Self-Responsibility Gone Bad

Institutions and the 2008 Financial Crisis

John L. Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The rise of self-responsibility as practiced in many public policy areas was part of the more general rise of neoliberalism. A case in point is the corporate social responsibility movement. This led in the world of finance to the 2008 financial crisis thanks to various deregulatory moves beginning in the early 1980s. As such, the crisis was the product of a series of incremental institutional changes that enabled corporate self-responsibility in finance to go terribly wrong. Once the crisis hit, a number of more radical institutional changes were pursued in order to reverse the movement toward self-responsibility. This was an institutional rebalancing. This article offers some ideas about how to think about institutional change in the context of this particular corporate self-responsibility movement. It focuses first on the institutional changes that caused the crisis and then on the institutional changes that followed in an effort to minimize the severity of the crisis and reduce the possibility that another one might happen again. The basic argument is that self-responsibility is not a phenomenon that can be reduced to individual action; it cannot work properly without that action being embedded in an appropriate institutional environment. This is an argument at odds with neoliberal theory.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Behavioral Scientist
Volume63
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)10–26
Number of pages17
ISSN0002-7642
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Published online: December 12, 2018

Keywords

  • Neoliberalism
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Financial crisis

Cite this

@article{476e72843a2f40439f839f2d59289614,
title = "Self-Responsibility Gone Bad: Institutions and the 2008 Financial Crisis",
abstract = "The rise of self-responsibility as practiced in many public policy areas was part of the more general rise of neoliberalism. A case in point is the corporate social responsibility movement. This led in the world of finance to the 2008 financial crisis thanks to various deregulatory moves beginning in the early 1980s. As such, the crisis was the product of a series of incremental institutional changes that enabled corporate self-responsibility in finance to go terribly wrong. Once the crisis hit, a number of more radical institutional changes were pursued in order to reverse the movement toward self-responsibility. This was an institutional rebalancing. This article offers some ideas about how to think about institutional change in the context of this particular corporate self-responsibility movement. It focuses first on the institutional changes that caused the crisis and then on the institutional changes that followed in an effort to minimize the severity of the crisis and reduce the possibility that another one might happen again. The basic argument is that self-responsibility is not a phenomenon that can be reduced to individual action; it cannot work properly without that action being embedded in an appropriate institutional environment. This is an argument at odds with neoliberal theory.",
keywords = "Neoliberalism, Corporate social responsibility, Financial crisis, Neoliberalism, Corporate social responsibility, Financial crisis",
author = "Campbell, {John L.}",
note = "Published online: December 12, 2018",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0002764218816801",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "10–26",
journal = "American Behavioral Scientist",
issn = "0002-7642",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Self-Responsibility Gone Bad : Institutions and the 2008 Financial Crisis. / Campbell, John L.

In: American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2019, p. 10–26.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-Responsibility Gone Bad

T2 - Institutions and the 2008 Financial Crisis

AU - Campbell, John L.

N1 - Published online: December 12, 2018

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The rise of self-responsibility as practiced in many public policy areas was part of the more general rise of neoliberalism. A case in point is the corporate social responsibility movement. This led in the world of finance to the 2008 financial crisis thanks to various deregulatory moves beginning in the early 1980s. As such, the crisis was the product of a series of incremental institutional changes that enabled corporate self-responsibility in finance to go terribly wrong. Once the crisis hit, a number of more radical institutional changes were pursued in order to reverse the movement toward self-responsibility. This was an institutional rebalancing. This article offers some ideas about how to think about institutional change in the context of this particular corporate self-responsibility movement. It focuses first on the institutional changes that caused the crisis and then on the institutional changes that followed in an effort to minimize the severity of the crisis and reduce the possibility that another one might happen again. The basic argument is that self-responsibility is not a phenomenon that can be reduced to individual action; it cannot work properly without that action being embedded in an appropriate institutional environment. This is an argument at odds with neoliberal theory.

AB - The rise of self-responsibility as practiced in many public policy areas was part of the more general rise of neoliberalism. A case in point is the corporate social responsibility movement. This led in the world of finance to the 2008 financial crisis thanks to various deregulatory moves beginning in the early 1980s. As such, the crisis was the product of a series of incremental institutional changes that enabled corporate self-responsibility in finance to go terribly wrong. Once the crisis hit, a number of more radical institutional changes were pursued in order to reverse the movement toward self-responsibility. This was an institutional rebalancing. This article offers some ideas about how to think about institutional change in the context of this particular corporate self-responsibility movement. It focuses first on the institutional changes that caused the crisis and then on the institutional changes that followed in an effort to minimize the severity of the crisis and reduce the possibility that another one might happen again. The basic argument is that self-responsibility is not a phenomenon that can be reduced to individual action; it cannot work properly without that action being embedded in an appropriate institutional environment. This is an argument at odds with neoliberal theory.

KW - Neoliberalism

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Financial crisis

KW - Neoliberalism

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Financial crisis

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925376866&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1177/0002764218816801

DO - 10.1177/0002764218816801

M3 - Journal article

VL - 63

SP - 10

EP - 26

JO - American Behavioral Scientist

JF - American Behavioral Scientist

SN - 0002-7642

IS - 1

ER -