Oracle or Obstacle? Individual Level Knowledge, Heterogeinity and Innovation

Kristina Vaarst Andersen

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Boundary spanning is one way to accumulate diverse knowledge. This paper examines the conditions under which boundary spanning increases the value of project participants contributions to team production. Statistical findings from
    logit regressions show that the cost-benefit tradeoff of boundary spanning depends on whether the focal project is aimed at exploitation or exploration. If the focal project is mostly explorative, diverse knowledge is a valuable resource; in projects where the focus is on exploitation, diverse knowledge impedes project performance. The findings in this paper confirm and extend research on boundary spanning and organizational learning.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication date2012
    Number of pages28
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    EventThe DRUID Society Conference 2012 on Innovation and Competitiveness: Dynamics of Organizations, Industries, Systems and Regions - Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
    Duration: 19 Jun 201221 Jun 2012
    http://www.druid.dk/DRUID2012

    Conference

    ConferenceThe DRUID Society Conference 2012 on Innovation and Competitiveness
    LocationCopenhagen Business School
    CountryDenmark
    CityFrederiksberg
    Period19/06/201221/06/2012
    Internet address

    Cite this

    Vaarst Andersen, K. (2012). Oracle or Obstacle? Individual Level Knowledge, Heterogeinity and Innovation. Paper presented at The DRUID Society Conference 2012 on Innovation and Competitiveness, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
    Vaarst Andersen, Kristina. / Oracle or Obstacle? Individual Level Knowledge, Heterogeinity and Innovation. Paper presented at The DRUID Society Conference 2012 on Innovation and Competitiveness, Frederiksberg, Denmark.28 p.
    @conference{2a5a348cae154e9faa8e28e1d48c269d,
    title = "Oracle or Obstacle?: Individual Level Knowledge, Heterogeinity and Innovation",
    abstract = "Boundary spanning is one way to accumulate diverse knowledge. This paper examines the conditions under which boundary spanning increases the value of project participants contributions to team production. Statistical findings fromlogit regressions show that the cost-benefit tradeoff of boundary spanning depends on whether the focal project is aimed at exploitation or exploration. If the focal project is mostly explorative, diverse knowledge is a valuable resource; in projects where the focus is on exploitation, diverse knowledge impedes project performance. The findings in this paper confirm and extend research on boundary spanning and organizational learning.",
    author = "{Vaarst Andersen}, Kristina",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English",
    note = "null ; Conference date: 19-06-2012 Through 21-06-2012",
    url = "http://www.druid.dk/DRUID2012",

    }

    Vaarst Andersen, K 2012, 'Oracle or Obstacle? Individual Level Knowledge, Heterogeinity and Innovation' Paper presented at, Frederiksberg, Denmark, 19/06/2012 - 21/06/2012, .

    Oracle or Obstacle? Individual Level Knowledge, Heterogeinity and Innovation. / Vaarst Andersen, Kristina.

    2012. Paper presented at The DRUID Society Conference 2012 on Innovation and Competitiveness, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Oracle or Obstacle?

    T2 - Individual Level Knowledge, Heterogeinity and Innovation

    AU - Vaarst Andersen, Kristina

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Boundary spanning is one way to accumulate diverse knowledge. This paper examines the conditions under which boundary spanning increases the value of project participants contributions to team production. Statistical findings fromlogit regressions show that the cost-benefit tradeoff of boundary spanning depends on whether the focal project is aimed at exploitation or exploration. If the focal project is mostly explorative, diverse knowledge is a valuable resource; in projects where the focus is on exploitation, diverse knowledge impedes project performance. The findings in this paper confirm and extend research on boundary spanning and organizational learning.

    AB - Boundary spanning is one way to accumulate diverse knowledge. This paper examines the conditions under which boundary spanning increases the value of project participants contributions to team production. Statistical findings fromlogit regressions show that the cost-benefit tradeoff of boundary spanning depends on whether the focal project is aimed at exploitation or exploration. If the focal project is mostly explorative, diverse knowledge is a valuable resource; in projects where the focus is on exploitation, diverse knowledge impedes project performance. The findings in this paper confirm and extend research on boundary spanning and organizational learning.

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Vaarst Andersen K. Oracle or Obstacle? Individual Level Knowledge, Heterogeinity and Innovation. 2012. Paper presented at The DRUID Society Conference 2012 on Innovation and Competitiveness, Frederiksberg, Denmark.