Public Orchestration, Social Networks, and Transnational Environmental Governance: Lessons from the Aviation Industry

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This article contributes to current debates on the potential and limitations of transnational environmental governance, addressing in particular the issue of how private and public regulation compete and/or reinforce each other - and with what results. One of the most influential approaches to emerge in recent years has been that of "orchestration." But while recent discussions have focused on a narrow interpretation of orchestration as intermediation, we argue that there is analytical traction in studying orchestration as a combination of directive and facilitative tools. We also argue that a social network analytical perspective on orchestration can improve our understanding of how governments and international organizations can shape transnational environmental governance. Through a case study of aviation, we provide two contributions to these debates: first, we propose four analytical factors that facilitate the possible emergence of orchestration (issue visibility, interest alignment, issue scope, and regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty); and second, we argue that orchestrators are more likely to succeed when they employ two strategies: (i) they use a combination of directive and facilitative instruments, including the provision of feasible incentives for industry actors to change their behavior, backed up by regulation or a credible regulatory threat; and (ii) they are robustly embedded in, and involved in the formation of, the relevant transnational networks of actors and institutions that provide the infrastructure of governance.

    This article contributes to current debates on the potential and limitations of transnational environmental governance, addressing in particular the issue of how private and public regulation compete and/or reinforce each other - and with what results. One of the most influential approaches to emerge in recent years has been that of "orchestration." But while recent discussions have focused on a narrow interpretation of orchestration as intermediation, we argue that there is analytical traction in studying orchestration as a combination of directive and facilitative tools. We also argue that a social network analytical perspective on orchestration can improve our understanding of how governments and international organizations can shape transnational environmental governance. Through a case study of aviation, we provide two contributions to these debates: first, we propose four analytical factors that facilitate the possible emergence of orchestration (issue visibility, interest alignment, issue scope, and regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty); and second, we argue that orchestrators are more likely to succeed when they employ two strategies: (i) they use a combination of directive and facilitative instruments, including the provision of feasible incentives for industry actors to change their behavior, backed up by regulation or a credible regulatory threat; and (ii) they are robustly embedded in, and involved in the formation of, the relevant transnational networks of actors and institutions that provide the infrastructure of governance.

    LanguageEnglish
    JournalRegulation and Governance
    Volume12
    Issue number1
    Pages23-45
    Number of pages23
    ISSN1748-5983
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 2018

    Bibliographical note

    Published online: 9. July 2017

    Keywords

    • Aviation
    • Biofuels
    • Orchestration
    • Social networks
    • Transnational environmental governance

    Cite this

    @article{6f0b38be901045e9885b09b524e0eb10,
    title = "Public Orchestration, Social Networks, and Transnational Environmental Governance: Lessons from the Aviation Industry",
    abstract = "This article contributes to current debates on the potential and limitations of transnational environmental governance, addressing in particular the issue of how private and public regulation compete and/or reinforce each other - and with what results. One of the most influential approaches to emerge in recent years has been that of {"}orchestration.{"} But while recent discussions have focused on a narrow interpretation of orchestration as intermediation, we argue that there is analytical traction in studying orchestration as a combination of directive and facilitative tools. We also argue that a social network analytical perspective on orchestration can improve our understanding of how governments and international organizations can shape transnational environmental governance. Through a case study of aviation, we provide two contributions to these debates: first, we propose four analytical factors that facilitate the possible emergence of orchestration (issue visibility, interest alignment, issue scope, and regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty); and second, we argue that orchestrators are more likely to succeed when they employ two strategies: (i) they use a combination of directive and facilitative instruments, including the provision of feasible incentives for industry actors to change their behavior, backed up by regulation or a credible regulatory threat; and (ii) they are robustly embedded in, and involved in the formation of, the relevant transnational networks of actors and institutions that provide the infrastructure of governance.",
    keywords = "Aviation, Biofuels, Orchestration, Social networks, Transnational environmental governance, Aviation, Biofuels, Orchestration, Social networks, Transnational environmental governance",
    author = "Henriksen, {Lasse Folke} and Stefano Ponte",
    note = "Published online: 9. July 2017",
    year = "2018",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1111/rego.12151",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "23--45",
    journal = "Regulation & Governance",
    issn = "1748-5983",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    Public Orchestration, Social Networks, and Transnational Environmental Governance : Lessons from the Aviation Industry. / Henriksen, Lasse Folke; Ponte, Stefano.

    In: Regulation and Governance, Vol. 12, No. 1, 03.2018, p. 23-45.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Public Orchestration, Social Networks, and Transnational Environmental Governance

    T2 - Regulation & Governance

    AU - Henriksen,Lasse Folke

    AU - Ponte,Stefano

    N1 - Published online: 9. July 2017

    PY - 2018/3

    Y1 - 2018/3

    N2 - This article contributes to current debates on the potential and limitations of transnational environmental governance, addressing in particular the issue of how private and public regulation compete and/or reinforce each other - and with what results. One of the most influential approaches to emerge in recent years has been that of "orchestration." But while recent discussions have focused on a narrow interpretation of orchestration as intermediation, we argue that there is analytical traction in studying orchestration as a combination of directive and facilitative tools. We also argue that a social network analytical perspective on orchestration can improve our understanding of how governments and international organizations can shape transnational environmental governance. Through a case study of aviation, we provide two contributions to these debates: first, we propose four analytical factors that facilitate the possible emergence of orchestration (issue visibility, interest alignment, issue scope, and regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty); and second, we argue that orchestrators are more likely to succeed when they employ two strategies: (i) they use a combination of directive and facilitative instruments, including the provision of feasible incentives for industry actors to change their behavior, backed up by regulation or a credible regulatory threat; and (ii) they are robustly embedded in, and involved in the formation of, the relevant transnational networks of actors and institutions that provide the infrastructure of governance.

    AB - This article contributes to current debates on the potential and limitations of transnational environmental governance, addressing in particular the issue of how private and public regulation compete and/or reinforce each other - and with what results. One of the most influential approaches to emerge in recent years has been that of "orchestration." But while recent discussions have focused on a narrow interpretation of orchestration as intermediation, we argue that there is analytical traction in studying orchestration as a combination of directive and facilitative tools. We also argue that a social network analytical perspective on orchestration can improve our understanding of how governments and international organizations can shape transnational environmental governance. Through a case study of aviation, we provide two contributions to these debates: first, we propose four analytical factors that facilitate the possible emergence of orchestration (issue visibility, interest alignment, issue scope, and regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty); and second, we argue that orchestrators are more likely to succeed when they employ two strategies: (i) they use a combination of directive and facilitative instruments, including the provision of feasible incentives for industry actors to change their behavior, backed up by regulation or a credible regulatory threat; and (ii) they are robustly embedded in, and involved in the formation of, the relevant transnational networks of actors and institutions that provide the infrastructure of governance.

    KW - Aviation

    KW - Biofuels

    KW - Orchestration

    KW - Social networks

    KW - Transnational environmental governance

    KW - Aviation

    KW - Biofuels

    KW - Orchestration

    KW - Social networks

    KW - Transnational environmental governance

    UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000278740

    U2 - 10.1111/rego.12151

    DO - 10.1111/rego.12151

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 12

    SP - 23

    EP - 45

    JO - Regulation & Governance

    JF - Regulation & Governance

    SN - 1748-5983

    IS - 1

    ER -