Powering Ideas through Expertise

Professionals in Global Tax Battles

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    122 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This contribution discusses how ideas are powered through expertise and moral authority. Professionals compete with each other to power ideas by linking claims to expertise, how things best work, to moral claims about how things should be. To show how, we draw on a case of battles over global tax policy. Corporate reporting for tax purposes is an area where the European Union, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations, large global accountancy firms and non-governmental organizations have been active. The point of contention here is what form of financial reporting multinational corporations should provide to ensure they pay their fair share of tax. Ideas powered by expertise contain shared causal beliefs, as well as principled beliefs about value systems. We demonstrate that professionals can contest the established order when demonstrations of expertise can be fused with claims to moral authority. Such a constellation is more likely when political conditions are favourable.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of European Public Policy
    Volume23
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)357-374
    Number of pages18
    ISSN1350-1763
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Bibliographical note

    Exploratory work for this piece was supported by the European Commission FP7 project, 2011 –2015, ‘GREEN – Global Reordering: Evolution through European Networks’ [#266809-GR:EEN]. Extensive research was funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 Framework Program 2015–2018 [#649456-ENLIGHTEN].
    NOTES

    Keywords

    • Accounting
    • Activists
    • Expertise
    • Ideas
    • NGOs
    • Professionals
    • Tax policy

    Cite this

    @article{9710db7156f44808a15e56ca721e8b84,
    title = "Powering Ideas through Expertise: Professionals in Global Tax Battles",
    abstract = "This contribution discusses how ideas are powered through expertise and moral authority. Professionals compete with each other to power ideas by linking claims to expertise, how things best work, to moral claims about how things should be. To show how, we draw on a case of battles over global tax policy. Corporate reporting for tax purposes is an area where the European Union, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations, large global accountancy firms and non-governmental organizations have been active. The point of contention here is what form of financial reporting multinational corporations should provide to ensure they pay their fair share of tax. Ideas powered by expertise contain shared causal beliefs, as well as principled beliefs about value systems. We demonstrate that professionals can contest the established order when demonstrations of expertise can be fused with claims to moral authority. Such a constellation is more likely when political conditions are favourable.",
    keywords = "Accounting, Activists, Expertise, Ideas, NGOs, Professionals, Tax policy, Accounting, Activists, Expertise, Ideas, NGOs, Professionals, Tax policy",
    author = "Leonard Seabrooke and Duncan Wigan",
    note = "Exploratory work for this piece was supported by the European Commission FP7 project, 2011 –2015, ‘GREEN – Global Reordering: Evolution through European Networks’ [#266809-GR:EEN]. Extensive research was funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 Framework Program 2015–2018 [#649456-ENLIGHTEN]. NOTES",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1080/13501763.2015.1115536",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "357--374",
    journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
    issn = "1350-1763",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3",

    }

    Powering Ideas through Expertise : Professionals in Global Tax Battles. / Seabrooke, Leonard; Wigan, Duncan.

    In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2016, p. 357-374.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Powering Ideas through Expertise

    T2 - Professionals in Global Tax Battles

    AU - Seabrooke, Leonard

    AU - Wigan, Duncan

    N1 - Exploratory work for this piece was supported by the European Commission FP7 project, 2011 –2015, ‘GREEN – Global Reordering: Evolution through European Networks’ [#266809-GR:EEN]. Extensive research was funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 Framework Program 2015–2018 [#649456-ENLIGHTEN]. NOTES

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - This contribution discusses how ideas are powered through expertise and moral authority. Professionals compete with each other to power ideas by linking claims to expertise, how things best work, to moral claims about how things should be. To show how, we draw on a case of battles over global tax policy. Corporate reporting for tax purposes is an area where the European Union, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations, large global accountancy firms and non-governmental organizations have been active. The point of contention here is what form of financial reporting multinational corporations should provide to ensure they pay their fair share of tax. Ideas powered by expertise contain shared causal beliefs, as well as principled beliefs about value systems. We demonstrate that professionals can contest the established order when demonstrations of expertise can be fused with claims to moral authority. Such a constellation is more likely when political conditions are favourable.

    AB - This contribution discusses how ideas are powered through expertise and moral authority. Professionals compete with each other to power ideas by linking claims to expertise, how things best work, to moral claims about how things should be. To show how, we draw on a case of battles over global tax policy. Corporate reporting for tax purposes is an area where the European Union, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations, large global accountancy firms and non-governmental organizations have been active. The point of contention here is what form of financial reporting multinational corporations should provide to ensure they pay their fair share of tax. Ideas powered by expertise contain shared causal beliefs, as well as principled beliefs about value systems. We demonstrate that professionals can contest the established order when demonstrations of expertise can be fused with claims to moral authority. Such a constellation is more likely when political conditions are favourable.

    KW - Accounting

    KW - Activists

    KW - Expertise

    KW - Ideas

    KW - NGOs

    KW - Professionals

    KW - Tax policy

    KW - Accounting

    KW - Activists

    KW - Expertise

    KW - Ideas

    KW - NGOs

    KW - Professionals

    KW - Tax policy

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925276530&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115536

    DO - 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115536

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 23

    SP - 357

    EP - 374

    JO - Journal of European Public Policy

    JF - Journal of European Public Policy

    SN - 1350-1763

    IS - 3

    ER -