2 - 10.1080/0144287042000262206

DO - 10.1080/0144287042000262206

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 121

EP - 137

JO - Policy Studies

JF - Policy Studies

SN - 0144-2872

IS - 2

ER -