TY - JOUR
T1 - Rights-Based Approaches and Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities
T2 - Findings From a Literature Review
AU - Barletti, Juan Pablo Sarmiento
AU - Prouchet, Léna
AU - Larson, Anne M.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - This preliminary assessment of rights-based approaches (RBAs) seeks to contribute to the ongoing discussions of RBAs forIndigenous Peoples and local communities (IPs and LCs). RBAs purposefully position the recognition of, respect for, and accessto individual and collective rights as central to an initiative’s planning, design, implementation, process monitoring, and outcomes.In mainstream climate change, conservation, and development programs and policies, this means refocusing the relationshipbetween “beneficiaries” and “implementers” to one of rights-holders and duty-bearers. RBAs hold growing discursive importancein relation to the rights of IPs and LCs in conservation and climate change spheres, including the agendas of internationalagencies. The growing interest in RBAs, and their inclusion in frameworks that will guide development, conservation, and climateprojects over the next decade, is laudable. However, there are few reviews that seek to understand how RBAs emerged and howthey have been conceptualized. Such analysis is a necessary basis from which to advance discussions on the impact of RBAsand provide lessons to support them. In this review, our primary interest is the conception, conceptualization, and implementationof RBAs in forest-based initiatives, but we reviewed the wider scholarly and gray literature on RBAs in development, conservation,and climate action initiatives.
AB - This preliminary assessment of rights-based approaches (RBAs) seeks to contribute to the ongoing discussions of RBAs forIndigenous Peoples and local communities (IPs and LCs). RBAs purposefully position the recognition of, respect for, and accessto individual and collective rights as central to an initiative’s planning, design, implementation, process monitoring, and outcomes.In mainstream climate change, conservation, and development programs and policies, this means refocusing the relationshipbetween “beneficiaries” and “implementers” to one of rights-holders and duty-bearers. RBAs hold growing discursive importancein relation to the rights of IPs and LCs in conservation and climate change spheres, including the agendas of internationalagencies. The growing interest in RBAs, and their inclusion in frameworks that will guide development, conservation, and climateprojects over the next decade, is laudable. However, there are few reviews that seek to understand how RBAs emerged and howthey have been conceptualized. Such analysis is a necessary basis from which to advance discussions on the impact of RBAsand provide lessons to support them. In this review, our primary interest is the conception, conceptualization, and implementationof RBAs in forest-based initiatives, but we reviewed the wider scholarly and gray literature on RBAs in development, conservation,and climate action initiatives.
KW - Rights-based approaches
KW - Indigenous peoples and local communities
KW - Justice
KW - Equity
KW - Inclusion
KW - Conservation
KW - Climate change
KW - Rights-based approaches
KW - Indigenous peoples and local communities
KW - Justice
KW - Equity
KW - Inclusion
KW - Conservation
KW - Climate change
U2 - 10.1079/cabireviews.2023.0028
DO - 10.1079/cabireviews.2023.0028
M3 - Review article
SN - 1749-8848
VL - 18
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - CABI Reviews: Authoritative Reviews in Agriculture and Life Sciences
JF - CABI Reviews: Authoritative Reviews in Agriculture and Life Sciences
IS - 1
ER -