Othering, Ableism and Disability

A Discursive Analysis of Co-Workers’ Construction of Colleagues with Visible Impairments

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

769 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explore how able-bodied co-workers engage in the ‘othering’ of colleagues with impairments. Taking a discursive analytical approach, the article examines interviews with 19 managers and 43 colleagues who all worked closely with an employee with cerebral palsy in 13 different work organizations. The primary finding of the article is that co-workers spontaneously refer to other ‘different’ people (e.g. transvestites, homosexuals, immigrants) when talking about a colleague with visible impairments. This finding suggests that disability is simultaneously a discursive category (i.e. the discourse of ableism prevents co-workers from talking about the impairments of a colleague) and a material phenomenon (i.e. employees with impairments are a distinct category of employees in the eyes of the co-workers). Othering of employees with disabilities thus demonstrates contradictory discourses of ableism (which automatically produce difference) and tolerance and inclusiveness (which automatically render it problematic to talk about difference
Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Relations
Volume68
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1341-1363
ISSN0018-7267
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Published 04 February 2016

Keywords

  • Ableism
  • Colleagues
  • Co-Workers
  • Difference
  • Disability
  • Discourse Analysis
  • Employees
  • Managers
  • Othering
  • Work Organizations

Cite this

@article{bb6fc225c711487b824cb2ebb22792b2,
title = "Othering, Ableism and Disability: A Discursive Analysis of Co-Workers’ Construction of Colleagues with Visible Impairments",
abstract = "The aim of this article is to explore how able-bodied co-workers engage in the ‘othering’ of colleagues with impairments. Taking a discursive analytical approach, the article examines interviews with 19 managers and 43 colleagues who all worked closely with an employee with cerebral palsy in 13 different work organizations. The primary finding of the article is that co-workers spontaneously refer to other ‘different’ people (e.g. transvestites, homosexuals, immigrants) when talking about a colleague with visible impairments. This finding suggests that disability is simultaneously a discursive category (i.e. the discourse of ableism prevents co-workers from talking about the impairments of a colleague) and a material phenomenon (i.e. employees with impairments are a distinct category of employees in the eyes of the co-workers). Othering of employees with disabilities thus demonstrates contradictory discourses of ableism (which automatically produce difference) and tolerance and inclusiveness (which automatically render it problematic to talk about difference",
keywords = "Ableism, Colleagues, Co-Workers, Difference, Disability, Discourse Analysis, Employees, Managers, Othering, Work Organizations, Ableism, Colleagues, Co-Workers, Difference, Disability, Discourse Analysis, Employees, Managers, Othering, Work Organizations",
author = "Nanna Mik-Meyer",
note = "Published 04 February 2016",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/0018726715618454",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "1341--1363",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

Othering, Ableism and Disability : A Discursive Analysis of Co-Workers’ Construction of Colleagues with Visible Impairments. / Mik-Meyer, Nanna.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 68, No. 6, 2016, p. 1341-1363.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Othering, Ableism and Disability

T2 - A Discursive Analysis of Co-Workers’ Construction of Colleagues with Visible Impairments

AU - Mik-Meyer, Nanna

N1 - Published 04 February 2016

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The aim of this article is to explore how able-bodied co-workers engage in the ‘othering’ of colleagues with impairments. Taking a discursive analytical approach, the article examines interviews with 19 managers and 43 colleagues who all worked closely with an employee with cerebral palsy in 13 different work organizations. The primary finding of the article is that co-workers spontaneously refer to other ‘different’ people (e.g. transvestites, homosexuals, immigrants) when talking about a colleague with visible impairments. This finding suggests that disability is simultaneously a discursive category (i.e. the discourse of ableism prevents co-workers from talking about the impairments of a colleague) and a material phenomenon (i.e. employees with impairments are a distinct category of employees in the eyes of the co-workers). Othering of employees with disabilities thus demonstrates contradictory discourses of ableism (which automatically produce difference) and tolerance and inclusiveness (which automatically render it problematic to talk about difference

AB - The aim of this article is to explore how able-bodied co-workers engage in the ‘othering’ of colleagues with impairments. Taking a discursive analytical approach, the article examines interviews with 19 managers and 43 colleagues who all worked closely with an employee with cerebral palsy in 13 different work organizations. The primary finding of the article is that co-workers spontaneously refer to other ‘different’ people (e.g. transvestites, homosexuals, immigrants) when talking about a colleague with visible impairments. This finding suggests that disability is simultaneously a discursive category (i.e. the discourse of ableism prevents co-workers from talking about the impairments of a colleague) and a material phenomenon (i.e. employees with impairments are a distinct category of employees in the eyes of the co-workers). Othering of employees with disabilities thus demonstrates contradictory discourses of ableism (which automatically produce difference) and tolerance and inclusiveness (which automatically render it problematic to talk about difference

KW - Ableism

KW - Colleagues

KW - Co-Workers

KW - Difference

KW - Disability

KW - Discourse Analysis

KW - Employees

KW - Managers

KW - Othering

KW - Work Organizations

KW - Ableism

KW - Colleagues

KW - Co-Workers

KW - Difference

KW - Disability

KW - Discourse Analysis

KW - Employees

KW - Managers

KW - Othering

KW - Work Organizations

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921344196&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1177/0018726715618454

DO - 10.1177/0018726715618454

M3 - Journal article

VL - 68

SP - 1341

EP - 1363

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 6

ER -