Public Policy and Foucaultian Critique

Towards a Happy Marriage?

Kaspar Villadsen, Mads Peter Karlsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article suggests that certain intertwinements can be discerned between contemporary public policies and post-structural thinking, emblematically represented by Foucault and scholars drawing upon his work. The article demonstrates that the post-structural perspective on power, while recognising its strengths and efficacy, confines observers to a particular form of analytical critique, which sets specific limits for what can be observed and debated. The position of Nikolas Rose is discussed with a specific attention to his diagnosis of the adoption of ‘community’ as a governmental category and his understanding of the relationship between power and critique. A significant challenge for this form of critique is the recent embracing of concepts of ‘diversity’ and ‘pluralism’, both in welfare reforms and service arrangements. Another difficulty is posed by how to engage with the material conditions of critical practice which implies analytical critique and resistance through creative self-formation. The article suggests some dislocations of the generalized Foucaultian position on public policy that seem increasingly necessary in the present situation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalReview of European Studies
Volume4
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)138-147
Number of pages10
ISSN1918-7173
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Public Policy
  • Foucault
  • Post structuralism
  • Critique
  • Diversity

Cite this

@article{b77fae898fe54c29945b9b2ed163792a,
title = "Public Policy and Foucaultian Critique: Towards a Happy Marriage?",
abstract = "This article suggests that certain intertwinements can be discerned between contemporary public policies and post-structural thinking, emblematically represented by Foucault and scholars drawing upon his work. The article demonstrates that the post-structural perspective on power, while recognising its strengths and efficacy, confines observers to a particular form of analytical critique, which sets specific limits for what can be observed and debated. The position of Nikolas Rose is discussed with a specific attention to his diagnosis of the adoption of ‘community’ as a governmental category and his understanding of the relationship between power and critique. A significant challenge for this form of critique is the recent embracing of concepts of ‘diversity’ and ‘pluralism’, both in welfare reforms and service arrangements. Another difficulty is posed by how to engage with the material conditions of critical practice which implies analytical critique and resistance through creative self-formation. The article suggests some dislocations of the generalized Foucaultian position on public policy that seem increasingly necessary in the present situation.",
keywords = "Public Policy, Foucault, Post structuralism, Critique, Diversity",
author = "Kaspar Villadsen and Karlsen, {Mads Peter}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.5539/res.v4n1p138",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "138--147",
journal = "Review of European Studies",
issn = "1918-7173",
publisher = "canadian center of science and education (ccse)",
number = "1",

}

Public Policy and Foucaultian Critique : Towards a Happy Marriage? / Villadsen, Kaspar; Karlsen, Mads Peter .

In: Review of European Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2012, p. 138-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public Policy and Foucaultian Critique

T2 - Towards a Happy Marriage?

AU - Villadsen, Kaspar

AU - Karlsen, Mads Peter

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This article suggests that certain intertwinements can be discerned between contemporary public policies and post-structural thinking, emblematically represented by Foucault and scholars drawing upon his work. The article demonstrates that the post-structural perspective on power, while recognising its strengths and efficacy, confines observers to a particular form of analytical critique, which sets specific limits for what can be observed and debated. The position of Nikolas Rose is discussed with a specific attention to his diagnosis of the adoption of ‘community’ as a governmental category and his understanding of the relationship between power and critique. A significant challenge for this form of critique is the recent embracing of concepts of ‘diversity’ and ‘pluralism’, both in welfare reforms and service arrangements. Another difficulty is posed by how to engage with the material conditions of critical practice which implies analytical critique and resistance through creative self-formation. The article suggests some dislocations of the generalized Foucaultian position on public policy that seem increasingly necessary in the present situation.

AB - This article suggests that certain intertwinements can be discerned between contemporary public policies and post-structural thinking, emblematically represented by Foucault and scholars drawing upon his work. The article demonstrates that the post-structural perspective on power, while recognising its strengths and efficacy, confines observers to a particular form of analytical critique, which sets specific limits for what can be observed and debated. The position of Nikolas Rose is discussed with a specific attention to his diagnosis of the adoption of ‘community’ as a governmental category and his understanding of the relationship between power and critique. A significant challenge for this form of critique is the recent embracing of concepts of ‘diversity’ and ‘pluralism’, both in welfare reforms and service arrangements. Another difficulty is posed by how to engage with the material conditions of critical practice which implies analytical critique and resistance through creative self-formation. The article suggests some dislocations of the generalized Foucaultian position on public policy that seem increasingly necessary in the present situation.

KW - Public Policy

KW - Foucault

KW - Post structuralism

KW - Critique

KW - Diversity

U2 - 10.5539/res.v4n1p138

DO - 10.5539/res.v4n1p138

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 138

EP - 147

JO - Review of European Studies

JF - Review of European Studies

SN - 1918-7173

IS - 1

ER -