Social Benchmarking, Policy-making and New Governance in the EU

Caroline de la Porte, Philippe Pochet

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The European Union has established an ‘open method of coordination’ (OMC) among the member states as a means of pursuing economic and employment growth coupled with greater social cohesion. The paper analyses the assumptions underlying this strategy, the manner of its operation and its implications for policy learning and for governance. It argues that the OMC has in substantial measure been inspired by the experience of EMU, but that this is a perilous paradigm on which to base social benchmarking and the OMC. Second, it argues that the dynamic development of the OMC will depend crucially on the extent of public involvement in scrutinizing the policy areas which political leaders choose for benchmarking, the best practices which they identify in other member states, and the efforts which they then make to improve national performance. The conclusion is that the OMC is likely to have substantial implications for domestic and European governance, but that these could vary depending on the manner of its implementation. Finally, the paper considers the implications of the analysis for the broader theoretical literature.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of European Social Policy
Volume11
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)291-307
ISSN0958-9287
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{e1496eed4b574157907e74a27dddd50a,
title = "Social Benchmarking, Policy-making and New Governance in the EU",
abstract = "The European Union has established an ‘open method of coordination’ (OMC) among the member states as a means of pursuing economic and employment growth coupled with greater social cohesion. The paper analyses the assumptions underlying this strategy, the manner of its operation and its implications for policy learning and for governance. It argues that the OMC has in substantial measure been inspired by the experience of EMU, but that this is a perilous paradigm on which to base social benchmarking and the OMC. Second, it argues that the dynamic development of the OMC will depend crucially on the extent of public involvement in scrutinizing the policy areas which political leaders choose for benchmarking, the best practices which they identify in other member states, and the efforts which they then make to improve national performance. The conclusion is that the OMC is likely to have substantial implications for domestic and European governance, but that these could vary depending on the manner of its implementation. Finally, the paper considers the implications of the analysis for the broader theoretical literature.",
keywords = "Benchmarking, EU policy making, Governance, Policy learning, Social indicators",
author = "{de la Porte}, Caroline and Philippe Pochet",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1177/095892870101100401",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "291--307",
journal = "Journal of European Social Policy",
issn = "0958-9287",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Social Benchmarking, Policy-making and New Governance in the EU. / de la Porte, Caroline; Pochet, Philippe .

In: Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2001, p. 291-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Benchmarking, Policy-making and New Governance in the EU

AU - de la Porte, Caroline

AU - Pochet, Philippe

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The European Union has established an ‘open method of coordination’ (OMC) among the member states as a means of pursuing economic and employment growth coupled with greater social cohesion. The paper analyses the assumptions underlying this strategy, the manner of its operation and its implications for policy learning and for governance. It argues that the OMC has in substantial measure been inspired by the experience of EMU, but that this is a perilous paradigm on which to base social benchmarking and the OMC. Second, it argues that the dynamic development of the OMC will depend crucially on the extent of public involvement in scrutinizing the policy areas which political leaders choose for benchmarking, the best practices which they identify in other member states, and the efforts which they then make to improve national performance. The conclusion is that the OMC is likely to have substantial implications for domestic and European governance, but that these could vary depending on the manner of its implementation. Finally, the paper considers the implications of the analysis for the broader theoretical literature.

AB - The European Union has established an ‘open method of coordination’ (OMC) among the member states as a means of pursuing economic and employment growth coupled with greater social cohesion. The paper analyses the assumptions underlying this strategy, the manner of its operation and its implications for policy learning and for governance. It argues that the OMC has in substantial measure been inspired by the experience of EMU, but that this is a perilous paradigm on which to base social benchmarking and the OMC. Second, it argues that the dynamic development of the OMC will depend crucially on the extent of public involvement in scrutinizing the policy areas which political leaders choose for benchmarking, the best practices which they identify in other member states, and the efforts which they then make to improve national performance. The conclusion is that the OMC is likely to have substantial implications for domestic and European governance, but that these could vary depending on the manner of its implementation. Finally, the paper considers the implications of the analysis for the broader theoretical literature.

KW - Benchmarking

KW - EU policy making

KW - Governance

KW - Policy learning

KW - Social indicators

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925577056

U2 - 10.1177/095892870101100401

DO - 10.1177/095892870101100401

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 291

EP - 307

JO - Journal of European Social Policy

JF - Journal of European Social Policy

SN - 0958-9287

IS - 4

ER -