Organizing Space and Time through Relational Human–animal Boundary Work: Exclusion, Invitation and Disturbance

Daniel Sage, Lise Justesen, Andrew Dainty, Kjell Tryggestad, Jan Mouritsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

191 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, we examine the role that animals play within human organizational boundary work. In so doing, we challenge the latent anthropocentricism in many, if not most, theories of organization that locate animal agencies outside the boundary work that is said to constitute organizing. In developing this argument, we draw together diverse strands of work mobilizing Actor–Network Theory that engage the entanglement of human/nonhuman agencies. In bringing this work together, we suggest humans may organize, even manage, by conducting relational boundary work with animal agencies, spacings and timings. Our argument is empirically illustrated and theoretically developed across two cases of the spacings and timings of construction project organizations—an infrastructure project in the United Kingdom and a housing development in Scandinavia. Construction projects are well-known for their tightly managed linear timings and for producing the built spaces that separate humans and animals. Three concepts—Invitation, Exclusion and Disturbance—are offered to help apprehend how such organizings of space and time are themselves dependent upon entanglements between human and animal agencies. We conclude by suggesting that animals should not be negatively constituted as an ‘Other’ to human organizing, or indeed management, but rather acknowledged as sometimes constituting human capacities to organize, even managerially control, space and time.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOrganization
Volume23
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)434-450
ISSN1350-5084
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Actor–network theories
  • Animal geographies
  • Construction
  • Organizational boundaries
  • Organizational spaces and times

Cite this

@article{f9befc1030484cb2924660ad34a9f09b,
title = "Organizing Space and Time through Relational Human–animal Boundary Work: Exclusion, Invitation and Disturbance",
abstract = "In this article, we examine the role that animals play within human organizational boundary work. In so doing, we challenge the latent anthropocentricism in many, if not most, theories of organization that locate animal agencies outside the boundary work that is said to constitute organizing. In developing this argument, we draw together diverse strands of work mobilizing Actor–Network Theory that engage the entanglement of human/nonhuman agencies. In bringing this work together, we suggest humans may organize, even manage, by conducting relational boundary work with animal agencies, spacings and timings. Our argument is empirically illustrated and theoretically developed across two cases of the spacings and timings of construction project organizations—an infrastructure project in the United Kingdom and a housing development in Scandinavia. Construction projects are well-known for their tightly managed linear timings and for producing the built spaces that separate humans and animals. Three concepts—Invitation, Exclusion and Disturbance—are offered to help apprehend how such organizings of space and time are themselves dependent upon entanglements between human and animal agencies. We conclude by suggesting that animals should not be negatively constituted as an ‘Other’ to human organizing, or indeed management, but rather acknowledged as sometimes constituting human capacities to organize, even managerially control, space and time.",
keywords = "Actor–network theories, Animal geographies, Construction, Organizational boundaries, Organizational spaces and times, Actor–network theories, Animal geographies, Construction, Organizational boundaries, Organizational spaces and times",
author = "Daniel Sage and Lise Justesen and Andrew Dainty and Kjell Tryggestad and Jan Mouritsen",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/1350508416629449",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "434--450",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Organizing Space and Time through Relational Human–animal Boundary Work : Exclusion, Invitation and Disturbance. / Sage, Daniel; Justesen, Lise; Dainty, Andrew; Tryggestad, Kjell; Mouritsen, Jan.

In: Organization, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2016, p. 434-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizing Space and Time through Relational Human–animal Boundary Work

T2 - Exclusion, Invitation and Disturbance

AU - Sage, Daniel

AU - Justesen, Lise

AU - Dainty, Andrew

AU - Tryggestad, Kjell

AU - Mouritsen, Jan

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In this article, we examine the role that animals play within human organizational boundary work. In so doing, we challenge the latent anthropocentricism in many, if not most, theories of organization that locate animal agencies outside the boundary work that is said to constitute organizing. In developing this argument, we draw together diverse strands of work mobilizing Actor–Network Theory that engage the entanglement of human/nonhuman agencies. In bringing this work together, we suggest humans may organize, even manage, by conducting relational boundary work with animal agencies, spacings and timings. Our argument is empirically illustrated and theoretically developed across two cases of the spacings and timings of construction project organizations—an infrastructure project in the United Kingdom and a housing development in Scandinavia. Construction projects are well-known for their tightly managed linear timings and for producing the built spaces that separate humans and animals. Three concepts—Invitation, Exclusion and Disturbance—are offered to help apprehend how such organizings of space and time are themselves dependent upon entanglements between human and animal agencies. We conclude by suggesting that animals should not be negatively constituted as an ‘Other’ to human organizing, or indeed management, but rather acknowledged as sometimes constituting human capacities to organize, even managerially control, space and time.

AB - In this article, we examine the role that animals play within human organizational boundary work. In so doing, we challenge the latent anthropocentricism in many, if not most, theories of organization that locate animal agencies outside the boundary work that is said to constitute organizing. In developing this argument, we draw together diverse strands of work mobilizing Actor–Network Theory that engage the entanglement of human/nonhuman agencies. In bringing this work together, we suggest humans may organize, even manage, by conducting relational boundary work with animal agencies, spacings and timings. Our argument is empirically illustrated and theoretically developed across two cases of the spacings and timings of construction project organizations—an infrastructure project in the United Kingdom and a housing development in Scandinavia. Construction projects are well-known for their tightly managed linear timings and for producing the built spaces that separate humans and animals. Three concepts—Invitation, Exclusion and Disturbance—are offered to help apprehend how such organizings of space and time are themselves dependent upon entanglements between human and animal agencies. We conclude by suggesting that animals should not be negatively constituted as an ‘Other’ to human organizing, or indeed management, but rather acknowledged as sometimes constituting human capacities to organize, even managerially control, space and time.

KW - Actor–network theories

KW - Animal geographies

KW - Construction

KW - Organizational boundaries

KW - Organizational spaces and times

KW - Actor–network theories

KW - Animal geographies

KW - Construction

KW - Organizational boundaries

KW - Organizational spaces and times

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925616074

U2 - 10.1177/1350508416629449

DO - 10.1177/1350508416629449

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 434

EP - 450

JO - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

IS - 3

ER -