Partisanship, Expertise, or Connections? A Conjoint Survey Experiment on Lobbyist Hiring Decisions

David R. Miller, Joshua McCrain*, Hans J. G. Hassell, Benjamin C. K. Egerod

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Lobbyists are important agents of organized interests. While prior studies have investigated the observed hiring patterns of interest groups, conclusions about the demand for lobbyist characteristics may be confounded by the availability of lobbyists with certain characteristics. To assess the demand for lobbyists with expertise, connections, and who share groups’ preferences, we use a conjoint survey experiment to examine the hiring preferences for lobbyists. We find that organized interests prefer lobbyists with policy-specific expertise and the necessary connections to get access to decision-makers, but find little evidence that connections are more valuable than expertise. We also find that organized interests prefer lobbyists who share their political ideology, but that this preference diminishes when the hiring organization is not aligned ideologically with the party in unified control of government. Overall, our study paints a more nuanced picture of the role of preferences and connections in lobbying than many would expect.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberewae013
JournalJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization
Number of pages21
ISSN8756-6222
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 30 August 2024.

Cite this