Policy Ideas, Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy

John L. Campbell, Ove K. Pedersen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in ways that are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.
    Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in ways that are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalSocio-Economic Review
    Volume13
    Issue number4
    Pages67-701
    ISSN1475-1461
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • Political Economy
    • Varieties of capitalism
    • France
    • Germany
    • USA

    Cite this

    @article{e4ce8051fa9e455984cc2dd2194bc53e,
    title = "Policy Ideas, Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy",
    abstract = "Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in ways that are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.",
    keywords = "Political Economy, Varieties of capitalism, France, Germany, USA",
    author = "Campbell, {John L.} and Pedersen, {Ove K.}",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1093/ser/mwv004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "67--701",
    journal = "Socio-Economic Review",
    issn = "1475-1461",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    Policy Ideas, Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy. / Campbell, John L.; Pedersen, Ove K.

    In: Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2015, p. 67-701.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Policy Ideas, Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy

    AU - Campbell,John L.

    AU - Pedersen,Ove K.

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in ways that are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.

    AB - Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in ways that are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.

    KW - Political Economy

    KW - Varieties of capitalism

    KW - France

    KW - Germany

    KW - USA

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=111054307361010

    U2 - 10.1093/ser/mwv004

    DO - 10.1093/ser/mwv004

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 13

    SP - 67

    EP - 701

    JO - Socio-Economic Review

    T2 - Socio-Economic Review

    JF - Socio-Economic Review

    SN - 1475-1461

    IS - 4

    ER -