Pragmaticism, Science and Theology

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    315 Downloads (Pure)


    This review assesses Ashley and Deely’s claims regarding the relation of science and religion, taking Einstein’s famous statement that “science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind” as its starting point. It argues that Ashley and Deely’s book How Science Enriches Theology demonstrates that the actual problem in the contemporary dialogue between the two seem to be whether the link between science and religion shall be based on an impersonal process spirituality arising from a void or on a personalism with a personal god at the source.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalChinese Semiotic Studies
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)473–479
    Publication statusPublished - 2016


    • Evolution
    • Perennial philosophy
    • Philosophy of knowledge
    • Process theology
    • Semiotic transdisciplinarity

    Cite this