Robustness of Distance-to-Default

Cathrine Jessen, David Lando

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

817 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Distance-to-default (DD) is a measure of default risk derived from observed stock prices and book leverage using the structural credit risk model of Merton (1974). Despite the simplifying assumptions that underlie its derivation, DD has proven empirically to be a strong predictor of default. We use simulations to show that the empirical success of DD may well be a result of its strong robustness to model misspecifications. We consider a number of deviations from the Merton model which involve different asset value dynamics and different default triggering mechanisms. We show that, in general, DD is successful in ranking firms’ default probabilities, even if the underlying model assumptions are altered. A possibility of large jumps in asset value or stochastic volatility challenge the robustness of DD. We propose a volatility adjustment of the distance-to-default measure that significantly improves the ranking of firms with stochastic volatility, but this measure is less robust to model misspecifications than DD.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Banking & Finance
Volume50
Pages (from-to)493–505
Number of pages13
ISSN0378-4266
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

Cite this

Jessen, Cathrine ; Lando, David. / Robustness of Distance-to-Default. In: Journal of Banking & Finance. 2015 ; Vol. 50. pp. 493–505.
@article{adda1f703bf5437a8a34e77e1946b136,
title = "Robustness of Distance-to-Default",
abstract = "Distance-to-default (DD) is a measure of default risk derived from observed stock prices and book leverage using the structural credit risk model of Merton (1974). Despite the simplifying assumptions that underlie its derivation, DD has proven empirically to be a strong predictor of default. We use simulations to show that the empirical success of DD may well be a result of its strong robustness to model misspecifications. We consider a number of deviations from the Merton model which involve different asset value dynamics and different default triggering mechanisms. We show that, in general, DD is successful in ranking firms’ default probabilities, even if the underlying model assumptions are altered. A possibility of large jumps in asset value or stochastic volatility challenge the robustness of DD. We propose a volatility adjustment of the distance-to-default measure that significantly improves the ranking of firms with stochastic volatility, but this measure is less robust to model misspecifications than DD.",
keywords = "Default risk, Distance-to-default, Merton’s model, Stochastic volatility, Jump-diffusion",
author = "Cathrine Jessen and David Lando",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.05.016",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "493–505",
journal = "Journal of Banking & Finance",
issn = "0378-4266",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Robustness of Distance-to-Default. / Jessen, Cathrine; Lando, David.

In: Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 50, 01.2015, p. 493–505.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robustness of Distance-to-Default

AU - Jessen, Cathrine

AU - Lando, David

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - Distance-to-default (DD) is a measure of default risk derived from observed stock prices and book leverage using the structural credit risk model of Merton (1974). Despite the simplifying assumptions that underlie its derivation, DD has proven empirically to be a strong predictor of default. We use simulations to show that the empirical success of DD may well be a result of its strong robustness to model misspecifications. We consider a number of deviations from the Merton model which involve different asset value dynamics and different default triggering mechanisms. We show that, in general, DD is successful in ranking firms’ default probabilities, even if the underlying model assumptions are altered. A possibility of large jumps in asset value or stochastic volatility challenge the robustness of DD. We propose a volatility adjustment of the distance-to-default measure that significantly improves the ranking of firms with stochastic volatility, but this measure is less robust to model misspecifications than DD.

AB - Distance-to-default (DD) is a measure of default risk derived from observed stock prices and book leverage using the structural credit risk model of Merton (1974). Despite the simplifying assumptions that underlie its derivation, DD has proven empirically to be a strong predictor of default. We use simulations to show that the empirical success of DD may well be a result of its strong robustness to model misspecifications. We consider a number of deviations from the Merton model which involve different asset value dynamics and different default triggering mechanisms. We show that, in general, DD is successful in ranking firms’ default probabilities, even if the underlying model assumptions are altered. A possibility of large jumps in asset value or stochastic volatility challenge the robustness of DD. We propose a volatility adjustment of the distance-to-default measure that significantly improves the ranking of firms with stochastic volatility, but this measure is less robust to model misspecifications than DD.

KW - Default risk

KW - Distance-to-default

KW - Merton’s model

KW - Stochastic volatility

KW - Jump-diffusion

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921393017&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.05.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.05.016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 50

SP - 493

EP - 505

JO - Journal of Banking & Finance

JF - Journal of Banking & Finance

SN - 0378-4266

ER -