PhD-Research as a Marker of Science Communication’s Development

Maarten van der Sanden, Emma Weitkamp, Charlotte Autzen, Brian Trench

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

PhD-research is important in many scientific domains as it represents early development of new ideas and methods. So what does a 15-year record of science communication PhD-theses (2000-2015, N=164) tell us about the development of ideas and methods in this field? PhD-research, as represented in the projects on which we have gathered information, analyses the real world of science communication from many angles, e.g. scientists, the role of the media, museums, engagement, and generally in a descriptive, sometimes experiential, manner. The dominant form of research explains and understands the reality of science communication through surveys, observations and interviews. This leads us to the idea that PhD-theses tend to be ‘phenomenological’ and developments in PhD-research follow and explicate developments in science communication practice. This does not mean that the PhD-research bridges the gap between theory and practice, since systematically testing new insights in practice is
missing.
This panel session will start by explaining the phenomenological character of PhD-research in science communication. We will connect this record to other trend studies on science communication research (e.g. bibliographical). We will propose a ‘topographical research activity’ map of science communication that functions as a platform for discussion about scientific developments in science communication. The map is not intended to set a research agenda, but to make it easier for researchers, practitioners and students to reflect on developments and boundary issues.
A qualified PhD-researcher and science communication educator who has been studying trends in PhD theses (MvdS), a communication professional who is pursuing PhD research (CA), a PhD supervisor and research leader who is editor-in-chief of a science communication journal (EW), and a science communication researcher who has co-edited an anthology proposing a view of the best
in science communication studies over five decades (BT) will consider the issues arising from these observations and analyses.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date26 Apr 2016
Publication statusPublished - 26 Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes
Event14th Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference. PCST 2016 - Hacettepe University, Istanbul, Turkey
Duration: 25 Apr 201628 Apr 2016
Conference number: 14
http://pcst-2016.org/program/

Conference

Conference14th Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference. PCST 2016
Number14
LocationHacettepe University
CountryTurkey
CityIstanbul
Period25/04/201628/04/2016
Internet address

Bibliographical note

CBS Library does not have access to the material

Cite this

van der Sanden, M., Weitkamp, E., Autzen, C., & Trench, B. (2016). PhD-Research as a Marker of Science Communication’s Development. Paper presented at 14th Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference. PCST 2016, Istanbul, Turkey.
van der Sanden, Maarten ; Weitkamp, Emma ; Autzen, Charlotte ; Trench, Brian. / PhD-Research as a Marker of Science Communication’s Development. Paper presented at 14th Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference. PCST 2016, Istanbul, Turkey.
@conference{b611d6b63cb84daeb4a116dfddc3e374,
title = "PhD-Research as a Marker of Science Communication’s Development",
abstract = "PhD-research is important in many scientific domains as it represents early development of new ideas and methods. So what does a 15-year record of science communication PhD-theses (2000-2015, N=164) tell us about the development of ideas and methods in this field? PhD-research, as represented in the projects on which we have gathered information, analyses the real world of science communication from many angles, e.g. scientists, the role of the media, museums, engagement, and generally in a descriptive, sometimes experiential, manner. The dominant form of research explains and understands the reality of science communication through surveys, observations and interviews. This leads us to the idea that PhD-theses tend to be ‘phenomenological’ and developments in PhD-research follow and explicate developments in science communication practice. This does not mean that the PhD-research bridges the gap between theory and practice, since systematically testing new insights in practice ismissing.This panel session will start by explaining the phenomenological character of PhD-research in science communication. We will connect this record to other trend studies on science communication research (e.g. bibliographical). We will propose a ‘topographical research activity’ map of science communication that functions as a platform for discussion about scientific developments in science communication. The map is not intended to set a research agenda, but to make it easier for researchers, practitioners and students to reflect on developments and boundary issues.A qualified PhD-researcher and science communication educator who has been studying trends in PhD theses (MvdS), a communication professional who is pursuing PhD research (CA), a PhD supervisor and research leader who is editor-in-chief of a science communication journal (EW), and a science communication researcher who has co-edited an anthology proposing a view of the bestin science communication studies over five decades (BT) will consider the issues arising from these observations and analyses.",
author = "{van der Sanden}, Maarten and Emma Weitkamp and Charlotte Autzen and Brian Trench",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 25-04-2016 Through 28-04-2016",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "26",
language = "English",
url = "http://pcst-2016.org/program/",

}

van der Sanden, M, Weitkamp, E, Autzen, C & Trench, B 2016, 'PhD-Research as a Marker of Science Communication’s Development' Paper presented at, Istanbul, Turkey, 25/04/2016 - 28/04/2016, .

PhD-Research as a Marker of Science Communication’s Development. / van der Sanden, Maarten; Weitkamp, Emma; Autzen, Charlotte; Trench, Brian.

2016. Paper presented at 14th Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference. PCST 2016, Istanbul, Turkey.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - PhD-Research as a Marker of Science Communication’s Development

AU - van der Sanden, Maarten

AU - Weitkamp, Emma

AU - Autzen, Charlotte

AU - Trench, Brian

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2016/4/26

Y1 - 2016/4/26

N2 - PhD-research is important in many scientific domains as it represents early development of new ideas and methods. So what does a 15-year record of science communication PhD-theses (2000-2015, N=164) tell us about the development of ideas and methods in this field? PhD-research, as represented in the projects on which we have gathered information, analyses the real world of science communication from many angles, e.g. scientists, the role of the media, museums, engagement, and generally in a descriptive, sometimes experiential, manner. The dominant form of research explains and understands the reality of science communication through surveys, observations and interviews. This leads us to the idea that PhD-theses tend to be ‘phenomenological’ and developments in PhD-research follow and explicate developments in science communication practice. This does not mean that the PhD-research bridges the gap between theory and practice, since systematically testing new insights in practice ismissing.This panel session will start by explaining the phenomenological character of PhD-research in science communication. We will connect this record to other trend studies on science communication research (e.g. bibliographical). We will propose a ‘topographical research activity’ map of science communication that functions as a platform for discussion about scientific developments in science communication. The map is not intended to set a research agenda, but to make it easier for researchers, practitioners and students to reflect on developments and boundary issues.A qualified PhD-researcher and science communication educator who has been studying trends in PhD theses (MvdS), a communication professional who is pursuing PhD research (CA), a PhD supervisor and research leader who is editor-in-chief of a science communication journal (EW), and a science communication researcher who has co-edited an anthology proposing a view of the bestin science communication studies over five decades (BT) will consider the issues arising from these observations and analyses.

AB - PhD-research is important in many scientific domains as it represents early development of new ideas and methods. So what does a 15-year record of science communication PhD-theses (2000-2015, N=164) tell us about the development of ideas and methods in this field? PhD-research, as represented in the projects on which we have gathered information, analyses the real world of science communication from many angles, e.g. scientists, the role of the media, museums, engagement, and generally in a descriptive, sometimes experiential, manner. The dominant form of research explains and understands the reality of science communication through surveys, observations and interviews. This leads us to the idea that PhD-theses tend to be ‘phenomenological’ and developments in PhD-research follow and explicate developments in science communication practice. This does not mean that the PhD-research bridges the gap between theory and practice, since systematically testing new insights in practice ismissing.This panel session will start by explaining the phenomenological character of PhD-research in science communication. We will connect this record to other trend studies on science communication research (e.g. bibliographical). We will propose a ‘topographical research activity’ map of science communication that functions as a platform for discussion about scientific developments in science communication. The map is not intended to set a research agenda, but to make it easier for researchers, practitioners and students to reflect on developments and boundary issues.A qualified PhD-researcher and science communication educator who has been studying trends in PhD theses (MvdS), a communication professional who is pursuing PhD research (CA), a PhD supervisor and research leader who is editor-in-chief of a science communication journal (EW), and a science communication researcher who has co-edited an anthology proposing a view of the bestin science communication studies over five decades (BT) will consider the issues arising from these observations and analyses.

M3 - Paper

ER -

van der Sanden M, Weitkamp E, Autzen C, Trench B. PhD-Research as a Marker of Science Communication’s Development. 2016. Paper presented at 14th Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference. PCST 2016, Istanbul, Turkey.