Silences and Voices of Fear, Anger, and Rationality: Emotionologies in an Information Systems Project

Riitta Hekkala, Mari-Klara Stein

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: This study examines emotionologies (Stearns & Stearns, 1985), that is, attitudes that members of an inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) project hold toward emotions and their appropriate expression and regulation in this project. In order to understand attitudes toward emotions and emotion regulation, we suggest the adoption of the concept of emotion structure, consisting of emotion rules and resources (Callahan, 2004).
    Methodology/approach: To investigate the kinds of emotionologies present in this IOIS development project, we have chosen a qualitative case study approach. Our data consists of 41 qualitative interviews, collected in two phases.
    Findings: We trace how emotion rules and corresponding emotion regulation strategies change among the sub-groups working in the project throughout their first year of collaborating. We show that organizational actors are skilled emotion managers, whose behavior is guided not only by many collective emotion rules (professional, organizational, social) but also by personal emotion rules. Our findings also suggest the need to critically reflect on certain emotion rules, such as those pertaining to the expression of fear and anger, and their potential positive and negative implications on project work.
    Research implications: We argue that group emotionologies with their professional, organizational, and social emotion rules interact with personal emotion rules, resulting in interesting emotion regulation strategies that often try to minimize emotional dissonance, sometimes at the expense of risking open conflict among project members. With this in mind, one theoretical and practical suggestion is to further explore the potential constructive implications of experiencing and expressing fear in projects.
    Purpose: This study examines emotionologies (Stearns & Stearns, 1985), that is, attitudes that members of an inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) project hold toward emotions and their appropriate expression and regulation in this project. In order to understand attitudes toward emotions and emotion regulation, we suggest the adoption of the concept of emotion structure, consisting of emotion rules and resources (Callahan, 2004).
    Methodology/approach: To investigate the kinds of emotionologies present in this IOIS development project, we have chosen a qualitative case study approach. Our data consists of 41 qualitative interviews, collected in two phases.
    Findings: We trace how emotion rules and corresponding emotion regulation strategies change among the sub-groups working in the project throughout their first year of collaborating. We show that organizational actors are skilled emotion managers, whose behavior is guided not only by many collective emotion rules (professional, organizational, social) but also by personal emotion rules. Our findings also suggest the need to critically reflect on certain emotion rules, such as those pertaining to the expression of fear and anger, and their potential positive and negative implications on project work.
    Research implications: We argue that group emotionologies with their professional, organizational, and social emotion rules interact with personal emotion rules, resulting in interesting emotion regulation strategies that often try to minimize emotional dissonance, sometimes at the expense of risking open conflict among project members. With this in mind, one theoretical and practical suggestion is to further explore the potential constructive implications of experiencing and expressing fear in projects.
    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationEmotions and Organizational Governance
    EditorsNeal M. Ashkanasy, Charmine E. J. Härtel, Wilfred J. Zerbe
    Place of PublicationBingley
    PublisherEmerald Group Publishing
    Date2016
    Pages381-408
    Chapter14
    ISBN (Print)9781785609985
    ISBN (Electronic)9781785609978
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2016
    SeriesResearch on Emotion in Organizations
    Volume12
    ISSN1746-9791

    Keywords

    • Emotionology
    • Emotion rules
    • Emotion resources
    • Emotion regulation
    • Case study
    • Inter-organizational information systems project

    Cite this

    Hekkala, R., & Stein, M-K. (2016). Silences and Voices of Fear, Anger, and Rationality: Emotionologies in an Information Systems Project. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E. J. Härtel, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions and Organizational Governance (pp. 381-408). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. Research on Emotion in Organizations, Vol.. 12, DOI: 10.1108/S1746-979120160000012012
    Hekkala, Riitta ; Stein, Mari-Klara. / Silences and Voices of Fear, Anger, and Rationality : Emotionologies in an Information Systems Project. Emotions and Organizational Governance. editor / Neal M. Ashkanasy ; Charmine E. J. Härtel ; Wilfred J. Zerbe. Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing, 2016. pp. 381-408 (Research on Emotion in Organizations, ???volume??? 12).
    @inbook{3309a1f28e19498caf01402b20c76566,
    title = "Silences and Voices of Fear, Anger, and Rationality: Emotionologies in an Information Systems Project",
    abstract = "Purpose: This study examines emotionologies (Stearns & Stearns, 1985), that is, attitudes that members of an inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) project hold toward emotions and their appropriate expression and regulation in this project. In order to understand attitudes toward emotions and emotion regulation, we suggest the adoption of the concept of emotion structure, consisting of emotion rules and resources (Callahan, 2004).Methodology/approach: To investigate the kinds of emotionologies present in this IOIS development project, we have chosen a qualitative case study approach. Our data consists of 41 qualitative interviews, collected in two phases.Findings: We trace how emotion rules and corresponding emotion regulation strategies change among the sub-groups working in the project throughout their first year of collaborating. We show that organizational actors are skilled emotion managers, whose behavior is guided not only by many collective emotion rules (professional, organizational, social) but also by personal emotion rules. Our findings also suggest the need to critically reflect on certain emotion rules, such as those pertaining to the expression of fear and anger, and their potential positive and negative implications on project work.Research implications: We argue that group emotionologies with their professional, organizational, and social emotion rules interact with personal emotion rules, resulting in interesting emotion regulation strategies that often try to minimize emotional dissonance, sometimes at the expense of risking open conflict among project members. With this in mind, one theoretical and practical suggestion is to further explore the potential constructive implications of experiencing and expressing fear in projects.",
    keywords = "Emotionology, Emotion rules, Emotion resources, Emotion regulation, Case study, Inter-organizational information systems project, Emotionology, Emotion rules, Emotion resources, Emotion regulation, Case study, Inter-organizational information systems project",
    author = "Riitta Hekkala and Mari-Klara Stein",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1108/S1746-979120160000012012",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781785609985",
    pages = "381--408",
    editor = "Ashkanasy, {Neal M.} and H{\"a}rtel, {Charmine E. J.} and Zerbe, {Wilfred J.}",
    booktitle = "Emotions and Organizational Governance",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    Hekkala, R & Stein, M-K 2016, Silences and Voices of Fear, Anger, and Rationality: Emotionologies in an Information Systems Project. in NM Ashkanasy, CEJ Härtel & WJ Zerbe (eds), Emotions and Organizational Governance. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, Research on Emotion in Organizations, vol. 12, pp. 381-408. DOI: 10.1108/S1746-979120160000012012

    Silences and Voices of Fear, Anger, and Rationality : Emotionologies in an Information Systems Project. / Hekkala, Riitta; Stein, Mari-Klara.

    Emotions and Organizational Governance. ed. / Neal M. Ashkanasy; Charmine E. J. Härtel; Wilfred J. Zerbe. Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing, 2016. p. 381-408.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Silences and Voices of Fear, Anger, and Rationality

    T2 - Emotionologies in an Information Systems Project

    AU - Hekkala,Riitta

    AU - Stein,Mari-Klara

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Purpose: This study examines emotionologies (Stearns & Stearns, 1985), that is, attitudes that members of an inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) project hold toward emotions and their appropriate expression and regulation in this project. In order to understand attitudes toward emotions and emotion regulation, we suggest the adoption of the concept of emotion structure, consisting of emotion rules and resources (Callahan, 2004).Methodology/approach: To investigate the kinds of emotionologies present in this IOIS development project, we have chosen a qualitative case study approach. Our data consists of 41 qualitative interviews, collected in two phases.Findings: We trace how emotion rules and corresponding emotion regulation strategies change among the sub-groups working in the project throughout their first year of collaborating. We show that organizational actors are skilled emotion managers, whose behavior is guided not only by many collective emotion rules (professional, organizational, social) but also by personal emotion rules. Our findings also suggest the need to critically reflect on certain emotion rules, such as those pertaining to the expression of fear and anger, and their potential positive and negative implications on project work.Research implications: We argue that group emotionologies with their professional, organizational, and social emotion rules interact with personal emotion rules, resulting in interesting emotion regulation strategies that often try to minimize emotional dissonance, sometimes at the expense of risking open conflict among project members. With this in mind, one theoretical and practical suggestion is to further explore the potential constructive implications of experiencing and expressing fear in projects.

    AB - Purpose: This study examines emotionologies (Stearns & Stearns, 1985), that is, attitudes that members of an inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) project hold toward emotions and their appropriate expression and regulation in this project. In order to understand attitudes toward emotions and emotion regulation, we suggest the adoption of the concept of emotion structure, consisting of emotion rules and resources (Callahan, 2004).Methodology/approach: To investigate the kinds of emotionologies present in this IOIS development project, we have chosen a qualitative case study approach. Our data consists of 41 qualitative interviews, collected in two phases.Findings: We trace how emotion rules and corresponding emotion regulation strategies change among the sub-groups working in the project throughout their first year of collaborating. We show that organizational actors are skilled emotion managers, whose behavior is guided not only by many collective emotion rules (professional, organizational, social) but also by personal emotion rules. Our findings also suggest the need to critically reflect on certain emotion rules, such as those pertaining to the expression of fear and anger, and their potential positive and negative implications on project work.Research implications: We argue that group emotionologies with their professional, organizational, and social emotion rules interact with personal emotion rules, resulting in interesting emotion regulation strategies that often try to minimize emotional dissonance, sometimes at the expense of risking open conflict among project members. With this in mind, one theoretical and practical suggestion is to further explore the potential constructive implications of experiencing and expressing fear in projects.

    KW - Emotionology

    KW - Emotion rules

    KW - Emotion resources

    KW - Emotion regulation

    KW - Case study

    KW - Inter-organizational information systems project

    KW - Emotionology

    KW - Emotion rules

    KW - Emotion resources

    KW - Emotion regulation

    KW - Case study

    KW - Inter-organizational information systems project

    UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000221712

    U2 - 10.1108/S1746-979120160000012012

    DO - 10.1108/S1746-979120160000012012

    M3 - Book chapter

    SN - 9781785609985

    SP - 381

    EP - 408

    BT - Emotions and Organizational Governance

    PB - Emerald Group Publishing

    CY - Bingley

    ER -

    Hekkala R, Stein M-K. Silences and Voices of Fear, Anger, and Rationality: Emotionologies in an Information Systems Project. In Ashkanasy NM, Härtel CEJ, Zerbe WJ, editors, Emotions and Organizational Governance. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. 2016. p. 381-408. (Research on Emotion in Organizations, Vol. 12). Available from, DOI: 10.1108/S1746-979120160000012012