Payments for Ecosystem Services

Rife with Problems and Potential. For Transformation Towards Sustainability

Kai M.A Chan, Emily K. Anderson, Mollie Chapman, Kristjan Jespersen, Paige Olmsted

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs are one prominent strategy to address economic externalities of resource extraction and commodity production, improving both social and ecological outcomes. But do PES and related incentive programs achieve that lofty goal? Along with considerable enthusiasm, PES has faced a wide range of substantial critiques. In this paper, we characterize seven major classes of concerns associated with common PES designs, and use these as inspiration to consider potential avenues for improvements in PES outcomes and uptake. The problems include (1) new externalities, (2) misplacement of rights and responsibilities, (3) crowding out existing motivations, (4) efficiency-equity tradeoffs, (5) monitoring costs, (6) limited applicability, and (7) top-down prescription/alienating agency. As currently practiced, many PES programs are thus of limited benefit and even potentially detrimental to sustainability. From this dire conclusion, we highlight several innovations that might be combined and extended in a novel approach to PES that may address all seven problems. Recognizing that PES necessarily articulate and even normalize values, our proposed approach entails designing these institutions intentionally to articulate rights and responsibilities conducive to sustainability—those we might collectively seek to entrench. Problems remain, and new ones may arise, but the proposed approach may offer a way to reimagine PES as a major social and economic tool for enabling sustainable relationships with nature, conserving and restoring ecosystems and their benefits for people now and in the future.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEcological Economics
Volume140
Pages (from-to)110-122
ISSN0921-8009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Payments for ecosystem services
  • Reverse auctions
  • Incentive programs
  • Offsets
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Market-based instruments
  • Motivational crowding out/in
  • Incentives and motivations
  • Stewardship
  • Environmental values
  • Relational values

Cite this

Chan, Kai M.A ; Anderson, Emily K. ; Chapman, Mollie ; Jespersen, Kristjan ; Olmsted, Paige. / Payments for Ecosystem Services : Rife with Problems and Potential. For Transformation Towards Sustainability. In: Ecological Economics. 2017 ; Vol. 140. pp. 110-122.
@article{4eff2bd21eff4d31b30a530fa219b910,
title = "Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife with Problems and Potential. For Transformation Towards Sustainability",
abstract = "Payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs are one prominent strategy to address economic externalities of resource extraction and commodity production, improving both social and ecological outcomes. But do PES and related incentive programs achieve that lofty goal? Along with considerable enthusiasm, PES has faced a wide range of substantial critiques. In this paper, we characterize seven major classes of concerns associated with common PES designs, and use these as inspiration to consider potential avenues for improvements in PES outcomes and uptake. The problems include (1) new externalities, (2) misplacement of rights and responsibilities, (3) crowding out existing motivations, (4) efficiency-equity tradeoffs, (5) monitoring costs, (6) limited applicability, and (7) top-down prescription/alienating agency. As currently practiced, many PES programs are thus of limited benefit and even potentially detrimental to sustainability. From this dire conclusion, we highlight several innovations that might be combined and extended in a novel approach to PES that may address all seven problems. Recognizing that PES necessarily articulate and even normalize values, our proposed approach entails designing these institutions intentionally to articulate rights and responsibilities conducive to sustainability—those we might collectively seek to entrench. Problems remain, and new ones may arise, but the proposed approach may offer a way to reimagine PES as a major social and economic tool for enabling sustainable relationships with nature, conserving and restoring ecosystems and their benefits for people now and in the future.",
keywords = "Payments for ecosystem services, Reverse auctions, Incentive programs, Offsets, Corporate social responsibility, Market-based instruments, Motivational crowding out/in, Incentives and motivations, Stewardship, Environmental values, Relational values, Payments for ecosystem services, Reverse auctions, Incentive programs, Offsets, Corporate social responsibility, Market-based instruments, Motivational crowding out/in, Incentives and motivations, Stewardship, Environmental values, Relational values",
author = "Chan, {Kai M.A} and Anderson, {Emily K.} and Mollie Chapman and Kristjan Jespersen and Paige Olmsted",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.029",
language = "English",
volume = "140",
pages = "110--122",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Payments for Ecosystem Services : Rife with Problems and Potential. For Transformation Towards Sustainability. / Chan, Kai M.A; Anderson, Emily K.; Chapman, Mollie; Jespersen, Kristjan; Olmsted, Paige.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 140, 2017, p. 110-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Payments for Ecosystem Services

T2 - Rife with Problems and Potential. For Transformation Towards Sustainability

AU - Chan, Kai M.A

AU - Anderson, Emily K.

AU - Chapman, Mollie

AU - Jespersen, Kristjan

AU - Olmsted, Paige

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs are one prominent strategy to address economic externalities of resource extraction and commodity production, improving both social and ecological outcomes. But do PES and related incentive programs achieve that lofty goal? Along with considerable enthusiasm, PES has faced a wide range of substantial critiques. In this paper, we characterize seven major classes of concerns associated with common PES designs, and use these as inspiration to consider potential avenues for improvements in PES outcomes and uptake. The problems include (1) new externalities, (2) misplacement of rights and responsibilities, (3) crowding out existing motivations, (4) efficiency-equity tradeoffs, (5) monitoring costs, (6) limited applicability, and (7) top-down prescription/alienating agency. As currently practiced, many PES programs are thus of limited benefit and even potentially detrimental to sustainability. From this dire conclusion, we highlight several innovations that might be combined and extended in a novel approach to PES that may address all seven problems. Recognizing that PES necessarily articulate and even normalize values, our proposed approach entails designing these institutions intentionally to articulate rights and responsibilities conducive to sustainability—those we might collectively seek to entrench. Problems remain, and new ones may arise, but the proposed approach may offer a way to reimagine PES as a major social and economic tool for enabling sustainable relationships with nature, conserving and restoring ecosystems and their benefits for people now and in the future.

AB - Payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs are one prominent strategy to address economic externalities of resource extraction and commodity production, improving both social and ecological outcomes. But do PES and related incentive programs achieve that lofty goal? Along with considerable enthusiasm, PES has faced a wide range of substantial critiques. In this paper, we characterize seven major classes of concerns associated with common PES designs, and use these as inspiration to consider potential avenues for improvements in PES outcomes and uptake. The problems include (1) new externalities, (2) misplacement of rights and responsibilities, (3) crowding out existing motivations, (4) efficiency-equity tradeoffs, (5) monitoring costs, (6) limited applicability, and (7) top-down prescription/alienating agency. As currently practiced, many PES programs are thus of limited benefit and even potentially detrimental to sustainability. From this dire conclusion, we highlight several innovations that might be combined and extended in a novel approach to PES that may address all seven problems. Recognizing that PES necessarily articulate and even normalize values, our proposed approach entails designing these institutions intentionally to articulate rights and responsibilities conducive to sustainability—those we might collectively seek to entrench. Problems remain, and new ones may arise, but the proposed approach may offer a way to reimagine PES as a major social and economic tool for enabling sustainable relationships with nature, conserving and restoring ecosystems and their benefits for people now and in the future.

KW - Payments for ecosystem services

KW - Reverse auctions

KW - Incentive programs

KW - Offsets

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Market-based instruments

KW - Motivational crowding out/in

KW - Incentives and motivations

KW - Stewardship

KW - Environmental values

KW - Relational values

KW - Payments for ecosystem services

KW - Reverse auctions

KW - Incentive programs

KW - Offsets

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Market-based instruments

KW - Motivational crowding out/in

KW - Incentives and motivations

KW - Stewardship

KW - Environmental values

KW - Relational values

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925565687

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.029

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.029

M3 - Journal article

VL - 140

SP - 110

EP - 122

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -