Processes of Domination in the Contemporary Workplace

Managing Disputes in the Swedish Healthcare Sector

Daniel Nyberg, Christian De Cock

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explain how forms of consent-driven domination are produced over actors with critical capacity to question the processes of domination to which they are subjected. Drawing on observations of meetings during which actors evaluated employee sick leave, we show how domination is locally achieved in situated interactions by (a) constructing a specific situational reality, (b) transferring responsibilities in accordance with this reality, and (c) positioning the actors within the confirmed bounds of the situation. Domination is produced by exploiting a gap between the reified instituted reality and the lived realities of embodied actors. Doing so enables critiques of the workplace to be absorbed and situational responsibility to be directed towards individual employees. Engaging with French sociologist Luc Boltanski’s recent work, we refer to these processes as ‘complex domination’: the domination appears centre-less and well-intentioned politics result in permanent asymmetrical outcomes – that is, the same people always lose.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Sociological Review
Volume67
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)689–705
Number of pages17
ISSN0038-0261
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Boltanski
  • Discourse
  • Domination
  • Healthcare
  • Sickness absence

Cite this

@article{2100124465b24253a24cdf587b5f644f,
title = "Processes of Domination in the Contemporary Workplace: Managing Disputes in the Swedish Healthcare Sector",
abstract = "The aim of this article is to explain how forms of consent-driven domination are produced over actors with critical capacity to question the processes of domination to which they are subjected. Drawing on observations of meetings during which actors evaluated employee sick leave, we show how domination is locally achieved in situated interactions by (a) constructing a specific situational reality, (b) transferring responsibilities in accordance with this reality, and (c) positioning the actors within the confirmed bounds of the situation. Domination is produced by exploiting a gap between the reified instituted reality and the lived realities of embodied actors. Doing so enables critiques of the workplace to be absorbed and situational responsibility to be directed towards individual employees. Engaging with French sociologist Luc Boltanski’s recent work, we refer to these processes as ‘complex domination’: the domination appears centre-less and well-intentioned politics result in permanent asymmetrical outcomes – that is, the same people always lose.",
keywords = "Boltanski, Discourse, Domination, Healthcare, Sickness absence, Boltanski, Discourse, Domination, Healthcare, Sickness absence",
author = "Daniel Nyberg and {De Cock}, Christian",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0038026118825235",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "689–705",
journal = "The Sociological Review",
issn = "0038-0261",
publisher = "Sage Journals",
number = "3",

}

Processes of Domination in the Contemporary Workplace : Managing Disputes in the Swedish Healthcare Sector. / Nyberg, Daniel; De Cock, Christian .

In: The Sociological Review, Vol. 67, No. 3, 2019, p. 689–705.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Processes of Domination in the Contemporary Workplace

T2 - Managing Disputes in the Swedish Healthcare Sector

AU - Nyberg, Daniel

AU - De Cock, Christian

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The aim of this article is to explain how forms of consent-driven domination are produced over actors with critical capacity to question the processes of domination to which they are subjected. Drawing on observations of meetings during which actors evaluated employee sick leave, we show how domination is locally achieved in situated interactions by (a) constructing a specific situational reality, (b) transferring responsibilities in accordance with this reality, and (c) positioning the actors within the confirmed bounds of the situation. Domination is produced by exploiting a gap between the reified instituted reality and the lived realities of embodied actors. Doing so enables critiques of the workplace to be absorbed and situational responsibility to be directed towards individual employees. Engaging with French sociologist Luc Boltanski’s recent work, we refer to these processes as ‘complex domination’: the domination appears centre-less and well-intentioned politics result in permanent asymmetrical outcomes – that is, the same people always lose.

AB - The aim of this article is to explain how forms of consent-driven domination are produced over actors with critical capacity to question the processes of domination to which they are subjected. Drawing on observations of meetings during which actors evaluated employee sick leave, we show how domination is locally achieved in situated interactions by (a) constructing a specific situational reality, (b) transferring responsibilities in accordance with this reality, and (c) positioning the actors within the confirmed bounds of the situation. Domination is produced by exploiting a gap between the reified instituted reality and the lived realities of embodied actors. Doing so enables critiques of the workplace to be absorbed and situational responsibility to be directed towards individual employees. Engaging with French sociologist Luc Boltanski’s recent work, we refer to these processes as ‘complex domination’: the domination appears centre-less and well-intentioned politics result in permanent asymmetrical outcomes – that is, the same people always lose.

KW - Boltanski

KW - Discourse

KW - Domination

KW - Healthcare

KW - Sickness absence

KW - Boltanski

KW - Discourse

KW - Domination

KW - Healthcare

KW - Sickness absence

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925445685&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1177/0038026118825235

DO - 10.1177/0038026118825235

M3 - Journal article

VL - 67

SP - 689

EP - 705

JO - The Sociological Review

JF - The Sociological Review

SN - 0038-0261

IS - 3

ER -