Pragmaticism, Science and Theology

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This review assesses Ashley and Deely’s claims regarding the relation of science and religion, taking Einstein’s famous statement that “science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind” as its starting point. It argues that Ashley and Deely’s book How Science Enriches Theology demonstrates that the actual problem in the contemporary dialogue between the two seem to be whether the link between science and religion shall be based on an impersonal process spirituality arising from a void or on a personalism with a personal god at the source.
    This review assesses Ashley and Deely’s claims regarding the relation of science and religion, taking Einstein’s famous statement that “science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind” as its starting point. It argues that Ashley and Deely’s book How Science Enriches Theology demonstrates that the actual problem in the contemporary dialogue between the two seem to be whether the link between science and religion shall be based on an impersonal process spirituality arising from a void or on a personalism with a personal god at the source.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalChinese Semiotic Studies
    Volume12
    Issue number3
    Pages473–479
    ISSN2198-9605
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2016

    Bibliographical note

    CBS Library does not have access to the material

    Keywords

    • Evolution
    • Perennial philosophy
    • Philosophy of knowledge
    • Process theology
    • Semiotic transdisciplinarity

    Cite this

    Brier, Søren. / Pragmaticism, Science and Theology. In: Chinese Semiotic Studies. 2016 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 473–479
    @article{74d9ac8cdfbe4cdfaf9bbe3048e80887,
    title = "Pragmaticism, Science and Theology",
    abstract = "This review assesses Ashley and Deely’s claims regarding the relation of science and religion, taking Einstein’s famous statement that “science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind” as its starting point. It argues that Ashley and Deely’s book How Science Enriches Theology demonstrates that the actual problem in the contemporary dialogue between the two seem to be whether the link between science and religion shall be based on an impersonal process spirituality arising from a void or on a personalism with a personal god at the source.",
    keywords = "Evolution, Perennial philosophy, Philosophy of knowledge, Process theology, Semiotic transdisciplinarity, Evolution, Perennial philosophy, Philosophy of knowledge, Process theology, Semiotic transdisciplinarity",
    author = "S{\o}ren Brier",
    note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1515/css-2016-0047",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "473–479",
    journal = "Chinese Semiotic Studies",
    issn = "2198-9605",
    publisher = "Mouton de Gruyter",
    number = "3",

    }

    Pragmaticism, Science and Theology. / Brier, Søren.

    In: Chinese Semiotic Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2016, p. 473–479.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Pragmaticism, Science and Theology

    AU - Brier,Søren

    N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - This review assesses Ashley and Deely’s claims regarding the relation of science and religion, taking Einstein’s famous statement that “science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind” as its starting point. It argues that Ashley and Deely’s book How Science Enriches Theology demonstrates that the actual problem in the contemporary dialogue between the two seem to be whether the link between science and religion shall be based on an impersonal process spirituality arising from a void or on a personalism with a personal god at the source.

    AB - This review assesses Ashley and Deely’s claims regarding the relation of science and religion, taking Einstein’s famous statement that “science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind” as its starting point. It argues that Ashley and Deely’s book How Science Enriches Theology demonstrates that the actual problem in the contemporary dialogue between the two seem to be whether the link between science and religion shall be based on an impersonal process spirituality arising from a void or on a personalism with a personal god at the source.

    KW - Evolution

    KW - Perennial philosophy

    KW - Philosophy of knowledge

    KW - Process theology

    KW - Semiotic transdisciplinarity

    KW - Evolution

    KW - Perennial philosophy

    KW - Philosophy of knowledge

    KW - Process theology

    KW - Semiotic transdisciplinarity

    U2 - 10.1515/css-2016-0047

    DO - 10.1515/css-2016-0047

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 12

    SP - 473

    EP - 479

    JO - Chinese Semiotic Studies

    T2 - Chinese Semiotic Studies

    JF - Chinese Semiotic Studies

    SN - 2198-9605

    IS - 3

    ER -