Organizational Identity Negotiations through Dominant and Counter Narratives

Didde Humle, Sanne Frandsen

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, we see the organization as a polyphonic, storytelling community and study the role of dominant and counter narratives in organizational identity formation processes as a web of stories performed and negotiated by organizational members and external stakeholders. Based on a case study of a highly contested organization, E-rail, we examine ticket inspectors’ story work to demonstrate how counter-narratives make room for multiple – and sometimes even opposing - understandings of organizational identity to co-exist. Our analysis shows that ticket inspectors in their story work draw explicitly on the media’s as well as management’s dominating narratives in constructing counter-narratives and creating shared understandings of who they are and what they do. These multiple understandings of organizational identity make it possible for organizational members to perform and pursue different storylines, while simultaneously establishing and maintaining a sense of continuity and stability around their organization and work despite identity threats, ambiguities and contradictions inherent in their role.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2014
Number of pages25
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventThe 13th International Studying Leadership Conference. ISLC 2014 - Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
Duration: 14 Dec 201416 Dec 2014
Conference number: 13
http://www.conferencemanager.dk/islc2014

Conference

ConferenceThe 13th International Studying Leadership Conference. ISLC 2014
Number13
LocationCopenhagen Business School
CountryDenmark
CityFrederiksberg
Period14/12/201416/12/2014
Internet address

Bibliographical note

CBS Library does not have access to the material

Cite this

Humle, D., & Frandsen, S. (2014). Organizational Identity Negotiations through Dominant and Counter Narratives. Paper presented at The 13th International Studying Leadership Conference. ISLC 2014, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Humle, Didde ; Frandsen, Sanne. / Organizational Identity Negotiations through Dominant and Counter Narratives. Paper presented at The 13th International Studying Leadership Conference. ISLC 2014, Frederiksberg, Denmark.25 p.
@conference{4c0451936e3b42b59e29f8a4f166fc41,
title = "Organizational Identity Negotiations through Dominant and Counter Narratives",
abstract = "In this paper, we see the organization as a polyphonic, storytelling community and study the role of dominant and counter narratives in organizational identity formation processes as a web of stories performed and negotiated by organizational members and external stakeholders. Based on a case study of a highly contested organization, E-rail, we examine ticket inspectors’ story work to demonstrate how counter-narratives make room for multiple – and sometimes even opposing - understandings of organizational identity to co-exist. Our analysis shows that ticket inspectors in their story work draw explicitly on the media’s as well as management’s dominating narratives in constructing counter-narratives and creating shared understandings of who they are and what they do. These multiple understandings of organizational identity make it possible for organizational members to perform and pursue different storylines, while simultaneously establishing and maintaining a sense of continuity and stability around their organization and work despite identity threats, ambiguities and contradictions inherent in their role.",
author = "Didde Humle and Sanne Frandsen",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 14-12-2014 Through 16-12-2014",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
url = "http://www.conferencemanager.dk/islc2014",

}

Humle, D & Frandsen, S 2014, 'Organizational Identity Negotiations through Dominant and Counter Narratives' Paper presented at, Frederiksberg, Denmark, 14/12/2014 - 16/12/2014, .

Organizational Identity Negotiations through Dominant and Counter Narratives. / Humle, Didde; Frandsen, Sanne.

2014. Paper presented at The 13th International Studying Leadership Conference. ISLC 2014, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Organizational Identity Negotiations through Dominant and Counter Narratives

AU - Humle, Didde

AU - Frandsen, Sanne

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In this paper, we see the organization as a polyphonic, storytelling community and study the role of dominant and counter narratives in organizational identity formation processes as a web of stories performed and negotiated by organizational members and external stakeholders. Based on a case study of a highly contested organization, E-rail, we examine ticket inspectors’ story work to demonstrate how counter-narratives make room for multiple – and sometimes even opposing - understandings of organizational identity to co-exist. Our analysis shows that ticket inspectors in their story work draw explicitly on the media’s as well as management’s dominating narratives in constructing counter-narratives and creating shared understandings of who they are and what they do. These multiple understandings of organizational identity make it possible for organizational members to perform and pursue different storylines, while simultaneously establishing and maintaining a sense of continuity and stability around their organization and work despite identity threats, ambiguities and contradictions inherent in their role.

AB - In this paper, we see the organization as a polyphonic, storytelling community and study the role of dominant and counter narratives in organizational identity formation processes as a web of stories performed and negotiated by organizational members and external stakeholders. Based on a case study of a highly contested organization, E-rail, we examine ticket inspectors’ story work to demonstrate how counter-narratives make room for multiple – and sometimes even opposing - understandings of organizational identity to co-exist. Our analysis shows that ticket inspectors in their story work draw explicitly on the media’s as well as management’s dominating narratives in constructing counter-narratives and creating shared understandings of who they are and what they do. These multiple understandings of organizational identity make it possible for organizational members to perform and pursue different storylines, while simultaneously establishing and maintaining a sense of continuity and stability around their organization and work despite identity threats, ambiguities and contradictions inherent in their role.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Humle D, Frandsen S. Organizational Identity Negotiations through Dominant and Counter Narratives. 2014. Paper presented at The 13th International Studying Leadership Conference. ISLC 2014, Frederiksberg, Denmark.