Parents' Evaluation of the IDEFICS Intervention

An Analysis Focussing on Socio-economic Factors, Child's Weight Status and Intervention Exposure

Stuart G. Nicholls, Hermann Pohlabeln, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Charalambos Chadjigeorgiou, Wencke Gwozdz, Antje Hebestreit, Fabio Lauria, Lauren Lissner, Dénes Molnar, Alba María Santaliestra-Pasías, Toomas Veidebaum, Garrath Williams

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Introduction: From April 2008 to August 2010 the Identification and prevention of Dietary- and lifestyle-induced health EFfects In Children and infantS (IDEFICS) intervention aimed to encourage healthier diets, higher physical activity levels and lower stress levels among European children and their families. While the intervention was intended to improve children's health, we also wished to assess whether there were unwelcome aspects or negative side-effects. Therefore all parents of children who participated in the IDEFICS intervention were asked for their views on different aspects of the intervention.
    Methods: A total of 10,016 parents of children who participated in the IDEFICS survey and who were involved in the intervention were invited to complete a questionnaire on positive and negative impacts of the intervention. Responses to each of the statements were coded on a four point Likert-type scale. Demographic data were collected as part of the baseline (T0 ) and first follow-up (T1 ) surveys; intervention exposure data was also collected in the T1 follow-up survey. Anthropometric data was collected in the same surveys, and child's weight status was assessed according to Cole and Lobstein. After initial review of the univariate statistics multilevel logistic regression was conducted to analyse the influence of socio-economic factors, child's weight status and intervention exposure on parental responses.
    Results: In total 4,997 responses were received. Approval rates were high, and few parents reported negative effects. Parents who reported higher levels of exposure to the intervention were more likely to approve of it and were also no more likely to notice negative aspects. Less-educated and lower income parents were more likely to report that the intervention would make a lasting positive difference, but also more likely to report that the intervention had had negative effects. Parents of overweight and obese children were more likely to report negative effects - above all, that 'the intervention had made their child feel as if he/she was "fat" or "overweight."
    Conclusion: While the results represent a broad endorsement of the IDEFICS intervention, they also suggest the importance of vigilance concerning the psychological effects of obesity interventions on overweight and obese children.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalObesity Reviews
    Volume16
    Issue numberSuppl 2
    Pages (from-to)103-118
    Number of pages16
    ISSN1467-7881
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • Children
    • Intervention
    • Obesity
    • Parent's view

    Cite this

    Nicholls, S. G., Pohlabeln, H., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Chadjigeorgiou, C., Gwozdz, W., Hebestreit, A., ... Williams, G. (2015). Parents' Evaluation of the IDEFICS Intervention: An Analysis Focussing on Socio-economic Factors, Child's Weight Status and Intervention Exposure. Obesity Reviews, 16(Suppl 2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12332
    Nicholls, Stuart G. ; Pohlabeln, Hermann ; De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse ; Chadjigeorgiou, Charalambos ; Gwozdz, Wencke ; Hebestreit, Antje ; Lauria, Fabio ; Lissner, Lauren ; Molnar, Dénes ; Santaliestra-Pasías, Alba María ; Veidebaum, Toomas ; Williams, Garrath. / Parents' Evaluation of the IDEFICS Intervention : An Analysis Focussing on Socio-economic Factors, Child's Weight Status and Intervention Exposure. In: Obesity Reviews. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. Suppl 2. pp. 103-118.
    @article{5c6105e46c6e42b2bdfd1dfc532d3bce,
    title = "Parents' Evaluation of the IDEFICS Intervention: An Analysis Focussing on Socio-economic Factors, Child's Weight Status and Intervention Exposure",
    abstract = "Introduction: From April 2008 to August 2010 the Identification and prevention of Dietary- and lifestyle-induced health EFfects In Children and infantS (IDEFICS) intervention aimed to encourage healthier diets, higher physical activity levels and lower stress levels among European children and their families. While the intervention was intended to improve children's health, we also wished to assess whether there were unwelcome aspects or negative side-effects. Therefore all parents of children who participated in the IDEFICS intervention were asked for their views on different aspects of the intervention.Methods: A total of 10,016 parents of children who participated in the IDEFICS survey and who were involved in the intervention were invited to complete a questionnaire on positive and negative impacts of the intervention. Responses to each of the statements were coded on a four point Likert-type scale. Demographic data were collected as part of the baseline (T0 ) and first follow-up (T1 ) surveys; intervention exposure data was also collected in the T1 follow-up survey. Anthropometric data was collected in the same surveys, and child's weight status was assessed according to Cole and Lobstein. After initial review of the univariate statistics multilevel logistic regression was conducted to analyse the influence of socio-economic factors, child's weight status and intervention exposure on parental responses.Results: In total 4,997 responses were received. Approval rates were high, and few parents reported negative effects. Parents who reported higher levels of exposure to the intervention were more likely to approve of it and were also no more likely to notice negative aspects. Less-educated and lower income parents were more likely to report that the intervention would make a lasting positive difference, but also more likely to report that the intervention had had negative effects. Parents of overweight and obese children were more likely to report negative effects - above all, that 'the intervention had made their child feel as if he/she was {"}fat{"} or {"}overweight.{"}Conclusion: While the results represent a broad endorsement of the IDEFICS intervention, they also suggest the importance of vigilance concerning the psychological effects of obesity interventions on overweight and obese children.",
    keywords = "Children, Intervention, Obesity, Parent's views, Children, Intervention, Obesity, Parent's view",
    author = "Nicholls, {Stuart G.} and Hermann Pohlabeln and {De Bourdeaudhuij}, Ilse and Charalambos Chadjigeorgiou and Wencke Gwozdz and Antje Hebestreit and Fabio Lauria and Lauren Lissner and D{\'e}nes Molnar and Santaliestra-Pas{\'i}as, {Alba Mar{\'i}a} and Toomas Veidebaum and Garrath Williams",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1111/obr.12332",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "103--118",
    journal = "Obesity Reviews",
    issn = "1467-7881",
    publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
    number = "Suppl 2",

    }

    Nicholls, SG, Pohlabeln, H, De Bourdeaudhuij, I, Chadjigeorgiou, C, Gwozdz, W, Hebestreit, A, Lauria, F, Lissner, L, Molnar, D, Santaliestra-Pasías, AM, Veidebaum, T & Williams, G 2015, 'Parents' Evaluation of the IDEFICS Intervention: An Analysis Focussing on Socio-economic Factors, Child's Weight Status and Intervention Exposure', Obesity Reviews, vol. 16, no. Suppl 2, pp. 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12332

    Parents' Evaluation of the IDEFICS Intervention : An Analysis Focussing on Socio-economic Factors, Child's Weight Status and Intervention Exposure. / Nicholls, Stuart G.; Pohlabeln, Hermann; De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse; Chadjigeorgiou, Charalambos; Gwozdz, Wencke; Hebestreit, Antje; Lauria, Fabio; Lissner, Lauren; Molnar, Dénes; Santaliestra-Pasías, Alba María; Veidebaum, Toomas; Williams, Garrath.

    In: Obesity Reviews, Vol. 16, No. Suppl 2, 2015, p. 103-118.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Parents' Evaluation of the IDEFICS Intervention

    T2 - An Analysis Focussing on Socio-economic Factors, Child's Weight Status and Intervention Exposure

    AU - Nicholls, Stuart G.

    AU - Pohlabeln, Hermann

    AU - De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse

    AU - Chadjigeorgiou, Charalambos

    AU - Gwozdz, Wencke

    AU - Hebestreit, Antje

    AU - Lauria, Fabio

    AU - Lissner, Lauren

    AU - Molnar, Dénes

    AU - Santaliestra-Pasías, Alba María

    AU - Veidebaum, Toomas

    AU - Williams, Garrath

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Introduction: From April 2008 to August 2010 the Identification and prevention of Dietary- and lifestyle-induced health EFfects In Children and infantS (IDEFICS) intervention aimed to encourage healthier diets, higher physical activity levels and lower stress levels among European children and their families. While the intervention was intended to improve children's health, we also wished to assess whether there were unwelcome aspects or negative side-effects. Therefore all parents of children who participated in the IDEFICS intervention were asked for their views on different aspects of the intervention.Methods: A total of 10,016 parents of children who participated in the IDEFICS survey and who were involved in the intervention were invited to complete a questionnaire on positive and negative impacts of the intervention. Responses to each of the statements were coded on a four point Likert-type scale. Demographic data were collected as part of the baseline (T0 ) and first follow-up (T1 ) surveys; intervention exposure data was also collected in the T1 follow-up survey. Anthropometric data was collected in the same surveys, and child's weight status was assessed according to Cole and Lobstein. After initial review of the univariate statistics multilevel logistic regression was conducted to analyse the influence of socio-economic factors, child's weight status and intervention exposure on parental responses.Results: In total 4,997 responses were received. Approval rates were high, and few parents reported negative effects. Parents who reported higher levels of exposure to the intervention were more likely to approve of it and were also no more likely to notice negative aspects. Less-educated and lower income parents were more likely to report that the intervention would make a lasting positive difference, but also more likely to report that the intervention had had negative effects. Parents of overweight and obese children were more likely to report negative effects - above all, that 'the intervention had made their child feel as if he/she was "fat" or "overweight."Conclusion: While the results represent a broad endorsement of the IDEFICS intervention, they also suggest the importance of vigilance concerning the psychological effects of obesity interventions on overweight and obese children.

    AB - Introduction: From April 2008 to August 2010 the Identification and prevention of Dietary- and lifestyle-induced health EFfects In Children and infantS (IDEFICS) intervention aimed to encourage healthier diets, higher physical activity levels and lower stress levels among European children and their families. While the intervention was intended to improve children's health, we also wished to assess whether there were unwelcome aspects or negative side-effects. Therefore all parents of children who participated in the IDEFICS intervention were asked for their views on different aspects of the intervention.Methods: A total of 10,016 parents of children who participated in the IDEFICS survey and who were involved in the intervention were invited to complete a questionnaire on positive and negative impacts of the intervention. Responses to each of the statements were coded on a four point Likert-type scale. Demographic data were collected as part of the baseline (T0 ) and first follow-up (T1 ) surveys; intervention exposure data was also collected in the T1 follow-up survey. Anthropometric data was collected in the same surveys, and child's weight status was assessed according to Cole and Lobstein. After initial review of the univariate statistics multilevel logistic regression was conducted to analyse the influence of socio-economic factors, child's weight status and intervention exposure on parental responses.Results: In total 4,997 responses were received. Approval rates were high, and few parents reported negative effects. Parents who reported higher levels of exposure to the intervention were more likely to approve of it and were also no more likely to notice negative aspects. Less-educated and lower income parents were more likely to report that the intervention would make a lasting positive difference, but also more likely to report that the intervention had had negative effects. Parents of overweight and obese children were more likely to report negative effects - above all, that 'the intervention had made their child feel as if he/she was "fat" or "overweight."Conclusion: While the results represent a broad endorsement of the IDEFICS intervention, they also suggest the importance of vigilance concerning the psychological effects of obesity interventions on overweight and obese children.

    KW - Children

    KW - Intervention

    KW - Obesity

    KW - Parent's views

    KW - Children

    KW - Intervention

    KW - Obesity

    KW - Parent's view

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017847308&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1111/obr.12332

    DO - 10.1111/obr.12332

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 16

    SP - 103

    EP - 118

    JO - Obesity Reviews

    JF - Obesity Reviews

    SN - 1467-7881

    IS - Suppl 2

    ER -