Public Orchestration, Social Networks, and Transnational Environmental Governance: Lessons from the Aviation Industry

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article contributes to current debates on the potential and limitations of transnational environmental governance, addressing in particular the issue of how private and public regulation compete and/or reinforce each other - and with what results. One of the most influential approaches to emerge in recent years has been that of "orchestration." But while recent discussions have focused on a narrow interpretation of orchestration as intermediation, we argue that there is analytical traction in studying orchestration as a combination of directive and facilitative tools. We also argue that a social network analytical perspective on orchestration can improve our understanding of how governments and international organizations can shape transnational environmental governance. Through a case study of aviation, we provide two contributions to these debates: first, we propose four analytical factors that facilitate the possible emergence of orchestration (issue visibility, interest alignment, issue scope, and regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty); and second, we argue that orchestrators are more likely to succeed when they employ two strategies: (i) they use a combination of directive and facilitative instruments, including the provision of feasible incentives for industry actors to change their behavior, backed up by regulation or a credible regulatory threat; and (ii) they are robustly embedded in, and involved in the formation of, the relevant transnational networks of actors and institutions that provide the infrastructure of governance.

This article contributes to current debates on the potential and limitations of transnational environmental governance, addressing in particular the issue of how private and public regulation compete and/or reinforce each other - and with what results. One of the most influential approaches to emerge in recent years has been that of "orchestration." But while recent discussions have focused on a narrow interpretation of orchestration as intermediation, we argue that there is analytical traction in studying orchestration as a combination of directive and facilitative tools. We also argue that a social network analytical perspective on orchestration can improve our understanding of how governments and international organizations can shape transnational environmental governance. Through a case study of aviation, we provide two contributions to these debates: first, we propose four analytical factors that facilitate the possible emergence of orchestration (issue visibility, interest alignment, issue scope, and regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty); and second, we argue that orchestrators are more likely to succeed when they employ two strategies: (i) they use a combination of directive and facilitative instruments, including the provision of feasible incentives for industry actors to change their behavior, backed up by regulation or a credible regulatory threat; and (ii) they are robustly embedded in, and involved in the formation of, the relevant transnational networks of actors and institutions that provide the infrastructure of governance.

LanguageEnglish
JournalRegulation and Governance
Volume12
Issue number1
Pages23-45
Number of pages23
ISSN1748-5983
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2018

Bibliographical note

Published online: 9. July 2017

Keywords

  • Aviation
  • Biofuels
  • Orchestration
  • Social networks
  • Transnational environmental governance

Cite this

@article{6f0b38be901045e9885b09b524e0eb10,
title = "Public Orchestration, Social Networks, and Transnational Environmental Governance: Lessons from the Aviation Industry",
abstract = "This article contributes to current debates on the potential and limitations of transnational environmental governance, addressing in particular the issue of how private and public regulation compete and/or reinforce each other - and with what results. One of the most influential approaches to emerge in recent years has been that of {"}orchestration.{"} But while recent discussions have focused on a narrow interpretation of orchestration as intermediation, we argue that there is analytical traction in studying orchestration as a combination of directive and facilitative tools. We also argue that a social network analytical perspective on orchestration can improve our understanding of how governments and international organizations can shape transnational environmental governance. Through a case study of aviation, we provide two contributions to these debates: first, we propose four analytical factors that facilitate the possible emergence of orchestration (issue visibility, interest alignment, issue scope, and regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty); and second, we argue that orchestrators are more likely to succeed when they employ two strategies: (i) they use a combination of directive and facilitative instruments, including the provision of feasible incentives for industry actors to change their behavior, backed up by regulation or a credible regulatory threat; and (ii) they are robustly embedded in, and involved in the formation of, the relevant transnational networks of actors and institutions that provide the infrastructure of governance.",
keywords = "Aviation, Biofuels, Orchestration, Social networks, Transnational environmental governance, Aviation, Biofuels, Orchestration, Social networks, Transnational environmental governance",
author = "Henriksen, {Lasse Folke} and Stefano Ponte",
note = "Published online: 9. July 2017",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/rego.12151",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "23--45",
journal = "Regulation & Governance",
issn = "1748-5983",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Public Orchestration, Social Networks, and Transnational Environmental Governance : Lessons from the Aviation Industry. / Henriksen, Lasse Folke; Ponte, Stefano.

In: Regulation and Governance, Vol. 12, No. 1, 03.2018, p. 23-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public Orchestration, Social Networks, and Transnational Environmental Governance

T2 - Regulation & Governance

AU - Henriksen,Lasse Folke

AU - Ponte,Stefano

N1 - Published online: 9. July 2017

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - This article contributes to current debates on the potential and limitations of transnational environmental governance, addressing in particular the issue of how private and public regulation compete and/or reinforce each other - and with what results. One of the most influential approaches to emerge in recent years has been that of "orchestration." But while recent discussions have focused on a narrow interpretation of orchestration as intermediation, we argue that there is analytical traction in studying orchestration as a combination of directive and facilitative tools. We also argue that a social network analytical perspective on orchestration can improve our understanding of how governments and international organizations can shape transnational environmental governance. Through a case study of aviation, we provide two contributions to these debates: first, we propose four analytical factors that facilitate the possible emergence of orchestration (issue visibility, interest alignment, issue scope, and regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty); and second, we argue that orchestrators are more likely to succeed when they employ two strategies: (i) they use a combination of directive and facilitative instruments, including the provision of feasible incentives for industry actors to change their behavior, backed up by regulation or a credible regulatory threat; and (ii) they are robustly embedded in, and involved in the formation of, the relevant transnational networks of actors and institutions that provide the infrastructure of governance.

AB - This article contributes to current debates on the potential and limitations of transnational environmental governance, addressing in particular the issue of how private and public regulation compete and/or reinforce each other - and with what results. One of the most influential approaches to emerge in recent years has been that of "orchestration." But while recent discussions have focused on a narrow interpretation of orchestration as intermediation, we argue that there is analytical traction in studying orchestration as a combination of directive and facilitative tools. We also argue that a social network analytical perspective on orchestration can improve our understanding of how governments and international organizations can shape transnational environmental governance. Through a case study of aviation, we provide two contributions to these debates: first, we propose four analytical factors that facilitate the possible emergence of orchestration (issue visibility, interest alignment, issue scope, and regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty); and second, we argue that orchestrators are more likely to succeed when they employ two strategies: (i) they use a combination of directive and facilitative instruments, including the provision of feasible incentives for industry actors to change their behavior, backed up by regulation or a credible regulatory threat; and (ii) they are robustly embedded in, and involved in the formation of, the relevant transnational networks of actors and institutions that provide the infrastructure of governance.

KW - Aviation

KW - Biofuels

KW - Orchestration

KW - Social networks

KW - Transnational environmental governance

KW - Aviation

KW - Biofuels

KW - Orchestration

KW - Social networks

KW - Transnational environmental governance

U2 - 10.1111/rego.12151

DO - 10.1111/rego.12151

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 23

EP - 45

JO - Regulation & Governance

JF - Regulation & Governance

SN - 1748-5983

IS - 1

ER -