Protocol for review studies on SUMPs

Romanika Okraszewska, Dana Clarissa Muhlack, Jeroen Lakerveld, Lucia A. Reisch, Carlijn Kamphuis, Sarah Forberger

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearch

Abstract

Deliverable 6.2.1 refers to the sub-task 6.2.1: “The impact of SUMPs on adult’s transport-related physical activity levels – a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis”. The review will be prepared in months 01-15, with following PEN partners involved: 040 (lead), 026, 049 and 076.
A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) is not a uniform set of policies. Each SUMP is specifically developed for a certain city, and consists of a diverse mix of policies that, together, aim to promote active transport within that city. Therefore, SUMPs from around the world can be very different, and effects of a SUMP on transport-related physical activity (PA) will vary greatly depending on the specific mixture of policies included, and on the local context. Therefore, in order to achieve sub-task 6.2.1, i.e. “to summarize the impact of SUMPs on adult’s transport-related physical activity levels”, the involved PEN partners have decided on the following approach. We will systematically review the existing scientific literature regarding the effectiveness of transport-related policies on a modal shift from car to active transport or to public transport, or from public transport to active transport (i.e. walking or cycling). If it is possible, depending on the heterogeneity of available studies, partners will conduct a meta-analysis for specific policies for which sufficient, high-quality evidence is available. These pooled effect estimates will provide robust evidence to identify effective measures that should be prioritized in future SUMPs.
This review will be conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and will be registered in international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationBremen
PublisherLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS
Number of pages13
Publication statusPublished - 2019
SeriesPolicy Evaluation Network Deliverables
NumberD6.2.1

Bibliographical note

CBS Library does not have access to the material

Cite this

Okraszewska, R., Muhlack, D. C., Lakerveld, J., Reisch, L. A., Kamphuis, C., & Forberger, S. (2019). Protocol for review studies on SUMPs. Bremen: Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS. Policy Evaluation Network Deliverables, No. D6.2.1
Okraszewska, Romanika ; Muhlack, Dana Clarissa ; Lakerveld, Jeroen ; Reisch, Lucia A. ; Kamphuis, Carlijn ; Forberger, Sarah. / Protocol for review studies on SUMPs. Bremen : Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, 2019. 13 p. (Policy Evaluation Network Deliverables; No. D6.2.1).
@book{a30ea94865614773bf77c8397d18c52f,
title = "Protocol for review studies on SUMPs",
abstract = "Deliverable 6.2.1 refers to the sub-task 6.2.1: “The impact of SUMPs on adult’s transport-related physical activity levels – a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis”. The review will be prepared in months 01-15, with following PEN partners involved: 040 (lead), 026, 049 and 076.A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) is not a uniform set of policies. Each SUMP is specifically developed for a certain city, and consists of a diverse mix of policies that, together, aim to promote active transport within that city. Therefore, SUMPs from around the world can be very different, and effects of a SUMP on transport-related physical activity (PA) will vary greatly depending on the specific mixture of policies included, and on the local context. Therefore, in order to achieve sub-task 6.2.1, i.e. “to summarize the impact of SUMPs on adult’s transport-related physical activity levels”, the involved PEN partners have decided on the following approach. We will systematically review the existing scientific literature regarding the effectiveness of transport-related policies on a modal shift from car to active transport or to public transport, or from public transport to active transport (i.e. walking or cycling). If it is possible, depending on the heterogeneity of available studies, partners will conduct a meta-analysis for specific policies for which sufficient, high-quality evidence is available. These pooled effect estimates will provide robust evidence to identify effective measures that should be prioritized in future SUMPs.This review will be conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and will be registered in international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO.",
author = "Romanika Okraszewska and Muhlack, {Dana Clarissa} and Jeroen Lakerveld and Reisch, {Lucia A.} and Carlijn Kamphuis and Sarah Forberger",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
publisher = "Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS",
address = "Germany",

}

Okraszewska, R, Muhlack, DC, Lakerveld, J, Reisch, LA, Kamphuis, C & Forberger, S 2019, Protocol for review studies on SUMPs. Policy Evaluation Network Deliverables, no. D6.2.1, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen.

Protocol for review studies on SUMPs. / Okraszewska, Romanika; Muhlack, Dana Clarissa; Lakerveld, Jeroen; Reisch, Lucia A.; Kamphuis, Carlijn; Forberger, Sarah.

Bremen : Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, 2019. 13 p. (Policy Evaluation Network Deliverables; No. D6.2.1).

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearch

TY - RPRT

T1 - Protocol for review studies on SUMPs

AU - Okraszewska, Romanika

AU - Muhlack, Dana Clarissa

AU - Lakerveld, Jeroen

AU - Reisch, Lucia A.

AU - Kamphuis, Carlijn

AU - Forberger, Sarah

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Deliverable 6.2.1 refers to the sub-task 6.2.1: “The impact of SUMPs on adult’s transport-related physical activity levels – a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis”. The review will be prepared in months 01-15, with following PEN partners involved: 040 (lead), 026, 049 and 076.A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) is not a uniform set of policies. Each SUMP is specifically developed for a certain city, and consists of a diverse mix of policies that, together, aim to promote active transport within that city. Therefore, SUMPs from around the world can be very different, and effects of a SUMP on transport-related physical activity (PA) will vary greatly depending on the specific mixture of policies included, and on the local context. Therefore, in order to achieve sub-task 6.2.1, i.e. “to summarize the impact of SUMPs on adult’s transport-related physical activity levels”, the involved PEN partners have decided on the following approach. We will systematically review the existing scientific literature regarding the effectiveness of transport-related policies on a modal shift from car to active transport or to public transport, or from public transport to active transport (i.e. walking or cycling). If it is possible, depending on the heterogeneity of available studies, partners will conduct a meta-analysis for specific policies for which sufficient, high-quality evidence is available. These pooled effect estimates will provide robust evidence to identify effective measures that should be prioritized in future SUMPs.This review will be conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and will be registered in international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO.

AB - Deliverable 6.2.1 refers to the sub-task 6.2.1: “The impact of SUMPs on adult’s transport-related physical activity levels – a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis”. The review will be prepared in months 01-15, with following PEN partners involved: 040 (lead), 026, 049 and 076.A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) is not a uniform set of policies. Each SUMP is specifically developed for a certain city, and consists of a diverse mix of policies that, together, aim to promote active transport within that city. Therefore, SUMPs from around the world can be very different, and effects of a SUMP on transport-related physical activity (PA) will vary greatly depending on the specific mixture of policies included, and on the local context. Therefore, in order to achieve sub-task 6.2.1, i.e. “to summarize the impact of SUMPs on adult’s transport-related physical activity levels”, the involved PEN partners have decided on the following approach. We will systematically review the existing scientific literature regarding the effectiveness of transport-related policies on a modal shift from car to active transport or to public transport, or from public transport to active transport (i.e. walking or cycling). If it is possible, depending on the heterogeneity of available studies, partners will conduct a meta-analysis for specific policies for which sufficient, high-quality evidence is available. These pooled effect estimates will provide robust evidence to identify effective measures that should be prioritized in future SUMPs.This review will be conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and will be registered in international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO.

M3 - Report

BT - Protocol for review studies on SUMPs

PB - Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS

CY - Bremen

ER -

Okraszewska R, Muhlack DC, Lakerveld J, Reisch LA, Kamphuis C, Forberger S. Protocol for review studies on SUMPs. Bremen: Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, 2019. 13 p. (Policy Evaluation Network Deliverables; No. D6.2.1).