Power in Global Value Chains

Mark P. Dallas, Stefano Ponte, Timothy J. Sturgeon

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Power has been a foundational concept in global value chain (GVC) research. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years as GVC research has proliferated beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages and incorporated other stakeholders and mechanisms such as NGOs, labor unions, standards, norms and conventions. In this article, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVC governance. We delineate two principal dimensions: transmission mechanisms–direct and diffuse; and arena of actors–dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power in GVC governance: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.
Original languageEnglish
JournalReview of International Political Economy
Volume26
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)666-694
Number of pages29
ISSN0969-2290
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Global value chains (GVC)
  • Governance
  • Power

Cite this

Dallas, Mark P. ; Ponte, Stefano ; Sturgeon, Timothy J. / Power in Global Value Chains. In: Review of International Political Economy. 2019 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 666-694.
@article{6af8ee1926964fc8b83ed39a5a14a02f,
title = "Power in Global Value Chains",
abstract = "Power has been a foundational concept in global value chain (GVC) research. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years as GVC research has proliferated beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages and incorporated other stakeholders and mechanisms such as NGOs, labor unions, standards, norms and conventions. In this article, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVC governance. We delineate two principal dimensions: transmission mechanisms–direct and diffuse; and arena of actors–dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power in GVC governance: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.",
keywords = "Global value chains (GVC), Governance, Power, Global value chains (GVC), Governance, Power",
author = "Dallas, {Mark P.} and Stefano Ponte and Sturgeon, {Timothy J.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/09692290.2019.1608284",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "666--694",
journal = "Review of International Political Economy",
issn = "0969-2290",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Power in Global Value Chains. / Dallas, Mark P.; Ponte, Stefano; Sturgeon, Timothy J.

In: Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2019, p. 666-694.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power in Global Value Chains

AU - Dallas, Mark P.

AU - Ponte, Stefano

AU - Sturgeon, Timothy J.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Power has been a foundational concept in global value chain (GVC) research. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years as GVC research has proliferated beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages and incorporated other stakeholders and mechanisms such as NGOs, labor unions, standards, norms and conventions. In this article, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVC governance. We delineate two principal dimensions: transmission mechanisms–direct and diffuse; and arena of actors–dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power in GVC governance: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.

AB - Power has been a foundational concept in global value chain (GVC) research. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years as GVC research has proliferated beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages and incorporated other stakeholders and mechanisms such as NGOs, labor unions, standards, norms and conventions. In this article, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVC governance. We delineate two principal dimensions: transmission mechanisms–direct and diffuse; and arena of actors–dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power in GVC governance: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.

KW - Global value chains (GVC)

KW - Governance

KW - Power

KW - Global value chains (GVC)

KW - Governance

KW - Power

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925274463&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1080/09692290.2019.1608284

DO - 10.1080/09692290.2019.1608284

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 666

EP - 694

JO - Review of International Political Economy

JF - Review of International Political Economy

SN - 0969-2290

IS - 4

ER -