Office and Agamben's Genealogy of Economy and Government

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper locates Giorgio Agamben’s book Opus Dei in his larger Homo Sacer project and particularly a series of genealogical and archaeological studies within it. It argues for a disenchanted and dispersed reading of Agamben’s approach to office as a resource for concerns that are germane to cultural and political sociology and that are irreducible to Heideggerian metaphysics. This reading foregrounds methodological questions of genealogy and archaeology (and hence Agamben’s relation to Foucault), religious liturgy and political practice, and the theory of the priesthood as a paradigm for office. More broadly, Agamben’s work on office is shown to bear upon questions of the constitution of sovereignty and government as forms of power, on different forms of rationalisation, and themes of secularisation and modernity found in classical sociology and intellectual history.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology
Volume4
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)200-222
Number of pages23
ISSN2325-4823
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Agamben
  • Office
  • Genealogy
  • Archaeology
  • Weber
  • Foucault

Cite this

@article{e3b48def49524fe895f786f4287e8cd4,
title = "Office and Agamben's Genealogy of Economy and Government",
abstract = "This paper locates Giorgio Agamben’s book Opus Dei in his larger Homo Sacer project and particularly a series of genealogical and archaeological studies within it. It argues for a disenchanted and dispersed reading of Agamben’s approach to office as a resource for concerns that are germane to cultural and political sociology and that are irreducible to Heideggerian metaphysics. This reading foregrounds methodological questions of genealogy and archaeology (and hence Agamben’s relation to Foucault), religious liturgy and political practice, and the theory of the priesthood as a paradigm for office. More broadly, Agamben’s work on office is shown to bear upon questions of the constitution of sovereignty and government as forms of power, on different forms of rationalisation, and themes of secularisation and modernity found in classical sociology and intellectual history.",
keywords = "Agamben, Office, Genealogy, Archaeology, Weber, Foucault, Agamben, Office, Genealogy, Archaeology, Weber, Foucault",
author = "Mitchell Dean",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/23254823.2017.1300542",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "200--222",
journal = "European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology",
issn = "2325-4823",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Office and Agamben's Genealogy of Economy and Government. / Dean, Mitchell.

In: European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2017, p. 200-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Office and Agamben's Genealogy of Economy and Government

AU - Dean, Mitchell

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This paper locates Giorgio Agamben’s book Opus Dei in his larger Homo Sacer project and particularly a series of genealogical and archaeological studies within it. It argues for a disenchanted and dispersed reading of Agamben’s approach to office as a resource for concerns that are germane to cultural and political sociology and that are irreducible to Heideggerian metaphysics. This reading foregrounds methodological questions of genealogy and archaeology (and hence Agamben’s relation to Foucault), religious liturgy and political practice, and the theory of the priesthood as a paradigm for office. More broadly, Agamben’s work on office is shown to bear upon questions of the constitution of sovereignty and government as forms of power, on different forms of rationalisation, and themes of secularisation and modernity found in classical sociology and intellectual history.

AB - This paper locates Giorgio Agamben’s book Opus Dei in his larger Homo Sacer project and particularly a series of genealogical and archaeological studies within it. It argues for a disenchanted and dispersed reading of Agamben’s approach to office as a resource for concerns that are germane to cultural and political sociology and that are irreducible to Heideggerian metaphysics. This reading foregrounds methodological questions of genealogy and archaeology (and hence Agamben’s relation to Foucault), religious liturgy and political practice, and the theory of the priesthood as a paradigm for office. More broadly, Agamben’s work on office is shown to bear upon questions of the constitution of sovereignty and government as forms of power, on different forms of rationalisation, and themes of secularisation and modernity found in classical sociology and intellectual history.

KW - Agamben

KW - Office

KW - Genealogy

KW - Archaeology

KW - Weber

KW - Foucault

KW - Agamben

KW - Office

KW - Genealogy

KW - Archaeology

KW - Weber

KW - Foucault

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=2560000000096212

U2 - 10.1080/23254823.2017.1300542

DO - 10.1080/23254823.2017.1300542

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 200

EP - 222

JO - European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology

JF - European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology

SN - 2325-4823

IS - 2

ER -