Praxis, Sittlichkeit and Communicative Action

On the Connection Between Praxis, Sittlichkeit and Communicative Action in Aristotle, Hegel, Habermas and Honneth

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article in journalResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The concept of praxis is one of the most fundamental concepts in the history of political philosophy. The most famous example may be Marx’s statement in the eleventh thesis on Feuerbach. The close relation between praxis and polis was grounded in Aristotle’s political philosophy. Hegel leads this concept further with his concept of praxis as Sittlichkeit. Honneth and Habermas are both grounded in the young Hegel’s writings when they try to extrapolate what is essential in Hegel’s concept of praxis and generate a new concept, which may be valid for our time. Honneth is standing by Hegel’s concept of recognition, which he then is forced to leave many years later when rediscovering Hegel’s concept of Sittlichkeit. However, Honneth fails to reconcile praxis and Sittlichkeit. In contrast, Habermas sets in a hermeneutic maneuver language as a substitute for Hegel’s concept of spirit. With this new, effectively metaphysical concept, he is able to formulate a practical philosophy in which both praxis and Sittlichkeit are summarized in communicative action. Habermas’s practical philosophy follows Hegel's and extends its roots into the history of ideas, back to Aristotle’s foundation of the concept of praxis and, in a broader sense, to the antique democracy of Athens.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNordicum-Mediterraneum
Volume7
Issue number3
ISSN1670-6242
Publication statusPublished - 2012
EventNordic Summer University: Towards a New Ethical Imagination in Cosmopolitan World Society - Brandbjerg Højskole, Vejle , Denmark
Duration: 27 Jul 20123 Aug 2012
http://www.nsuweb.net

Conference

ConferenceNordic Summer University
LocationBrandbjerg Højskole
CountryDenmark
CityVejle
Period27/07/201203/08/2012
Internet address

Cite this

@inproceedings{07bb36ebb3b5459195d2e55ad2d300d8,
title = "Praxis, Sittlichkeit and Communicative Action: On the Connection Between Praxis, Sittlichkeit and Communicative Action in Aristotle, Hegel, Habermas and Honneth",
abstract = "The concept of praxis is one of the most fundamental concepts in the history of political philosophy. The most famous example may be Marx’s statement in the eleventh thesis on Feuerbach. The close relation between praxis and polis was grounded in Aristotle’s political philosophy. Hegel leads this concept further with his concept of praxis as Sittlichkeit. Honneth and Habermas are both grounded in the young Hegel’s writings when they try to extrapolate what is essential in Hegel’s concept of praxis and generate a new concept, which may be valid for our time. Honneth is standing by Hegel’s concept of recognition, which he then is forced to leave many years later when rediscovering Hegel’s concept of Sittlichkeit. However, Honneth fails to reconcile praxis and Sittlichkeit. In contrast, Habermas sets in a hermeneutic maneuver language as a substitute for Hegel’s concept of spirit. With this new, effectively metaphysical concept, he is able to formulate a practical philosophy in which both praxis and Sittlichkeit are summarized in communicative action. Habermas’s practical philosophy follows Hegel's and extends its roots into the history of ideas, back to Aristotle’s foundation of the concept of praxis and, in a broader sense, to the antique democracy of Athens.",
author = "{\O}jvind Larsen",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Nordicum-Mediterraneum",
issn = "1670-6242",
publisher = "University of Akureyri",
number = "3",

}

Praxis, Sittlichkeit and Communicative Action : On the Connection Between Praxis, Sittlichkeit and Communicative Action in Aristotle, Hegel, Habermas and Honneth. / Larsen, Øjvind.

In: Nordicum-Mediterraneum, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article in journalResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Praxis, Sittlichkeit and Communicative Action

T2 - On the Connection Between Praxis, Sittlichkeit and Communicative Action in Aristotle, Hegel, Habermas and Honneth

AU - Larsen, Øjvind

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The concept of praxis is one of the most fundamental concepts in the history of political philosophy. The most famous example may be Marx’s statement in the eleventh thesis on Feuerbach. The close relation between praxis and polis was grounded in Aristotle’s political philosophy. Hegel leads this concept further with his concept of praxis as Sittlichkeit. Honneth and Habermas are both grounded in the young Hegel’s writings when they try to extrapolate what is essential in Hegel’s concept of praxis and generate a new concept, which may be valid for our time. Honneth is standing by Hegel’s concept of recognition, which he then is forced to leave many years later when rediscovering Hegel’s concept of Sittlichkeit. However, Honneth fails to reconcile praxis and Sittlichkeit. In contrast, Habermas sets in a hermeneutic maneuver language as a substitute for Hegel’s concept of spirit. With this new, effectively metaphysical concept, he is able to formulate a practical philosophy in which both praxis and Sittlichkeit are summarized in communicative action. Habermas’s practical philosophy follows Hegel's and extends its roots into the history of ideas, back to Aristotle’s foundation of the concept of praxis and, in a broader sense, to the antique democracy of Athens.

AB - The concept of praxis is one of the most fundamental concepts in the history of political philosophy. The most famous example may be Marx’s statement in the eleventh thesis on Feuerbach. The close relation between praxis and polis was grounded in Aristotle’s political philosophy. Hegel leads this concept further with his concept of praxis as Sittlichkeit. Honneth and Habermas are both grounded in the young Hegel’s writings when they try to extrapolate what is essential in Hegel’s concept of praxis and generate a new concept, which may be valid for our time. Honneth is standing by Hegel’s concept of recognition, which he then is forced to leave many years later when rediscovering Hegel’s concept of Sittlichkeit. However, Honneth fails to reconcile praxis and Sittlichkeit. In contrast, Habermas sets in a hermeneutic maneuver language as a substitute for Hegel’s concept of spirit. With this new, effectively metaphysical concept, he is able to formulate a practical philosophy in which both praxis and Sittlichkeit are summarized in communicative action. Habermas’s practical philosophy follows Hegel's and extends its roots into the history of ideas, back to Aristotle’s foundation of the concept of praxis and, in a broader sense, to the antique democracy of Athens.

M3 - Conference article in journal

VL - 7

JO - Nordicum-Mediterraneum

JF - Nordicum-Mediterraneum

SN - 1670-6242

IS - 3

ER -