Small Stakes Risk Aversion in the Laboratory: A Reconsideration

Glenn W. Harrison*, Morten I. Lau, Don Ross, J. Todd Swarthout

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Evidence of risk aversion in laboratory settings over small stakes leads to a priori implausible levels of risk aversion over large stakes under certain assumptions. One core assumption in statements of this calibration puzzle is that small-stakes risk aversion is observed over all levels of wealth, or over a “sufficiently large” range of wealth. Although this assumption is viewed as self-evident from the vast experimental literature showing risk aversion over laboratory stakes, it actually requires that lab wealth be varied for a given subject as one evaluates the risk attitudes of the subject. We consider evidence from a simple design that tests this assumption, and find that the assumption is strikingly rejected for a large sample of subjects from a population of college students. We conclude that the implausible predictions that flow from these assumptions do not apply to one specialized population widely used to study economic behavior in laboratory experiments.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEconomics Letters
Volume160
Pages (from-to)24-28
Number of pages5
ISSN0165-1765
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Risk aversion
  • Calibration puzzle
  • Laboratory experiments

Cite this

Harrison, Glenn W. ; Lau, Morten I. ; Ross, Don ; Swarthout, J. Todd. / Small Stakes Risk Aversion in the Laboratory : A Reconsideration. In: Economics Letters. 2017 ; Vol. 160. pp. 24-28.
@article{02ea957c5e444ab2bafa90ca7e09e779,
title = "Small Stakes Risk Aversion in the Laboratory: A Reconsideration",
abstract = "Evidence of risk aversion in laboratory settings over small stakes leads to a priori implausible levels of risk aversion over large stakes under certain assumptions. One core assumption in statements of this calibration puzzle is that small-stakes risk aversion is observed over all levels of wealth, or over a “sufficiently large” range of wealth. Although this assumption is viewed as self-evident from the vast experimental literature showing risk aversion over laboratory stakes, it actually requires that lab wealth be varied for a given subject as one evaluates the risk attitudes of the subject. We consider evidence from a simple design that tests this assumption, and find that the assumption is strikingly rejected for a large sample of subjects from a population of college students. We conclude that the implausible predictions that flow from these assumptions do not apply to one specialized population widely used to study economic behavior in laboratory experiments.",
keywords = "Risk aversion, Calibration puzzle, Laboratory experiments, Risk aversion, Calibration puzzle, Laboratory experiments",
author = "Harrison, {Glenn W.} and Lau, {Morten I.} and Don Ross and Swarthout, {J. Todd}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "160",
pages = "24--28",
journal = "Economics Letters",
issn = "0165-1765",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Small Stakes Risk Aversion in the Laboratory : A Reconsideration. / Harrison, Glenn W.; Lau, Morten I.; Ross, Don; Swarthout, J. Todd.

In: Economics Letters, Vol. 160, 11.2017, p. 24-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Small Stakes Risk Aversion in the Laboratory

T2 - A Reconsideration

AU - Harrison, Glenn W.

AU - Lau, Morten I.

AU - Ross, Don

AU - Swarthout, J. Todd

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - Evidence of risk aversion in laboratory settings over small stakes leads to a priori implausible levels of risk aversion over large stakes under certain assumptions. One core assumption in statements of this calibration puzzle is that small-stakes risk aversion is observed over all levels of wealth, or over a “sufficiently large” range of wealth. Although this assumption is viewed as self-evident from the vast experimental literature showing risk aversion over laboratory stakes, it actually requires that lab wealth be varied for a given subject as one evaluates the risk attitudes of the subject. We consider evidence from a simple design that tests this assumption, and find that the assumption is strikingly rejected for a large sample of subjects from a population of college students. We conclude that the implausible predictions that flow from these assumptions do not apply to one specialized population widely used to study economic behavior in laboratory experiments.

AB - Evidence of risk aversion in laboratory settings over small stakes leads to a priori implausible levels of risk aversion over large stakes under certain assumptions. One core assumption in statements of this calibration puzzle is that small-stakes risk aversion is observed over all levels of wealth, or over a “sufficiently large” range of wealth. Although this assumption is viewed as self-evident from the vast experimental literature showing risk aversion over laboratory stakes, it actually requires that lab wealth be varied for a given subject as one evaluates the risk attitudes of the subject. We consider evidence from a simple design that tests this assumption, and find that the assumption is strikingly rejected for a large sample of subjects from a population of college students. We conclude that the implausible predictions that flow from these assumptions do not apply to one specialized population widely used to study economic behavior in laboratory experiments.

KW - Risk aversion

KW - Calibration puzzle

KW - Laboratory experiments

KW - Risk aversion

KW - Calibration puzzle

KW - Laboratory experiments

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925481602

U2 - 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.003

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85028919097

VL - 160

SP - 24

EP - 28

JO - Economics Letters

JF - Economics Letters

SN - 0165-1765

ER -