Pseudoerzieherische Diskurspraxis: Platons Verständnis der Sophistik

Translated title of the contribution: Pseudo-educational Discourse: Plato's Conception of Sophistry

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


    This article aims to reconstruct the normative distinction between sophistry and dialectics developed in Plato's treatment of sophistry. We begin by describing Plato's notion of sophistry as a knack of persuasion that succeeds by masquerading itself as truth-oriented and by providing gratification for its listeners. We then argue that the stringency of Plato's arguments becomes clear by using his definition of sophistry as a guideline for the interpretation of the dialogues Protagoras and Gorgias. Together, these dialogues provide a well-structured argument that questions the usefulness of sophistic practice, despite its effectiveness in attaining power within the Athenian democratic institutions. Plato's fundamental critique of sophistry differs from certain misleading prejudices against sophistry, also found in Plato's writings and challenged by historical research. The critique is therefore of lasting relevance not only to the understanding of Plato's philosophical agenda but also to the interpretation of 'the sophists'. We end by suggesting that Plato's normative distinction between sophistry and dialectics is also of relevance for our contemporary conception of democratic discursive culture and its legitimacy.
    Translated title of the contributionPseudo-educational Discourse: Plato's Conception of Sophistry
    Original languageGerman
    JournalAllgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)155-177
    Number of pages23
    Publication statusPublished - 2019


    • Dialectic
    • Gorgias
    • Plato
    • Protagoras
    • Sophistic

    Cite this