Protect the Patient from Whom?: When Patients Contest Governmentality and Seek More Expert Guidance

Kathrine Hoffmann Pii, Kaspar Villadsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article presents findings from an empirical study among patients and professionals involved in a preventive health program at a Danish hospital. It shows how patients enrolled in the program interact with health professionals in ways that challenge assumptions common to governmentality studies of prevention and health promotion. This literature has successfully explored how contemporary health promotion transgresses the public/private boundary by shaping the values of collectivities and individuals to fit better with public health objectives. By exploring the complex co-existence and intertwinements of discipline and biopolitics in preventive practices, this study eschews an interpretation that views the powers of the professional health system as invasive and one-directional. Perhaps surprisingly, the study demonstrates how patients in various ways defy a ‘patient-centered’ and empowering approach and demand to be treated medically and disciplined in a more traditional sense. The blurring of the public/private boundary, then, cannot be straightforwardly described as a result of a professional health system that, more or less subtly, reaches into the private lives of patients. A more complex picture emerges, as patients’ attitude reflect both traditional medicine and rationalities foreign to the health system.
This article presents findings from an empirical study among patients and professionals involved in a preventive health program at a Danish hospital. It shows how patients enrolled in the program interact with health professionals in ways that challenge assumptions common to governmentality studies of prevention and health promotion. This literature has successfully explored how contemporary health promotion transgresses the public/private boundary by shaping the values of collectivities and individuals to fit better with public health objectives. By exploring the complex co-existence and intertwinements of discipline and biopolitics in preventive practices, this study eschews an interpretation that views the powers of the professional health system as invasive and one-directional. Perhaps surprisingly, the study demonstrates how patients in various ways defy a ‘patient-centered’ and empowering approach and demand to be treated medically and disciplined in a more traditional sense. The blurring of the public/private boundary, then, cannot be straightforwardly described as a result of a professional health system that, more or less subtly, reaches into the private lives of patients. A more complex picture emerges, as patients’ attitude reflect both traditional medicine and rationalities foreign to the health system.
LanguageEnglish
JournalSocial Theory & Health
Volume11
Issue number1
Pages19-39
ISSN1477-8211
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Bibliographical note

CBS Library does not have access to the material

Keywords

    Cite this

    @article{d7a0e826d61749d38069f4286a637187,
    title = "Protect the Patient from Whom?: When Patients Contest Governmentality and Seek More Expert Guidance",
    abstract = "This article presents findings from an empirical study among patients and professionals involved in a preventive health program at a Danish hospital. It shows how patients enrolled in the program interact with health professionals in ways that challenge assumptions common to governmentality studies of prevention and health promotion. This literature has successfully explored how contemporary health promotion transgresses the public/private boundary by shaping the values of collectivities and individuals to fit better with public health objectives. By exploring the complex co-existence and intertwinements of discipline and biopolitics in preventive practices, this study eschews an interpretation that views the powers of the professional health system as invasive and one-directional. Perhaps surprisingly, the study demonstrates how patients in various ways defy a ‘patient-centered’ and empowering approach and demand to be treated medically and disciplined in a more traditional sense. The blurring of the public/private boundary, then, cannot be straightforwardly described as a result of a professional health system that, more or less subtly, reaches into the private lives of patients. A more complex picture emerges, as patients’ attitude reflect both traditional medicine and rationalities foreign to the health system.",
    keywords = "Preventive health, Foucault, Ethnography, Resistance, Governmentality, Atherosclerosis",
    author = "Pii, {Kathrine Hoffmann} and Kaspar Villadsen",
    note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material",
    year = "2013",
    month = "2",
    language = "English",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "19--39",
    journal = "Social Theory & Health",
    issn = "1477-8211",
    publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
    number = "1",

    }

    Protect the Patient from Whom? When Patients Contest Governmentality and Seek More Expert Guidance. / Pii, Kathrine Hoffmann; Villadsen, Kaspar.

    In: Social Theory & Health, Vol. 11, No. 1, 02.2013, p. 19-39.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Protect the Patient from Whom?

    T2 - Social Theory & Health

    AU - Pii,Kathrine Hoffmann

    AU - Villadsen,Kaspar

    N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

    PY - 2013/2

    Y1 - 2013/2

    N2 - This article presents findings from an empirical study among patients and professionals involved in a preventive health program at a Danish hospital. It shows how patients enrolled in the program interact with health professionals in ways that challenge assumptions common to governmentality studies of prevention and health promotion. This literature has successfully explored how contemporary health promotion transgresses the public/private boundary by shaping the values of collectivities and individuals to fit better with public health objectives. By exploring the complex co-existence and intertwinements of discipline and biopolitics in preventive practices, this study eschews an interpretation that views the powers of the professional health system as invasive and one-directional. Perhaps surprisingly, the study demonstrates how patients in various ways defy a ‘patient-centered’ and empowering approach and demand to be treated medically and disciplined in a more traditional sense. The blurring of the public/private boundary, then, cannot be straightforwardly described as a result of a professional health system that, more or less subtly, reaches into the private lives of patients. A more complex picture emerges, as patients’ attitude reflect both traditional medicine and rationalities foreign to the health system.

    AB - This article presents findings from an empirical study among patients and professionals involved in a preventive health program at a Danish hospital. It shows how patients enrolled in the program interact with health professionals in ways that challenge assumptions common to governmentality studies of prevention and health promotion. This literature has successfully explored how contemporary health promotion transgresses the public/private boundary by shaping the values of collectivities and individuals to fit better with public health objectives. By exploring the complex co-existence and intertwinements of discipline and biopolitics in preventive practices, this study eschews an interpretation that views the powers of the professional health system as invasive and one-directional. Perhaps surprisingly, the study demonstrates how patients in various ways defy a ‘patient-centered’ and empowering approach and demand to be treated medically and disciplined in a more traditional sense. The blurring of the public/private boundary, then, cannot be straightforwardly described as a result of a professional health system that, more or less subtly, reaches into the private lives of patients. A more complex picture emerges, as patients’ attitude reflect both traditional medicine and rationalities foreign to the health system.

    KW - Preventive health

    KW - Foucault

    KW - Ethnography

    KW - Resistance

    KW - Governmentality

    KW - Atherosclerosis

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 11

    SP - 19

    EP - 39

    JO - Social Theory & Health

    JF - Social Theory & Health

    SN - 1477-8211

    IS - 1

    ER -