Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk

Clifford S. Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Ronen Israel, Lasse Heje Pedersen

Research output: Working paperResearch

Abstract

The size premium has been challenged along many fronts: it has a weak historical record, varies significantly over time, in particular weakening after its discovery in the early 1980s, is concentrated among microcap stocks, predominantly resides in January, is not present for measures of size that do not rely on market prices, is weak internationally, and is subsumed by proxies for illiquidity. We find, however, that these challenges are dismantled when controlling for the quality, or the inverse "junk", of a firm. A significant size premium emerges, which is stable through time, robust to the specification, more consistent across seasons and markets, not concentrated in microcaps, robust to non-price based measures of size, and not captured by an illiquidity premium. Controlling for quality/junk also explains interactions between size and other return characteristics such as value and momentum.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherCentre for Economic Policy Research
Number of pages58
Publication statusPublished - 2018
SeriesCentre for Economic Policy Research. Discussion Papers
NumberDP12684
ISSN0265-8003

Keywords

  • Junk
  • Microcap
  • Quality
  • Size
  • Size anomaly
  • Size effect
  • Small cap

Cite this

Asness, C. S., Frazzini, A., Israel, R., & Pedersen, L. H. (2018). Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Centre for Economic Policy Research. Discussion Papers, No. DP12684
Asness, Clifford S. ; Frazzini, Andrea ; Israel, Ronen ; Pedersen, Lasse Heje. / Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk. London : Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2018. (Centre for Economic Policy Research. Discussion Papers; No. DP12684).
@techreport{af07741f08884698bc2891bad1a7a0a2,
title = "Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk",
abstract = "The size premium has been challenged along many fronts: it has a weak historical record, varies significantly over time, in particular weakening after its discovery in the early 1980s, is concentrated among microcap stocks, predominantly resides in January, is not present for measures of size that do not rely on market prices, is weak internationally, and is subsumed by proxies for illiquidity. We find, however, that these challenges are dismantled when controlling for the quality, or the inverse {"}junk{"}, of a firm. A significant size premium emerges, which is stable through time, robust to the specification, more consistent across seasons and markets, not concentrated in microcaps, robust to non-price based measures of size, and not captured by an illiquidity premium. Controlling for quality/junk also explains interactions between size and other return characteristics such as value and momentum.",
keywords = "Junk, Microcap, Quality, Size, Size anomaly, Size effect, Small cap, Junk, Microcap, Quality, Size, Size anomaly, Size effect, Small cap",
author = "Asness, {Clifford S.} and Andrea Frazzini and Ronen Israel and Pedersen, {Lasse Heje}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
publisher = "Centre for Economic Policy Research",
address = "United Kingdom",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Centre for Economic Policy Research",

}

Asness, CS, Frazzini, A, Israel, R & Pedersen, LH 2018 'Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk' Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.

Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk. / Asness, Clifford S.; Frazzini, Andrea; Israel, Ronen; Pedersen, Lasse Heje.

London : Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2018.

Research output: Working paperResearch

TY - UNPB

T1 - Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk

AU - Asness, Clifford S.

AU - Frazzini, Andrea

AU - Israel, Ronen

AU - Pedersen, Lasse Heje

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The size premium has been challenged along many fronts: it has a weak historical record, varies significantly over time, in particular weakening after its discovery in the early 1980s, is concentrated among microcap stocks, predominantly resides in January, is not present for measures of size that do not rely on market prices, is weak internationally, and is subsumed by proxies for illiquidity. We find, however, that these challenges are dismantled when controlling for the quality, or the inverse "junk", of a firm. A significant size premium emerges, which is stable through time, robust to the specification, more consistent across seasons and markets, not concentrated in microcaps, robust to non-price based measures of size, and not captured by an illiquidity premium. Controlling for quality/junk also explains interactions between size and other return characteristics such as value and momentum.

AB - The size premium has been challenged along many fronts: it has a weak historical record, varies significantly over time, in particular weakening after its discovery in the early 1980s, is concentrated among microcap stocks, predominantly resides in January, is not present for measures of size that do not rely on market prices, is weak internationally, and is subsumed by proxies for illiquidity. We find, however, that these challenges are dismantled when controlling for the quality, or the inverse "junk", of a firm. A significant size premium emerges, which is stable through time, robust to the specification, more consistent across seasons and markets, not concentrated in microcaps, robust to non-price based measures of size, and not captured by an illiquidity premium. Controlling for quality/junk also explains interactions between size and other return characteristics such as value and momentum.

KW - Junk

KW - Microcap

KW - Quality

KW - Size

KW - Size anomaly

KW - Size effect

KW - Small cap

KW - Junk

KW - Microcap

KW - Quality

KW - Size

KW - Size anomaly

KW - Size effect

KW - Small cap

M3 - Working paper

BT - Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk

PB - Centre for Economic Policy Research

CY - London

ER -

Asness CS, Frazzini A, Israel R, Pedersen LH. Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. 2018.