Organizational Transparency as Myth and Metaphor

Lars Thøger Christensen, Joep Cornelissen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Transparency has achieved a mythical status in society. Myths are not false accounts or understandings, but deep-seated and definitive descriptions of the world that ontologically ground the ways in which we frame and see the world around us. We explore the mythical nature of transparency from this perspective, explain its social-historical underpinnings and discuss its influence on contemporary organizations. In doing so, we also theorize in a more general sense about the relationship between myth, as a foundational understanding and description of the world, and the constellation of metaphors, as specific ways of framing and seeing organizational reality, to which it gives rise. While observations and evidence can always be adduced to challenge a particular set of metaphors, the endogenous force of the myth may sustain the overall project. This process is explained with a detailed analysis of the transparency myth.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEuropean Journal of Social Theory
    Volume18
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)132-149
    Number of pages18
    ISSN1368-4310
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • Metaphor
    • Modernity
    • Myth
    • Transparency

    Cite this

    @article{360d6cf50f414710a40de6a5e5b9f206,
    title = "Organizational Transparency as Myth and Metaphor",
    abstract = "Transparency has achieved a mythical status in society. Myths are not false accounts or understandings, but deep-seated and definitive descriptions of the world that ontologically ground the ways in which we frame and see the world around us. We explore the mythical nature of transparency from this perspective, explain its social-historical underpinnings and discuss its influence on contemporary organizations. In doing so, we also theorize in a more general sense about the relationship between myth, as a foundational understanding and description of the world, and the constellation of metaphors, as specific ways of framing and seeing organizational reality, to which it gives rise. While observations and evidence can always be adduced to challenge a particular set of metaphors, the endogenous force of the myth may sustain the overall project. This process is explained with a detailed analysis of the transparency myth.",
    keywords = "Metaphor, Modernity, Myth, Transparency, Metaphor, Modernity, Myth, Transparency",
    author = "Christensen, {Lars Th{\o}ger} and Joep Cornelissen",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1177/1368431014555256",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "132--149",
    journal = "European Journal of Social Theory",
    issn = "1368-4310",
    publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
    number = "2",

    }

    Organizational Transparency as Myth and Metaphor. / Christensen, Lars Thøger; Cornelissen, Joep.

    In: European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2015, p. 132-149.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Organizational Transparency as Myth and Metaphor

    AU - Christensen, Lars Thøger

    AU - Cornelissen, Joep

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Transparency has achieved a mythical status in society. Myths are not false accounts or understandings, but deep-seated and definitive descriptions of the world that ontologically ground the ways in which we frame and see the world around us. We explore the mythical nature of transparency from this perspective, explain its social-historical underpinnings and discuss its influence on contemporary organizations. In doing so, we also theorize in a more general sense about the relationship between myth, as a foundational understanding and description of the world, and the constellation of metaphors, as specific ways of framing and seeing organizational reality, to which it gives rise. While observations and evidence can always be adduced to challenge a particular set of metaphors, the endogenous force of the myth may sustain the overall project. This process is explained with a detailed analysis of the transparency myth.

    AB - Transparency has achieved a mythical status in society. Myths are not false accounts or understandings, but deep-seated and definitive descriptions of the world that ontologically ground the ways in which we frame and see the world around us. We explore the mythical nature of transparency from this perspective, explain its social-historical underpinnings and discuss its influence on contemporary organizations. In doing so, we also theorize in a more general sense about the relationship between myth, as a foundational understanding and description of the world, and the constellation of metaphors, as specific ways of framing and seeing organizational reality, to which it gives rise. While observations and evidence can always be adduced to challenge a particular set of metaphors, the endogenous force of the myth may sustain the overall project. This process is explained with a detailed analysis of the transparency myth.

    KW - Metaphor

    KW - Modernity

    KW - Myth

    KW - Transparency

    KW - Metaphor

    KW - Modernity

    KW - Myth

    KW - Transparency

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017792228&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1177/1368431014555256

    DO - 10.1177/1368431014555256

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 18

    SP - 132

    EP - 149

    JO - European Journal of Social Theory

    JF - European Journal of Social Theory

    SN - 1368-4310

    IS - 2

    ER -