Polyamory, Social Conservatism and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate in the US

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The arguments against same-sex marriage used by the Christian right and other social conservatives in the US have shifted in character. Drawing upon the work of Stanley Kurtz, they have increasingly suggested that same-sex marriage will necessarily lead to the legal recognition of polygamous and polyamorous relationships. From this perspective, the Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) had, by expanding notions of ‘sexual liberty', paved the way for the legalisation and recognition of all consenting adult relationships. The article suggests that the Christian right's increased use of consequentialist arguments rather than claims structured around biblical authority or opposition to homosexuality per se is a form of adaptation to long-term shifts in the character of US popular attitudes.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalPolitics
    Volume27
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)101-107
    Number of pages7
    ISSN0263-3957
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Cite this

    @article{7cf6ccf0405111dc98e2000ea68e967b,
    title = "Polyamory, Social Conservatism and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate in the US",
    abstract = "The arguments against same-sex marriage used by the Christian right and other social conservatives in the US have shifted in character. Drawing upon the work of Stanley Kurtz, they have increasingly suggested that same-sex marriage will necessarily lead to the legal recognition of polygamous and polyamorous relationships. From this perspective, the Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) had, by expanding notions of ‘sexual liberty', paved the way for the legalisation and recognition of all consenting adult relationships. The article suggests that the Christian right's increased use of consequentialist arguments rather than claims structured around biblical authority or opposition to homosexuality per se is a form of adaptation to long-term shifts in the character of US popular attitudes.",
    keywords = "kultur&omr{\aa}destudier, Politiske forhold, Neokonservatisme, Homoseksuelle, USA",
    author = "Edward Ashbee",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00285.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "101--107",
    journal = "Politics",
    issn = "0263-3957",
    publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
    number = "2",

    }

    Polyamory, Social Conservatism and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate in the US. / Ashbee, Edward.

    In: Politics, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2007, p. 101-107.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Polyamory, Social Conservatism and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate in the US

    AU - Ashbee, Edward

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - The arguments against same-sex marriage used by the Christian right and other social conservatives in the US have shifted in character. Drawing upon the work of Stanley Kurtz, they have increasingly suggested that same-sex marriage will necessarily lead to the legal recognition of polygamous and polyamorous relationships. From this perspective, the Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) had, by expanding notions of ‘sexual liberty', paved the way for the legalisation and recognition of all consenting adult relationships. The article suggests that the Christian right's increased use of consequentialist arguments rather than claims structured around biblical authority or opposition to homosexuality per se is a form of adaptation to long-term shifts in the character of US popular attitudes.

    AB - The arguments against same-sex marriage used by the Christian right and other social conservatives in the US have shifted in character. Drawing upon the work of Stanley Kurtz, they have increasingly suggested that same-sex marriage will necessarily lead to the legal recognition of polygamous and polyamorous relationships. From this perspective, the Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) had, by expanding notions of ‘sexual liberty', paved the way for the legalisation and recognition of all consenting adult relationships. The article suggests that the Christian right's increased use of consequentialist arguments rather than claims structured around biblical authority or opposition to homosexuality per se is a form of adaptation to long-term shifts in the character of US popular attitudes.

    KW - kultur&områdestudier

    KW - Politiske forhold

    KW - Neokonservatisme

    KW - Homoseksuelle

    KW - USA

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00285.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00285.x

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 27

    SP - 101

    EP - 107

    JO - Politics

    JF - Politics

    SN - 0263-3957

    IS - 2

    ER -