Setting Limits for the Principle of Equal Entitlement to Continued Life

Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, Lars Peter Østerdal*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The normative principle that every individual is equally entitled to continued life is a subject of debate in ethics, health economics and policy. We reconsider this principle in the context of setting priorities for healthcare interventions. When applied without restriction, the principle overlooks quality of life concerns entirely. However, we contend that it remains ethically relevant in certain situations, particularly when patients suffer from conditions unrelated to the therapeutic areas and treatments under consideration. Thus, we defend the principle while also emphasizing the need for its application within tight limits.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Number of pages10
ISSN0963-1801
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 02 January 2025.

Keywords

  • Equal entitlement to continued life
  • Morbidity
  • Mortality
  • Population health
  • QALYs

Cite this