Organizational Professionalism: Social Workers Negotiating Tools of NPM

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

76 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines how social workers and managers perceive mean-ingful work and expertise in six care and treatment facilities in Denmark. Based on 29 interviews with social workers (n=22) and managers (n=7), the article shows how New Public Management-inspired tools such as scoring schemas align with social work values such as “client-centeredness” and working with the individual welfare recipient face-to-face. The article finds that fitting social work into organizational schemas changes the work practices of social workers and also the way members of this profession define meaningful work and expertise. In addition, the article also finds that scoring schemas cause conflicts among social workers regarding the char-acter of expertise when values of social work (to meet a welfare recipient’s need) must be aligned with NPM-inspired values of organizations (to meet managers’ de-mand for documentation).
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2381
JournalProfessions and Professionalism
Volume8
Issue number1
Number of pages15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Expertise
  • NPM
  • Organizational professionalism
  • Organizational scoring schemas
  • Professions
  • Social work

Cite this

@article{84073403f53742eb9645b82092d196ce,
title = "Organizational Professionalism: Social Workers Negotiating Tools of NPM",
abstract = "This article examines how social workers and managers perceive mean-ingful work and expertise in six care and treatment facilities in Denmark. Based on 29 interviews with social workers (n=22) and managers (n=7), the article shows how New Public Management-inspired tools such as scoring schemas align with social work values such as “client-centeredness” and working with the individual welfare recipient face-to-face. The article finds that fitting social work into organizational schemas changes the work practices of social workers and also the way members of this profession define meaningful work and expertise. In addition, the article also finds that scoring schemas cause conflicts among social workers regarding the char-acter of expertise when values of social work (to meet a welfare recipient’s need) must be aligned with NPM-inspired values of organizations (to meet managers’ de-mand for documentation).",
keywords = "Expertise, NPM, Organizational professionalism, Organizational scoring schemas, Professions, Social work, Expertise, NPM, Organizational professionalism, Organizational scoring schemas, Professions, Social work",
author = "Nanna Mik-Meyer",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.7577/pp.2381",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Professions and Professionalism",
issn = "1893-1049",
publisher = "Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences",
number = "1",

}

Organizational Professionalism : Social Workers Negotiating Tools of NPM. / Mik-Meyer, Nanna.

In: Professions and Professionalism, Vol. 8, No. 1, e2381, 2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational Professionalism

T2 - Social Workers Negotiating Tools of NPM

AU - Mik-Meyer, Nanna

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article examines how social workers and managers perceive mean-ingful work and expertise in six care and treatment facilities in Denmark. Based on 29 interviews with social workers (n=22) and managers (n=7), the article shows how New Public Management-inspired tools such as scoring schemas align with social work values such as “client-centeredness” and working with the individual welfare recipient face-to-face. The article finds that fitting social work into organizational schemas changes the work practices of social workers and also the way members of this profession define meaningful work and expertise. In addition, the article also finds that scoring schemas cause conflicts among social workers regarding the char-acter of expertise when values of social work (to meet a welfare recipient’s need) must be aligned with NPM-inspired values of organizations (to meet managers’ de-mand for documentation).

AB - This article examines how social workers and managers perceive mean-ingful work and expertise in six care and treatment facilities in Denmark. Based on 29 interviews with social workers (n=22) and managers (n=7), the article shows how New Public Management-inspired tools such as scoring schemas align with social work values such as “client-centeredness” and working with the individual welfare recipient face-to-face. The article finds that fitting social work into organizational schemas changes the work practices of social workers and also the way members of this profession define meaningful work and expertise. In addition, the article also finds that scoring schemas cause conflicts among social workers regarding the char-acter of expertise when values of social work (to meet a welfare recipient’s need) must be aligned with NPM-inspired values of organizations (to meet managers’ de-mand for documentation).

KW - Expertise

KW - NPM

KW - Organizational professionalism

KW - Organizational scoring schemas

KW - Professions

KW - Social work

KW - Expertise

KW - NPM

KW - Organizational professionalism

KW - Organizational scoring schemas

KW - Professions

KW - Social work

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=2670000000172860

U2 - 10.7577/pp.2381

DO - 10.7577/pp.2381

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

JO - Professions and Professionalism

JF - Professions and Professionalism

SN - 1893-1049

IS - 1

M1 - e2381

ER -