Abstract
Prior studies have documented that pension plan sponsors often monitor a fund’s performance relative to a benchmark. We use a first-difference approach to show that in an effort to beat benchmarks, fund managers controlling large pension assets tend to increase their exposure to high-beta stocks, while aiming to maintain tracking errors around the benchmark. The findings support theoretical conjectures that benchmarking can lead managers to tilt their portfolio toward high-beta stocks and away from low-beta stocks, which can reinforce observed pricing anomalies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | The Review of Financial Studies |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 8 |
Pages (from-to) | 2596-2620 |
Number of pages | 25 |
ISSN | 0893-9454 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2017 |