Political Theology and Historical Materialism: Reading Benjamin against Agamben

Lotte List*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    96 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Giorgio Agamben’s work on the power of sovereignty has been greatly influential in recent political thought. However, it has also overshadowed the independently original contributions of his two primary theoretical sources, Carl Schmitt and Walter Benjamin. In this article, I argue that Agamben’s political defeatism can be traced back to a double misconception in his reception of these two authors: first a formalistic reduction of Schmitt, and second a Schmittian reduction of Benjamin. Through this reduction to juridical formalism, the radicality of Benjamin’s historical materialist critique is replaced by a messianic nihilism, leading to the colonization of society by the logic of the concentration camp. Though Agamben’s theory of sovereignty and its implications for a positive political project have been contested, this origin of the decline of radical philosophy has not previously undergone a systematic critique.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalTheory, Culture & Society
    Volume38
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)117-140
    Number of pages24
    ISSN0263-2764
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2021

    Bibliographical note

    Published online: September 7, 2020.

    Keywords

    • Agamben
    • Benjamin
    • Materialism
    • Messianism
    • Schmitt
    • Sovereignty

    Cite this