Organizational Transparency: Conceptualizations, Conditions, and Consequences

Oana Brindusa Albu, Mikkel Flyverbom

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Transparency is an increasingly prominent area of research that offers valuable insights for organizational studies. However, conceptualizations of transparency are rarely subject to critical scrutiny and thus their relevance remains unclear. In most accounts, transparency is associated with the sharing of information and the perceived quality of the information shared. This narrow focus on information and quality, however, overlooks the dynamics of organizational transparency. To provide a more structured conceptualization of organizational transparency, this article unpacks the assumptions that shape the extant literature, with a focus on three dimensions: conceptualizations, conditions, and consequences. The contribution of the study is twofold: (a) On a conceptual level, we provide a framework that articulates two paradigmatic positions underpinning discussions of transparency, verifiability approaches and performativity approaches; (b) on an analytical level, we suggest a novel future research agenda for studying organizational transparency that pays attention to its dynamics, paradoxes, and performative characteristics.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalBusiness & Society
    Volume58
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)268-297
    Number of pages30
    ISSN0007-6503
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

    Bibliographical note

    Published online: July 13, 2016

    Keywords

    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate transparency
    • Organizational theory
    • Performativity
    • Theory building

    Cite this

    @article{8cc4064e8405445a91a225fa1feeba9e,
    title = "Organizational Transparency: Conceptualizations, Conditions, and Consequences",
    abstract = "Transparency is an increasingly prominent area of research that offers valuable insights for organizational studies. However, conceptualizations of transparency are rarely subject to critical scrutiny and thus their relevance remains unclear. In most accounts, transparency is associated with the sharing of information and the perceived quality of the information shared. This narrow focus on information and quality, however, overlooks the dynamics of organizational transparency. To provide a more structured conceptualization of organizational transparency, this article unpacks the assumptions that shape the extant literature, with a focus on three dimensions: conceptualizations, conditions, and consequences. The contribution of the study is twofold: (a) On a conceptual level, we provide a framework that articulates two paradigmatic positions underpinning discussions of transparency, verifiability approaches and performativity approaches; (b) on an analytical level, we suggest a novel future research agenda for studying organizational transparency that pays attention to its dynamics, paradoxes, and performative characteristics.",
    keywords = "Corporate governance, Corporate transparency, Organizational theory, Performativity, Theory building, Corporate Governance, Corporate transparency, Organizational theory, Performativity, Theory building",
    author = "Albu, {Oana Brindusa} and Mikkel Flyverbom",
    note = "Published online: July 13, 2016",
    year = "2019",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1177/0007650316659851",
    language = "English",
    volume = "58",
    pages = "268--297",
    journal = "Business & Society",
    issn = "0007-6503",
    publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
    number = "2",

    }

    Organizational Transparency : Conceptualizations, Conditions, and Consequences. / Albu, Oana Brindusa; Flyverbom, Mikkel.

    In: Business & Society, Vol. 58, No. 2, 02.2019, p. 268-297.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Organizational Transparency

    T2 - Conceptualizations, Conditions, and Consequences

    AU - Albu, Oana Brindusa

    AU - Flyverbom, Mikkel

    N1 - Published online: July 13, 2016

    PY - 2019/2

    Y1 - 2019/2

    N2 - Transparency is an increasingly prominent area of research that offers valuable insights for organizational studies. However, conceptualizations of transparency are rarely subject to critical scrutiny and thus their relevance remains unclear. In most accounts, transparency is associated with the sharing of information and the perceived quality of the information shared. This narrow focus on information and quality, however, overlooks the dynamics of organizational transparency. To provide a more structured conceptualization of organizational transparency, this article unpacks the assumptions that shape the extant literature, with a focus on three dimensions: conceptualizations, conditions, and consequences. The contribution of the study is twofold: (a) On a conceptual level, we provide a framework that articulates two paradigmatic positions underpinning discussions of transparency, verifiability approaches and performativity approaches; (b) on an analytical level, we suggest a novel future research agenda for studying organizational transparency that pays attention to its dynamics, paradoxes, and performative characteristics.

    AB - Transparency is an increasingly prominent area of research that offers valuable insights for organizational studies. However, conceptualizations of transparency are rarely subject to critical scrutiny and thus their relevance remains unclear. In most accounts, transparency is associated with the sharing of information and the perceived quality of the information shared. This narrow focus on information and quality, however, overlooks the dynamics of organizational transparency. To provide a more structured conceptualization of organizational transparency, this article unpacks the assumptions that shape the extant literature, with a focus on three dimensions: conceptualizations, conditions, and consequences. The contribution of the study is twofold: (a) On a conceptual level, we provide a framework that articulates two paradigmatic positions underpinning discussions of transparency, verifiability approaches and performativity approaches; (b) on an analytical level, we suggest a novel future research agenda for studying organizational transparency that pays attention to its dynamics, paradoxes, and performative characteristics.

    KW - Corporate governance

    KW - Corporate transparency

    KW - Organizational theory

    KW - Performativity

    KW - Theory building

    KW - Corporate Governance

    KW - Corporate transparency

    KW - Organizational theory

    KW - Performativity

    KW - Theory building

    UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921337077&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1177/0007650316659851

    DO - 10.1177/0007650316659851

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 58

    SP - 268

    EP - 297

    JO - Business & Society

    JF - Business & Society

    SN - 0007-6503

    IS - 2

    ER -