Repositories and Communities at Cross‐purposes: Issues in Sharing and Reuse of Digital Learning Resources

Anoush Margaryan, Allison Littlejohn

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Globally, institutions are setting up digital repositories to support the sharing of resources for teaching and learning. The educational rationale is that a single set of resources can be restructured to support different pedagogical approaches and to achieve economies of scale. A key problem is that these learning object repositories (LORs), like many other learning technology innovations, are often designed to exploit the capabilities of technology rather than to meet learners' needs. The premise of this study is that the nature and organization of a community is likely to impact the way an LOR is used. Key dimensions of repositories and communities are discussed. Three repository systems are analysed to identify how communities use repositories. Guided by Activity Theory, the LORs and user communities are analysed as activity systems. These activity systems are compared and contradictions between them are identified. From the analysis, barriers and enablers for the use of LORs to support learning are discussed and a framework for addressing the key issues in the repository development stage is proposed.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Learning
Volume24
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)333–347
Number of pages15
ISSN0266-4909
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Activity systems
  • Activity Theory
  • Learning communities
  • Learning object repositories (LORs)
  • Phenomenography
  • Socio-cultural issues in technology use

Cite this

@article{eb228403b4674c90a1997ddb6bc3a512,
title = "Repositories and Communities at Cross‐purposes: Issues in Sharing and Reuse of Digital Learning Resources",
abstract = "Globally, institutions are setting up digital repositories to support the sharing of resources for teaching and learning. The educational rationale is that a single set of resources can be restructured to support different pedagogical approaches and to achieve economies of scale. A key problem is that these learning object repositories (LORs), like many other learning technology innovations, are often designed to exploit the capabilities of technology rather than to meet learners' needs. The premise of this study is that the nature and organization of a community is likely to impact the way an LOR is used. Key dimensions of repositories and communities are discussed. Three repository systems are analysed to identify how communities use repositories. Guided by Activity Theory, the LORs and user communities are analysed as activity systems. These activity systems are compared and contradictions between them are identified. From the analysis, barriers and enablers for the use of LORs to support learning are discussed and a framework for addressing the key issues in the repository development stage is proposed.",
keywords = "Activity systems, Activity Theory, Learning communities, Learning object repositories (LORs), Phenomenography, Socio-cultural issues in technology use, Activity systems, Activity Theory, Learning communities, Learning object repositories (LORs), Phenomenography, Socio-cultural issues in technology use",
author = "Anoush Margaryan and Allison Littlejohn",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00267.x",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "333–347",
journal = "Journal of Computer Assisted Learning",
issn = "0266-4909",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "4",

}

Repositories and Communities at Cross‐purposes : Issues in Sharing and Reuse of Digital Learning Resources. / Margaryan, Anoush; Littlejohn, Allison.

In: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2008, p. 333–347.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repositories and Communities at Cross‐purposes

T2 - Issues in Sharing and Reuse of Digital Learning Resources

AU - Margaryan, Anoush

AU - Littlejohn, Allison

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Globally, institutions are setting up digital repositories to support the sharing of resources for teaching and learning. The educational rationale is that a single set of resources can be restructured to support different pedagogical approaches and to achieve economies of scale. A key problem is that these learning object repositories (LORs), like many other learning technology innovations, are often designed to exploit the capabilities of technology rather than to meet learners' needs. The premise of this study is that the nature and organization of a community is likely to impact the way an LOR is used. Key dimensions of repositories and communities are discussed. Three repository systems are analysed to identify how communities use repositories. Guided by Activity Theory, the LORs and user communities are analysed as activity systems. These activity systems are compared and contradictions between them are identified. From the analysis, barriers and enablers for the use of LORs to support learning are discussed and a framework for addressing the key issues in the repository development stage is proposed.

AB - Globally, institutions are setting up digital repositories to support the sharing of resources for teaching and learning. The educational rationale is that a single set of resources can be restructured to support different pedagogical approaches and to achieve economies of scale. A key problem is that these learning object repositories (LORs), like many other learning technology innovations, are often designed to exploit the capabilities of technology rather than to meet learners' needs. The premise of this study is that the nature and organization of a community is likely to impact the way an LOR is used. Key dimensions of repositories and communities are discussed. Three repository systems are analysed to identify how communities use repositories. Guided by Activity Theory, the LORs and user communities are analysed as activity systems. These activity systems are compared and contradictions between them are identified. From the analysis, barriers and enablers for the use of LORs to support learning are discussed and a framework for addressing the key issues in the repository development stage is proposed.

KW - Activity systems

KW - Activity Theory

KW - Learning communities

KW - Learning object repositories (LORs)

KW - Phenomenography

KW - Socio-cultural issues in technology use

KW - Activity systems

KW - Activity Theory

KW - Learning communities

KW - Learning object repositories (LORs)

KW - Phenomenography

KW - Socio-cultural issues in technology use

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925499120&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00267.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00267.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 333

EP - 347

JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

SN - 0266-4909

IS - 4

ER -