On Public–private Partnership Performance: A Contemporary Review

Graeme A. Hodge, Carsten Greve

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Private finance-based infrastructure public–private partnerships (P3s) are globally popular, including renewed interest in the United States, but their performance remains contested. This article explores the meaning of P3 and the notion of P3 success, and points to multiple interpretations of both. It proposes a new conceptual model of the P3 phenomenon, including five levels of meaning: project, delivery method, policy, governance tool, and cultural context. Numerous criteria exist on which the success of P3 might be judged. These are as oriented toward politics and governance as they are toward more traditional utilitarian policy goals concerned with project delivery, or value for money (VfM). Indeed, governments have dozens of different goals in mind. Given mixed international results to date for VfM, it is posited that to the extent that infrastructure P3s continue to show popularity, governments may stress P3 success more on the basis of political and governance strengths, than utilitarian characteristics.
    Private finance-based infrastructure public–private partnerships (P3s) are globally popular, including renewed interest in the United States, but their performance remains contested. This article explores the meaning of P3 and the notion of P3 success, and points to multiple interpretations of both. It proposes a new conceptual model of the P3 phenomenon, including five levels of meaning: project, delivery method, policy, governance tool, and cultural context. Numerous criteria exist on which the success of P3 might be judged. These are as oriented toward politics and governance as they are toward more traditional utilitarian policy goals concerned with project delivery, or value for money (VfM). Indeed, governments have dozens of different goals in mind. Given mixed international results to date for VfM, it is posited that to the extent that infrastructure P3s continue to show popularity, governments may stress P3 success more on the basis of political and governance strengths, than utilitarian characteristics.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalPublic Works Management & Policy
    Volume22
    Issue number1
    Pages55-78
    ISSN1087-724X
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2017

    Keywords

    • Contracting
    • Infrastructure development
    • Public–private partnerships
    • Performance
    • Policy

    Cite this

    @article{a3bb4cbf63e24505ab5badf22dcdeca4,
    title = "On Public–private Partnership Performance: A Contemporary Review",
    abstract = "Private finance-based infrastructure public–private partnerships (P3s) are globally popular, including renewed interest in the United States, but their performance remains contested. This article explores the meaning of P3 and the notion of P3 success, and points to multiple interpretations of both. It proposes a new conceptual model of the P3 phenomenon, including five levels of meaning: project, delivery method, policy, governance tool, and cultural context. Numerous criteria exist on which the success of P3 might be judged. These are as oriented toward politics and governance as they are toward more traditional utilitarian policy goals concerned with project delivery, or value for money (VfM). Indeed, governments have dozens of different goals in mind. Given mixed international results to date for VfM, it is posited that to the extent that infrastructure P3s continue to show popularity, governments may stress P3 success more on the basis of political and governance strengths, than utilitarian characteristics.",
    keywords = "Contracting, Infrastructure development, Public–private partnerships, Performance, Policy, Contracting, Infrastructure development, Public–private partnerships, Performance, Policy",
    author = "Hodge, {Graeme A.} and Carsten Greve",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/1087724X16657830",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "55--78",
    journal = "Public Works Management & Policy",
    issn = "1087-724X",
    publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
    number = "1",

    }

    On Public–private Partnership Performance : A Contemporary Review. / Hodge, Graeme A.; Greve, Carsten.

    In: Public Works Management & Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 55-78.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - On Public–private Partnership Performance

    T2 - Public Works Management & Policy

    AU - Hodge,Graeme A.

    AU - Greve,Carsten

    PY - 2017/1

    Y1 - 2017/1

    N2 - Private finance-based infrastructure public–private partnerships (P3s) are globally popular, including renewed interest in the United States, but their performance remains contested. This article explores the meaning of P3 and the notion of P3 success, and points to multiple interpretations of both. It proposes a new conceptual model of the P3 phenomenon, including five levels of meaning: project, delivery method, policy, governance tool, and cultural context. Numerous criteria exist on which the success of P3 might be judged. These are as oriented toward politics and governance as they are toward more traditional utilitarian policy goals concerned with project delivery, or value for money (VfM). Indeed, governments have dozens of different goals in mind. Given mixed international results to date for VfM, it is posited that to the extent that infrastructure P3s continue to show popularity, governments may stress P3 success more on the basis of political and governance strengths, than utilitarian characteristics.

    AB - Private finance-based infrastructure public–private partnerships (P3s) are globally popular, including renewed interest in the United States, but their performance remains contested. This article explores the meaning of P3 and the notion of P3 success, and points to multiple interpretations of both. It proposes a new conceptual model of the P3 phenomenon, including five levels of meaning: project, delivery method, policy, governance tool, and cultural context. Numerous criteria exist on which the success of P3 might be judged. These are as oriented toward politics and governance as they are toward more traditional utilitarian policy goals concerned with project delivery, or value for money (VfM). Indeed, governments have dozens of different goals in mind. Given mixed international results to date for VfM, it is posited that to the extent that infrastructure P3s continue to show popularity, governments may stress P3 success more on the basis of political and governance strengths, than utilitarian characteristics.

    KW - Contracting

    KW - Infrastructure development

    KW - Public–private partnerships

    KW - Performance

    KW - Policy

    KW - Contracting

    KW - Infrastructure development

    KW - Public–private partnerships

    KW - Performance

    KW - Policy

    UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963018304234&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1177/1087724X16657830

    DO - 10.1177/1087724X16657830

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 22

    SP - 55

    EP - 78

    JO - Public Works Management & Policy

    JF - Public Works Management & Policy

    SN - 1087-724X

    IS - 1

    ER -