Putting Diversity to Work: An Empirical Analysis of how Change Efforts Targeting Organizational Inequality Failed

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

464 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to critically explore why a diversity agenda in favor of equal opportunities failed despite apparent organizational support and commitment to diversity.
Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on data from a municipal center, this study inquires into how organizational dynamics of power and hierarchy influence change efforts to alter practices of inequality. The study is positioned within critical diversity research and structured around an analysis of the researcher’s fieldwork experiences.
Findings: The analysis examines into why change efforts failed despite organizational approval of a diversity agenda, open-mindedness towards change and legitimacy in regard to diversity. Paradoxically, change efforts designed to alter the status quo were, in practice, derailed and circumvented through power dynamics reproducing organizational inequality.
Research limitations/implications: A single case study in a particular type of organization constrains the generalizability but point to new directions for future research.
Practical implications: This study aims at sensitizing researchers and diversity practitioners alike to the organizational embeddedness of diversity initiatives. Accordingly, change efforts must necessarily address diversity in a situated perspective and as intersecting with key organizational power dynamics gaining impetus from macro discourses on diversity and difference.
Originality/value: Few critical diversity scholars engage with practitioners and reflect on the impact of their studies. In doing so, this paper contributes by developing diversity research, exploring the limitations and possibilities for increasing its relevance and impact.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEquality, Diversity and Inclusion
Volume35
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)296-307
ISSN2040-7149
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Critical diversity
  • Diversity management
  • Change
  • Power
  • Organizational level analysis

Cite this

@article{73962c5822984872aec9b4ef8ba9bf7a,
title = "Putting Diversity to Work: An Empirical Analysis of how Change Efforts Targeting Organizational Inequality Failed",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this article is to critically explore why a diversity agenda in favor of equal opportunities failed despite apparent organizational support and commitment to diversity.Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on data from a municipal center, this study inquires into how organizational dynamics of power and hierarchy influence change efforts to alter practices of inequality. The study is positioned within critical diversity research and structured around an analysis of the researcher’s fieldwork experiences.Findings: The analysis examines into why change efforts failed despite organizational approval of a diversity agenda, open-mindedness towards change and legitimacy in regard to diversity. Paradoxically, change efforts designed to alter the status quo were, in practice, derailed and circumvented through power dynamics reproducing organizational inequality.Research limitations/implications: A single case study in a particular type of organization constrains the generalizability but point to new directions for future research.Practical implications: This study aims at sensitizing researchers and diversity practitioners alike to the organizational embeddedness of diversity initiatives. Accordingly, change efforts must necessarily address diversity in a situated perspective and as intersecting with key organizational power dynamics gaining impetus from macro discourses on diversity and difference.Originality/value: Few critical diversity scholars engage with practitioners and reflect on the impact of their studies. In doing so, this paper contributes by developing diversity research, exploring the limitations and possibilities for increasing its relevance and impact.",
keywords = "Critical diversity, Diversity management, Change, Power, Organizational level analysis, Critical diversity, Diversity management, Change, Power, Organizational level analysis",
author = "Lotte Holck",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1108/EDI-12-2015-0107",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "296--307",
journal = "Equality, Diversity and Inclusion",
issn = "2040-7149",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "4",

}

Putting Diversity to Work : An Empirical Analysis of how Change Efforts Targeting Organizational Inequality Failed. / Holck, Lotte.

In: Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2016, p. 296-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Putting Diversity to Work

T2 - An Empirical Analysis of how Change Efforts Targeting Organizational Inequality Failed

AU - Holck, Lotte

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this article is to critically explore why a diversity agenda in favor of equal opportunities failed despite apparent organizational support and commitment to diversity.Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on data from a municipal center, this study inquires into how organizational dynamics of power and hierarchy influence change efforts to alter practices of inequality. The study is positioned within critical diversity research and structured around an analysis of the researcher’s fieldwork experiences.Findings: The analysis examines into why change efforts failed despite organizational approval of a diversity agenda, open-mindedness towards change and legitimacy in regard to diversity. Paradoxically, change efforts designed to alter the status quo were, in practice, derailed and circumvented through power dynamics reproducing organizational inequality.Research limitations/implications: A single case study in a particular type of organization constrains the generalizability but point to new directions for future research.Practical implications: This study aims at sensitizing researchers and diversity practitioners alike to the organizational embeddedness of diversity initiatives. Accordingly, change efforts must necessarily address diversity in a situated perspective and as intersecting with key organizational power dynamics gaining impetus from macro discourses on diversity and difference.Originality/value: Few critical diversity scholars engage with practitioners and reflect on the impact of their studies. In doing so, this paper contributes by developing diversity research, exploring the limitations and possibilities for increasing its relevance and impact.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this article is to critically explore why a diversity agenda in favor of equal opportunities failed despite apparent organizational support and commitment to diversity.Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on data from a municipal center, this study inquires into how organizational dynamics of power and hierarchy influence change efforts to alter practices of inequality. The study is positioned within critical diversity research and structured around an analysis of the researcher’s fieldwork experiences.Findings: The analysis examines into why change efforts failed despite organizational approval of a diversity agenda, open-mindedness towards change and legitimacy in regard to diversity. Paradoxically, change efforts designed to alter the status quo were, in practice, derailed and circumvented through power dynamics reproducing organizational inequality.Research limitations/implications: A single case study in a particular type of organization constrains the generalizability but point to new directions for future research.Practical implications: This study aims at sensitizing researchers and diversity practitioners alike to the organizational embeddedness of diversity initiatives. Accordingly, change efforts must necessarily address diversity in a situated perspective and as intersecting with key organizational power dynamics gaining impetus from macro discourses on diversity and difference.Originality/value: Few critical diversity scholars engage with practitioners and reflect on the impact of their studies. In doing so, this paper contributes by developing diversity research, exploring the limitations and possibilities for increasing its relevance and impact.

KW - Critical diversity

KW - Diversity management

KW - Change

KW - Power

KW - Organizational level analysis

KW - Critical diversity

KW - Diversity management

KW - Change

KW - Power

KW - Organizational level analysis

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000767742&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1108/EDI-12-2015-0107

DO - 10.1108/EDI-12-2015-0107

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 296

EP - 307

JO - Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

JF - Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

SN - 2040-7149

IS - 4

ER -