Sekundärinsolvenzverfahren nach der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung: Niederlassungsbegriff und forum shopping

Translated title of the contribution: Secondary proceedings, forum shopping and the European Insolvency Regulation

Georg Ringe

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The German Federal Supreme Court held in a recent decision that secondary proceedings according to Article 3(2) of the European Insolvency Regulation cannot be initiated where the debtor only has assets in a particular country. The requirements for an “establishment” go beyond this and require an economic activity with a “minimum of organisation and certain stability”. This decision stands in conformity with the leading academic comment and other case-law. Nevertheless, the decision is a good opportunity to stress the importance of secondary proceedings and their function to protect local creditors. This is particularly true where the secondary proceedings are initiated (as here) in the context of a cross-border transfer of the “centre of main interests” (COMI) of the debtor. The ongoing review of the European Insolvency Regulation should respond to this problem in one of the regulatory options provided.
Translated title of the contributionSecondary proceedings, forum shopping and the European Insolvency Regulation
Original languageGerman
JournalI P Rax - Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts
Volume4
Pages (from-to)330-332
ISSN0720-6585
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Bibliographical note

CBS Library does not have access to the material

Cite this