Quantifying the Trade-off between Cost-efficiency and Public Acceptance for Onshore Wind

Russell McKenna, Jann Michael Weinand, Ismir Mulalic, Stefan Petrovic, Kai Mainzer, Tobias Preis, Helen Susannah Moat

Research output: Working paperResearch


Cost-efficiency and public acceptance are competing objectives for onshore wind locations. We quantify the link between economic wind resources and beautiful landscapes with over 1.5 million ‘scenicness’ ratings of around 200,000 geotagged photographs from across Great Britain. We find statistically significant evidence that planning applications for onshore wind are more likely to be rejected when proposed in more scenic areas. Compared to the technical potential of onshore wind of 1700 TWh at total costs of £280 billion, removing the 10% most scenic areas implies about 18% lower generation potential and 8-26% higher costs. We consider connection distances to the nearest electricity network transformer for the first time, showing that the connection costs constitute up to half of the total costs. The results provide a quantitative framework for researchers and policymakers to consider the trade-offs between cost-efficiency and public acceptance for onshore wind.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationKarlsruhe
PublisherKarlsruher Institut für Technologie
Number of pages22
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2020
SeriesWorking Paper Series in Production and Energy

Bibliographical note

Earlier version titled: "Improving Renewable Energy Resource Assessments by Quantifying Landscape Beauty"

Cite this